-
Uniform Critical Values for Likelihood Ratio Tests in Boundary Problems
Authors:
Giuseppe Cavaliere,
Adam McCloskey,
Rasmus S. Pedersen,
Anders Rahbek
Abstract:
Limit distributions of likelihood ratio statistics are well-known to be discontinuous in the presence of nuisance parameters at the boundary of the parameter space, which lead to size distortions when standard critical values are used for testing. In this paper, we propose a new and simple way of constructing critical values that yields uniformly correct asymptotic size, regardless of whether nuis…
▽ More
Limit distributions of likelihood ratio statistics are well-known to be discontinuous in the presence of nuisance parameters at the boundary of the parameter space, which lead to size distortions when standard critical values are used for testing. In this paper, we propose a new and simple way of constructing critical values that yields uniformly correct asymptotic size, regardless of whether nuisance parameters are at, near or far from the boundary of the parameter space. Importantly, the proposed critical values are trivial to compute and at the same time provide powerful tests in most settings. In comparison to existing size-correction methods, the new approach exploits the monotonicity of the two components of the limiting distribution of the likelihood ratio statistic, in conjunction with rectangular confidence sets for the nuisance parameters, to gain computational tractability. Uniform validity is established for likelihood ratio tests based on the new critical values, and we provide illustrations of their construction in two key examples: (i) testing a coefficient of interest in the classical linear regression model with non-negativity constraints on control coefficients, and, (ii) testing for the presence of exogenous variables in autoregressive conditional heteroskedastic models (ARCH) with exogenous regressors. Simulations confirm that the tests have desirable size and power properties. A brief empirical illustration demonstrates the usefulness of our proposed test in relation to testing for spill-overs and ARCH effects.
△ Less
Submitted 25 July, 2025;
originally announced July 2025.
-
High-dimensional cointegration and Kuramoto systems
Authors:
Jacob Stærk-Østergaard,
Anders Rahbek,
Susanne Ditlevsen
Abstract:
This paper presents a novel estimator for a non-standard restriction to both symmetry and low rank in the context of high dimensional cointegrated processes. Furthermore, we discuss rank estimation for high dimensional cointegrated processes by restricted bootstrapping of the Gaussian innovations. We demonstrate that the classical rank test for cointegrated systems is prone to underestimate the tr…
▽ More
This paper presents a novel estimator for a non-standard restriction to both symmetry and low rank in the context of high dimensional cointegrated processes. Furthermore, we discuss rank estimation for high dimensional cointegrated processes by restricted bootstrapping of the Gaussian innovations. We demonstrate that the classical rank test for cointegrated systems is prone to underestimate the true rank and demonstrate this effect in a 100 dimensional system. We also discuss the implications of this underestimation for such high dimensional systems in general. Also, we define a linearized Kuramoto system and present a simulation study, where we infer the cointegration rank of the unrestricted $p\times p$ system and successively the underlying clustered network structure based on a graphical approach and a symmetrized low rank estimator of the couplings derived from a reparametrization of the likelihood under this unusual restriction.
△ Less
Submitted 14 August, 2022;
originally announced August 2022.
-
The validity of bootstrap testing in the threshold framework
Authors:
Simone Giannerini,
Greta Goracci,
Anders Rahbek
Abstract:
We consider bootstrap-based testing for threshold effects in non-linear threshold autoregressive (TAR) models. It is well-known that classic tests based on asymptotic theory tend to be oversized in the case of small, or even moderate sample sizes, or when the estimated parameters indicate non-stationarity, as often witnessed in the analysis of financial or climate data. To address the issue we pro…
▽ More
We consider bootstrap-based testing for threshold effects in non-linear threshold autoregressive (TAR) models. It is well-known that classic tests based on asymptotic theory tend to be oversized in the case of small, or even moderate sample sizes, or when the estimated parameters indicate non-stationarity, as often witnessed in the analysis of financial or climate data. To address the issue we propose a supremum Lagrange Multiplier test statistic (sLMb), where the null hypothesis specifies a linear autoregressive (AR) model against the alternative of a TAR model. We consider a recursive bootstrap applied to the sLMb statistic and establish its validity. This result is new, and requires the proof of non-standard results for bootstrap analysis in time series models; this includes a uniform bootstrap law of large numbers and a bootstrap functional central limit theorem. These new results can also be used as a general theoretical framework that can be adapted to other situations, such as regime-switching processes with exogenous threshold variables, or testing for structural breaks. The Monte Carlo evidence shows that the bootstrap test has correct empirical size even for small samples, and also no loss of empirical power when compared to the asymptotic test. Moreover, its performance is not affected if the order of the autoregression is estimated based on information criteria. Finally, we analyse a panel of short time series to assess the effect of warming on population dynamics.
