-
Analysis of Cortical Morphometric Variability Using Labeled Cortical Distance Maps
Authors:
E. Ceyhan,
T. Nishino,
K. N. Botteron,
M. I. Miller,
J. T. Ratnanather
Abstract:
Morphometric differences in the anatomy of cortical structures are associated with neuro-developmental and neuropsychiatric disorders. Such differences can be quantized and detected by a powerful tool called Labeled Cortical Distance Map (LCDM). The LCDM method pro-vides distances of labeled gray matter (GM) voxels from the GM/white matter (WM) surface for specific cortical structures (or tissues)…
▽ More
Morphometric differences in the anatomy of cortical structures are associated with neuro-developmental and neuropsychiatric disorders. Such differences can be quantized and detected by a powerful tool called Labeled Cortical Distance Map (LCDM). The LCDM method pro-vides distances of labeled gray matter (GM) voxels from the GM/white matter (WM) surface for specific cortical structures (or tissues). Here we describe a method to analyze morphometric variability in the particular tissue using LCDM distances. To extract more of the information provided by LCDM distances, we perform pooling and censoring of LCDM distances. In particular, we employ Brown-Forsythe (BF) test of homogeneity of variance (HOV) on the LCDM distances. HOV analysis of pooled distances provides an overall analysis of morphometric variability of the LCDMs due to the disease in question, while the HOV analysis of censored distances suggests the location(s) of significant variation in these differences (i.e., at which distance from the GM/WM surface the morphometric variability starts to be significant). We also check for the influence of assumption violations on the HOV analysis of LCDM distances. In particular, we demonstrate that BF HOV test is robust to assumption violations such as the non-normality and within sample dependence of the residuals from the median for pooled and censored distances and are robust to data aggregation which occurs in analysis of censored distances. We illustrate the methodology on a real data example, namely, LCDM distances of GM voxels in ventral medial prefrontal cortices (VMPFCs) to see the effects of depression or being of high risk to depression on the morphometry of VMPFCs. The methodology used here is also valid for morphometric analysis of other cortical structures.
△ Less
Submitted 25 October, 2015;
originally announced October 2015.
-
Censoring Distances Based on Labeled Cortical Distance Maps in Cortical Morphometry
Authors:
E. Ceyhan,
T. Nishino,
J. Alexopolous,
R. D. Todd,
K. N. Botteron,
M. I. Miller,
J. T. Ratnanather
Abstract:
Shape differences are manifested in cortical structures due to neuropsychiatric disorders. Such differences can be measured by labeled cortical distance mapping (LCDM) which characterizes the morphometry of the laminar cortical mantle of cortical structures. LCDM data consist of signed distances of gray matter (GM) voxels with respect to GM/white matter (WM) surface. Volumes and descriptive measur…
▽ More
Shape differences are manifested in cortical structures due to neuropsychiatric disorders. Such differences can be measured by labeled cortical distance mapping (LCDM) which characterizes the morphometry of the laminar cortical mantle of cortical structures. LCDM data consist of signed distances of gray matter (GM) voxels with respect to GM/white matter (WM) surface. Volumes and descriptive measures (such as means and variances) for each subject and the pooled distances provide the morphometric differences between diagnostic groups, but they do not reveal all the morphometric information contained in LCDM distances. To extract more information from LCDM data, censoring of the distances is introduced. For censoring of LCDM distances, the range of LCDM distances is partitioned at a fixed increment size; and at each censoring step, and distances not exceeding the censoring distance are kept. Censored LCDM distances inherit the advantages of the pooled distances. Furthermore, the analysis of censored distances provides information about the location of morphometric differences which cannot be obtained from the pooled distances. However, at each step, the censored distances aggregate, which might confound the results. The influence of data aggregation is investigated with an extensive Monte Carlo simulation analysis and it is demonstrated that this influence is negligible. As an illustrative example, GM of ventral medial prefrontal cortices (VMPFCs) of subjects with major depressive disorder (MDD), subjects at high risk (HR) of MDD, and healthy control (Ctrl) subjects are used. A significant reduction in laminar thickness of the VMPFC and perhaps shrinkage in MDD and HR subjects is observed when compared to Ctrl subjects. The methodology is also applicable to LCDM-based morphometric measures of other cortical structures affected by disease.
