Understanding step selection analysis through numerical integration
Authors:
Théo Michelot,
Natasha J. Klappstein,
Jonathan R. Potts,
John Fieberg
Abstract:
Step selection functions (SSFs) are flexible models to jointly describe animals' movement and habitat preferences. Their popularity has grown rapidly and extensions have been developed to increase their utility, including various distributions to describe movement constraints, interactions to allow movements to depend on local environmental features, and random effects and latent states to account…
▽ More
Step selection functions (SSFs) are flexible models to jointly describe animals' movement and habitat preferences. Their popularity has grown rapidly and extensions have been developed to increase their utility, including various distributions to describe movement constraints, interactions to allow movements to depend on local environmental features, and random effects and latent states to account for within- and among-individual variability. Although the SSF is a relatively simple statistical model, its presentation has not been consistent in the literature, leading to confusion about model flexibility and interpretation. We believe that part of the confusion has arisen from the conflation of the SSF model with the methods used for parameter estimation. Notably, conditional logistic regression can be used to fit SSFs in exponential form, and this approach is often presented interchangeably with the actual model (the SSF itself). However, reliance on conditional logistic regression reduces model flexibility, and suggests a misleading interpretation of step selection analysis as being equivalent to a case-control study. In this review, we explicitly distinguish between model formulation and inference technique, presenting a coherent framework to fit SSFs based on numerical integration and maximum likelihood estimation. We provide an overview of common numerical integration techniques, and explain how they relate to step selection analyses. This framework unifies different model fitting techniques for SSFs, and opens the way for improved inference. In particular, it makes it straightforward to model movement with distributions outside the exponential family, and to apply different SSF formulations to a data set and compare them with AIC. By separating the model formulation from the inference technique, we hope to clarify many important concepts in step selection analysis.
△ Less
Submitted 29 August, 2023;
originally announced August 2023.
Four principles for improved statistical ecology
Authors:
Gordana Popovic,
Tanya J. Mason,
Tiago A. Marques,
Joanne Potts,
Szymon M. Drobniak,
Rocío Joo,
Res Altwegg,
Carolyn C. I. Burns,
Michael A. McCarthy,
Alison Johnston,
Shinichi Nakagawa,
Louise McMillan,
Kadambari Devarajan,
Patrick l. Taggart,
Alison C. Wunderlich,
Magdalena M. Mair,
Juan Andrés Martínez-Lanfranco,
Malgorzata Lagisz,
Patrice P. Pottier
Abstract:
Increasing attention has been drawn to the misuse of statistical methods over recent years, with particular concern about the prevalence of practices such as poor experimental design, cherry-picking and inadequate reporting. These failures are largely unintentional and no more common in ecology than in other scientific disciplines, with many of them easily remedied given the right guidance.
Orig…
▽ More
Increasing attention has been drawn to the misuse of statistical methods over recent years, with particular concern about the prevalence of practices such as poor experimental design, cherry-picking and inadequate reporting. These failures are largely unintentional and no more common in ecology than in other scientific disciplines, with many of them easily remedied given the right guidance.
Originating from a discussion at the 2020 International Statistical Ecology Conference, we show how ecologists can build their research following four guiding principles for impactful statistical research practices: 1. Define a focused research question, then plan sampling and analysis to answer it; 2. Develop a model that accounts for the distribution and dependence of your data; 3. Emphasise effect sizes to replace statistical significance with ecological relevance; 4. Report your methods and findings in sufficient detail so that your research is valid and reproducible.
Listed in approximate order of importance, these principles provide a framework for experimental design and reporting that guards against unsound practices. Starting with a well-defined research question allows researchers to create an efficient study to answer it, and guards against poor research practices that lead to false positives and poor replicability. Correct and appropriate statistical models give sound conclusions, good reporting practices and a focus on ecological relevance make results impactful and replicable.
Illustrated with an example from a recent study into the impact of disturbance on upland swamps, this paper explains the rationale for the selection and use of effective statistical practices and provides practical guidance for ecologists seeking to improve their use of statistical methods.
△ Less
Submitted 2 February, 2023;
originally announced February 2023.
