Meta-Learning for One-Class Classification with Few Examples using Order-Equivariant Network
Authors:
Ademola Oladosu,
Tony Xu,
Philip Ekfeldt,
Brian A. Kelly,
Miles Cranmer,
Shirley Ho,
Adrian M. Price-Whelan,
Gabriella Contardo
Abstract:
This paper presents a meta-learning framework for few-shots One-Class Classification (OCC) at test-time, a setting where labeled examples are only available for the positive class, and no supervision is given for the negative example. We consider that we have a set of `one-class classification' objective-tasks with only a small set of positive examples available for each task, and a set of trainin…
▽ More
This paper presents a meta-learning framework for few-shots One-Class Classification (OCC) at test-time, a setting where labeled examples are only available for the positive class, and no supervision is given for the negative example. We consider that we have a set of `one-class classification' objective-tasks with only a small set of positive examples available for each task, and a set of training tasks with full supervision (i.e. highly imbalanced classification). We propose an approach using order-equivariant networks to learn a 'meta' binary-classifier. The model will take as input an example to classify from a given task, as well as the corresponding supervised set of positive examples for this OCC task. Thus, the output of the model will be 'conditioned' on the available positive example of a given task, allowing to predict on new tasks and new examples without labeled negative examples. In this paper, we are motivated by an astronomy application. Our goal is to identify if stars belong to a specific stellar group (the 'one-class' for a given task), called \textit{stellar streams}, where each stellar stream is a different OCC-task. We show that our method transfers well on unseen (test) synthetic streams, and outperforms the baselines even though it is not retrained and accesses a much smaller part of the data per task to predict (only positive supervision). We see however that it doesn't transfer as well on the real stream GD-1. This could come from intrinsic differences from the synthetic and real stream, highlighting the need for consistency in the 'nature' of the task for this method. However, light fine-tuning improve performances and outperform our baselines. Our experiments show encouraging results to further explore meta-learning methods for OCC tasks.
△ Less
Submitted 21 May, 2021; v1 submitted 8 July, 2020;
originally announced July 2020.
Data Analysis Recipes: Products of multivariate Gaussians in Bayesian inferences
Authors:
David W. Hogg,
Adrian M. Price-Whelan,
Boris Leistedt
Abstract:
A product of two Gaussians (or normal distributions) is another Gaussian. That's a valuable and useful fact! Here we use it to derive a refactoring of a common product of multivariate Gaussians: The product of a Gaussian likelihood times a Gaussian prior, where some or all of those parameters enter the likelihood only in the mean and only linearly. That is, a linear, Gaussian, Bayesian model. This…
▽ More
A product of two Gaussians (or normal distributions) is another Gaussian. That's a valuable and useful fact! Here we use it to derive a refactoring of a common product of multivariate Gaussians: The product of a Gaussian likelihood times a Gaussian prior, where some or all of those parameters enter the likelihood only in the mean and only linearly. That is, a linear, Gaussian, Bayesian model. This product of a likelihood times a prior pdf can be refactored into a product of a marginalized likelihood (or a Bayesian evidence) times a posterior pdf, where (in this case) both of these are also Gaussian. The means and variance tensors of the refactored Gaussians are straightforward to obtain as closed-form expressions; here we deliver these expressions, with discussion. The closed-form expressions can be used to speed up and improve the precision of inferences that contain linear parameters with Gaussian priors. We connect these methods to inferences that arise frequently in physics and astronomy.
If all you want is the answer, the question is posed and answered at the beginning of Section 3. We show two toy examples, in the form of worked exercises, in Section 4. The solutions, discussion, and exercises in this Note are aimed at someone who is already familiar with the basic ideas of Bayesian inference and probability.
△ Less
Submitted 28 May, 2020;
originally announced May 2020.
