Showing 1–3 of 3 results for author: Pshenichnikov, M S

Putin's peaks: Russian election data revisited

Authors: Dmitry Kobak, Sergey Shpilkin, Maxim S. Pshenichnikov

Abstract: We study the anomalous prevalence of integer percentages in the last parliamentary (2016) and presidential (2018) Russian elections. We show how this anomaly in Russian federal elections has evolved since 2000. We study the anomalous prevalence of integer percentages in the last parliamentary (2016) and presidential (2018) Russian elections. We show how this anomaly in Russian federal elections has evolved since 2000. △ Less

Submitted 25 April, 2018; originally announced April 2018.

Comments: To appear in Significance magazine

Journal ref: Significance 15 (3), 2018, 8-9

Integer percentages as electoral falsification fingerprints

Authors: Dmitry Kobak, Sergey Shpilkin, Maxim S. Pshenichnikov

Abstract: We hypothesize that if election results are manipulated or forged, then, due to the well-known human attraction to round numbers, the frequency of reported round percentages can be increased. To test this hypothesis, we analyzed raw data from seven federal elections held in the Russian Federation during the period from 2000 to 2012 and found that in all elections since 2004 the number of polling s… ▽ More We hypothesize that if election results are manipulated or forged, then, due to the well-known human attraction to round numbers, the frequency of reported round percentages can be increased. To test this hypothesis, we analyzed raw data from seven federal elections held in the Russian Federation during the period from 2000 to 2012 and found that in all elections since 2004 the number of polling stations reporting turnout and/or leader's result expressed by an integer percentage (as opposed to a fractional value) was much higher than expected by pure chance. Monte Carlo simulations confirmed high statistical significance of the observed phenomenon, thereby suggesting its man-made nature. Geographical analysis showed that these anomalies were concentrated in a specific subset of Russian regions which strongly suggests its orchestrated origin. Unlike previously proposed statistical indicators of alleged electoral falsifications, our observations can hardly be explained differently but by a widespread election fraud. △ Less

Submitted 29 June, 2016; v1 submitted 22 October, 2014; originally announced October 2014.

Comments: Published at http://dx.doi.org/10.1214/16-AOAS904 in the Annals of Applied Statistics (http://www.imstat.org/aoas/) by the Institute of Mathematical Statistics (http://www.imstat.org)

Report number: IMS-AOAS-AOAS904

Journal ref: Annals of Applied Statistics 2016, Vol. 10, No. 1, 54-73

Statistical anomalies in 2011-2012 Russian elections revealed by 2D correlation analysis

Authors: Dmitry Kobak, Sergey Shpilkin, Maxim S. Pshenichnikov

Abstract: Here we perform a statistical analysis of the official data from recent Russian parliamentary and presidential elections (held on December 4th, 2011 and March 4th, 2012, respectively). A number of anomalies are identified that persistently skew the results in favour of the pro-government party, United Russia (UR), and its leader Vladimir Putin. The main irregularities are: (i) remarkably high corr… ▽ More Here we perform a statistical analysis of the official data from recent Russian parliamentary and presidential elections (held on December 4th, 2011 and March 4th, 2012, respectively). A number of anomalies are identified that persistently skew the results in favour of the pro-government party, United Russia (UR), and its leader Vladimir Putin. The main irregularities are: (i) remarkably high correlation between turnout and voting results; (ii) a large number of polling stations where the UR/Putin results are given by a round number of percent; (iii) constituencies showing improbably low or (iv) anomalously high dispersion of results across polling stations; (v) substantial difference between results at paper-based and electronic polling stations. These anomalies, albeit less prominent in the presidential elections, hardly conform to the assumptions of fair and free voting. The approaches proposed here can be readily extended to quantify fingerprints of electoral fraud in any other problematic elections. △ Less

Submitted 17 May, 2012; v1 submitted 3 May, 2012; originally announced May 2012.

Comments: 12 pages, 5 figures; Methods slightly expanded