△ Less
Submitted 31 December, 2021;
originally announced January 2022.
-
MinP Score Tests with an Inequality Constrained Parameter Space
Authors:
Giuseppe Cavaliere,
Zeng-Hua Lu,
Anders Rahbek,
Yuhong Yang
Abstract:
Score tests have the advantage of requiring estimation alone of the model restricted by the null hypothesis, which often is much simpler than models defined under the alternative hypothesis. This is typically so when the alternative hypothesis involves inequality constraints. However, existing score tests address only jointly testing all parameters of interest; a leading example is testing all ARC…
▽ More
Score tests have the advantage of requiring estimation alone of the model restricted by the null hypothesis, which often is much simpler than models defined under the alternative hypothesis. This is typically so when the alternative hypothesis involves inequality constraints. However, existing score tests address only jointly testing all parameters of interest; a leading example is testing all ARCH parameters or variances of random coefficients being zero or not. In such testing problems rejection of the null hypothesis does not provide evidence on rejection of specific elements of parameter of interest. This paper proposes a class of one-sided score tests for testing a model parameter that is subject to inequality constraints. Proposed tests are constructed based on the minimum of a set of $p$-values. The minimand includes the $p$-values for testing individual elements of parameter of interest using individual scores. It may be extended to include a $p$-value of existing score tests. We show that our tests perform better than/or perform as good as existing score tests in terms of joint testing, and has furthermore the added benefit of allowing for simultaneously testing individual elements of parameter of interest. The added benefit is appealing in the sense that it can identify a model without estimating it. We illustrate our tests in linear regression models, ARCH and random coefficient models. A detailed simulation study is provided to examine the finite sample performance of the proposed tests and we find that our tests perform well as expected.
△ Less
Submitted 13 July, 2021;
originally announced July 2021.
-
Specification tests for GARCH processes
Authors:
Giuseppe Cavaliere,
Indeewara Perera,
Anders Rahbek
Abstract:
This paper develops tests for the correct specification of the conditional variance function in GARCH models when the true parameter may lie on the boundary of the parameter space. The test statistics considered are of Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Cramér-von Mises type, and are based on a certain empirical process marked by centered squared residuals. The limiting distributions of the test statistics ar…
▽ More
This paper develops tests for the correct specification of the conditional variance function in GARCH models when the true parameter may lie on the boundary of the parameter space. The test statistics considered are of Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Cramér-von Mises type, and are based on a certain empirical process marked by centered squared residuals. The limiting distributions of the test statistics are not free from (unknown) nuisance parameters, and hence critical values cannot be tabulated. A novel bootstrap procedure is proposed to implement the tests; it is shown to be asymptotically valid under general conditions, irrespective of the presence of nuisance parameters on the boundary. The proposed bootstrap approach is based on shrinking of the parameter estimates used to generate the bootstrap sample toward the boundary of the parameter space at a proper rate. It is simple to implement and fast in applications, as the associated test statistics have simple closed form expressions. A simulation study demonstrates that the new tests: (i) have excellent finite sample behavior in terms of empirical rejection probabilities under the null as well as under the alternative; (ii) provide a useful complement to existing procedures based on Ljung-Box type approaches. Two data examples are considered to illustrate the tests.
△ Less
Submitted 28 May, 2021;
originally announced May 2021.
