Showing 1–2 of 2 results for author: Parkinson, D

Nested sampling for physical scientists

Authors: Greg Ashton, Noam Bernstein, Johannes Buchner, Xi Chen, Gábor Csányi, Andrew Fowlie, Farhan Feroz, Matthew Griffiths, Will Handley, Michael Habeck, Edward Higson, Michael Hobson, Anthony Lasenby, David Parkinson, Livia B. Pártay, Matthew Pitkin, Doris Schneider, Joshua S. Speagle, Leah South, John Veitch, Philipp Wacker, David J. Wales, David Yallup

Abstract: We review Skilling's nested sampling (NS) algorithm for Bayesian inference and more broadly multi-dimensional integration. After recapitulating the principles of NS, we survey developments in implementing efficient NS algorithms in practice in high-dimensions, including methods for sampling from the so-called constrained prior. We outline the ways in which NS may be applied and describe the applic… ▽ More We review Skilling's nested sampling (NS) algorithm for Bayesian inference and more broadly multi-dimensional integration. After recapitulating the principles of NS, we survey developments in implementing efficient NS algorithms in practice in high-dimensions, including methods for sampling from the so-called constrained prior. We outline the ways in which NS may be applied and describe the application of NS in three scientific fields in which the algorithm has proved to be useful: cosmology, gravitational-wave astronomy, and materials science. We close by making recommendations for best practice when using NS and by summarizing potential limitations and optimizations of NS. △ Less

Submitted 31 May, 2022; originally announced May 2022.

Comments: 20 pages + supplementary information, 5 figures. preprint version; published version at https://www.nature.com/articles/s43586-022-00121-x

Journal ref: Nature Reviews Methods Primers volume 2, Article number: 39 (2022)

Statistical Classification Techniques for Photometric Supernova Typing

Authors: James Newling, Melvin Varughese, Bruce A. Bassett, Heather Campbell, Renée Hlozek, Martin Kunz, Hubert Lampeitl, Bryony Martin, Robert Nichol, David Parkinson, Mathew Smith

Abstract: Future photometric supernova surveys will produce vastly more candidates than can be followed up spectroscopically, highlighting the need for effective classification methods based on lightcurves alone. Here we introduce boosting and kernel density estimation techniques which have minimal astrophysical input, and compare their performance on 20,000 simulated Dark Energy Survey lightcurves. We demo… ▽ More Future photometric supernova surveys will produce vastly more candidates than can be followed up spectroscopically, highlighting the need for effective classification methods based on lightcurves alone. Here we introduce boosting and kernel density estimation techniques which have minimal astrophysical input, and compare their performance on 20,000 simulated Dark Energy Survey lightcurves. We demonstrate that these methods are comparable to the best template fitting methods currently used, and in particular do not require the redshift of the host galaxy or candidate. However both methods require a training sample that is representative of the full population, so typical spectroscopic supernova subsamples will lead to poor performance. To enable the full potential of such blind methods, we recommend that representative training samples should be used and so specific attention should be given to their creation in the design phase of future photometric surveys. △ Less

Submitted 8 October, 2010; v1 submitted 5 October, 2010; originally announced October 2010.

Comments: 19 pages, 41 figures. No changes. Additional material and summary video available at http://cosmoaims.wordpress.com/2010/09/30/boosting-for-supernova-classification/

Journal ref: Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 413, 2011