Are Made and Missed Different? An analysis of Field Goal Attempts of Professional Basketball Players via Depth Based Testing Procedure
Authors:
Kai Qi,
Guanyu Hu,
Wei Wu
Abstract:
In this paper, we develop a novel depth-based testing procedure on spatial point processes to examine the difference in made and missed field goal attempts for NBA players. Specifically, our testing procedure can statistically detect the differences between made and missed field goal attempts for NBA players. We first obtain the depths of two processes under the polar coordinate system. A two-dime…
▽ More
In this paper, we develop a novel depth-based testing procedure on spatial point processes to examine the difference in made and missed field goal attempts for NBA players. Specifically, our testing procedure can statistically detect the differences between made and missed field goal attempts for NBA players. We first obtain the depths of two processes under the polar coordinate system. A two-dimensional Kolmogorov-Smirnov test is then performed to test the difference between the depths of the two processes. Throughout extensive simulation studies, we show our testing procedure with good frequentist properties under both null hypothesis and alternative hypothesis. A comparison against the competing methods shows that our proposed procedure has better testing reliability and testing power. Application to the shot chart data of 191 NBA players in the 2017-2018 regular season offers interesting insights about these players' made and missed shot patterns.
△ Less
Submitted 25 March, 2024;
originally announced March 2024.
The Alzheimer's Disease Prediction Of Longitudinal Evolution (TADPOLE) Challenge: Results after 1 Year Follow-up
Authors:
Razvan V. Marinescu,
Neil P. Oxtoby,
Alexandra L. Young,
Esther E. Bron,
Arthur W. Toga,
Michael W. Weiner,
Frederik Barkhof,
Nick C. Fox,
Arman Eshaghi,
Tina Toni,
Marcin Salaterski,
Veronika Lunina,
Manon Ansart,
Stanley Durrleman,
Pascal Lu,
Samuel Iddi,
Dan Li,
Wesley K. Thompson,
Michael C. Donohue,
Aviv Nahon,
Yarden Levy,
Dan Halbersberg,
Mariya Cohen,
Huiling Liao,
Tengfei Li
, et al. (71 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We present the findings of "The Alzheimer's Disease Prediction Of Longitudinal Evolution" (TADPOLE) Challenge, which compared the performance of 92 algorithms from 33 international teams at predicting the future trajectory of 219 individuals at risk of Alzheimer's disease. Challenge participants were required to make a prediction, for each month of a 5-year future time period, of three key outcome…
▽ More
We present the findings of "The Alzheimer's Disease Prediction Of Longitudinal Evolution" (TADPOLE) Challenge, which compared the performance of 92 algorithms from 33 international teams at predicting the future trajectory of 219 individuals at risk of Alzheimer's disease. Challenge participants were required to make a prediction, for each month of a 5-year future time period, of three key outcomes: clinical diagnosis, Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale Cognitive Subdomain (ADAS-Cog13), and total volume of the ventricles. The methods used by challenge participants included multivariate linear regression, machine learning methods such as support vector machines and deep neural networks, as well as disease progression models. No single submission was best at predicting all three outcomes. For clinical diagnosis and ventricle volume prediction, the best algorithms strongly outperform simple baselines in predictive ability. However, for ADAS-Cog13 no single submitted prediction method was significantly better than random guesswork. Two ensemble methods based on taking the mean and median over all predictions, obtained top scores on almost all tasks. Better than average performance at diagnosis prediction was generally associated with the additional inclusion of features from cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI). On the other hand, better performance at ventricle volume prediction was associated with inclusion of summary statistics, such as the slope or maxima/minima of biomarkers. TADPOLE's unique results suggest that current prediction algorithms provide sufficient accuracy to exploit biomarkers related to clinical diagnosis and ventricle volume, for cohort refinement in clinical trials for Alzheimer's disease. However, results call into question the usage of cognitive test scores for patient selection and as a primary endpoint in clinical trials.
△ Less
Submitted 27 December, 2021; v1 submitted 9 February, 2020;
originally announced February 2020.
Dirichlet Depths for Point Process
Authors:
Kai Qi,
Yang Chen,
Wei Wu
Abstract:
Statistical depths have been well studied for multivariate and functional data over the past few decades, but remain under-explored for point processes. A first attempt on the notion of point process depth was conducted recently where the depth was defined as a weighted product of two terms: (1) the probability of the number of events in each process and (2) the depth of the event times conditione…
▽ More
Statistical depths have been well studied for multivariate and functional data over the past few decades, but remain under-explored for point processes. A first attempt on the notion of point process depth was conducted recently where the depth was defined as a weighted product of two terms: (1) the probability of the number of events in each process and (2) the depth of the event times conditioned on the number of events by using a Mahalanobis depth. We point out that multivariate depths such as the Mahalanobis depth cannot be directly used because they often neglect the important ordered property in the point process events. To deal with this problem, we propose a model-based approach for point processes systematically. In particular, we develop a Dirichlet-distribution-based framework on the conditional depth term, where the new methods are referred to as Dirichlet depths. We examine the mathematical properties of the new depths and conduct the asymptotic analysis. In addition, we illustrate the new methods using various simulated and real experiment data. It is found that the proposed framework provides a proper center-outward rank and the new methods have superior decoding performance to previous methods in two neural spike train datasets.
△ Less
Submitted 16 September, 2019;
originally announced September 2019.