△ Less
Submitted 20 January, 2013;
originally announced January 2013.
-
Analysis of Metric Distances and Volumes of Hippocampi Indicates Different Morphometric Changes over Time in Dementia of Alzheimer Type and Nondemented Subjects
Authors:
Elvan Ceyhan,
Can Ceritoglu,
M. Faisal Beg,
Lei Wang,
John C. Morris,
John G. Csernansky,
Michael I. Miller,
John Tilak Ratnanather
Abstract:
In this article, we analyze the morphometry of hippocampus in subjects with very mild dementia of Alzheimer's type (DAT) and nondemented controls and how it changes over a two-year period. Morphometric differences with respect to a template hippocampus were measured by the metric distance obtained from the Large Deformation Diffeomorphic Metric Mapping (LDDMM) algorithm which was previously used…
▽ More
In this article, we analyze the morphometry of hippocampus in subjects with very mild dementia of Alzheimer's type (DAT) and nondemented controls and how it changes over a two-year period. Morphometric differences with respect to a template hippocampus were measured by the metric distance obtained from the Large Deformation Diffeomorphic Metric Mapping (LDDMM) algorithm which was previously used to calculate dense one-to-one correspondence vector fields between the shapes. LDDMM assigns metric distances on the space of anatomical images thereby allowing for the direct comparison and quantization of morphometric changes. We use various statistical methods to compare the metric distances in a cross-sectional and longitudinal manner. At baseline, the metric distances for demented subjects are found not to be significantly different from those for nondemented subjects. At follow-up, the metric distances for demented subjects were significantly larger compared to nondemented subjects. The metric distances for demented subjects increased significantly from baseline to follow-up but not for nondemented subjects. We also use the metric distances in logistic regression for diagnostic discrimination of subjects. We compare metric distances with the volumes and obtain similar results. In classification, the model that uses volume, metric distance, and volume loss over time together performs better in detecting DAT. Thus, metric distances with respect to a template computed via LDDMM can be a powerful tool in detecting differences in shape in cross-sectional as well as longitudinal studies.
△ Less
Submitted 14 August, 2008; v1 submitted 9 June, 2008;
originally announced June 2008.
-
The Use of Labeled Cortical Distance Maps for Quantization and Analysis of Anatomical Morphometry of Brain Tissues
Authors:
E. Ceyhan,
M. Hosakere,
T. Nishino,
J. Alexopoulos,
R. D. Todd,
K. N. Botteron,
M. I. Miller,
J. T. Ratnanather
Abstract:
Anatomical shape differences in cortical structures in the brain can be associated with various neuropsychiatric and neuro-developmental diseases or disorders. Labeled Cortical Distance Map (LCDM), can be a powerful tool to quantize such morphometric differences. In this article, we investigate various issues regarding the analysis of LCDM distances in relation to morphometry. The length of the…
▽ More
Anatomical shape differences in cortical structures in the brain can be associated with various neuropsychiatric and neuro-developmental diseases or disorders. Labeled Cortical Distance Map (LCDM), can be a powerful tool to quantize such morphometric differences. In this article, we investigate various issues regarding the analysis of LCDM distances in relation to morphometry. The length of the LCDM distance vector provides the number of voxels (approximately a multiple of volume (in mm^3)); median, mode, range, and variance of LCDM distances are all suggestive of size, thickness, and shape differences. However these measures provide a crude summary based on LCDM distances which may convey much more information about the tissue in question. To utilize more of this information, we pool (merge) the LCDM distances from subjects in the same group or condition. The statistical methodology we employ require normality and within and between sample independence. We demonstrate that the violation of these assumptions have mild influence on the tests. We specify the types of alternatives the parametric and nonparametric tests are more sensitive for. We also show that the pooled LCDM distances provide powerful results for group differences in distribution, left-right morphometric asymmetry of the tissues, and variation of LCDM distances. As an illustrative example, we use gray matter (GM) tissue of ventral medial prefrontal cortices (VMPFCs) from subjects with major depressive disorder, subjects at high risk, and control subjects. We find significant evidence that VMPFCs of subjects with depressive disorders are different in shape compared to those of normal subjects.
△ Less
Submitted 25 May, 2008;
originally announced May 2008.
