Skip to main content

Showing 1–3 of 3 results for author: Parady, G

Searching in archive stat. Search in all archives.
.
  1. arXiv:2212.08761  [pdf

    stat.AP

    Evaluating the Impact of Automated Vehicles on Residential Location Distribution using Activity-based Accessibility: A Case Study of Japanese Regional Areas

    Authors: Lichen Luo, Giancarlos Parady, Kiyoshi Takami

    Abstract: Automated Vehicles (AVs) are expected to disrupt the transport sector in the future. Extensive research efforts have been dedicated to studying its potential implications. However, the existing literature is yet limited regarding the long-term impacts. To fill this gap, this paper estimates and validates a residential location choice model to evaluate the impacts of AVs on residential location dis… ▽ More

    Submitted 16 December, 2022; originally announced December 2022.

    Comments: Submitted to and accepted by Transportation Research Board Annual Conference, 2023

  2. The effectiveness of using Google Maps Location History data to detect joint activities in social networks

    Authors: Giancarlos Parady, Keita Suzuki, Yuki Oyama, Makoto Chikaraishi

    Abstract: This study evaluates the effectiveness of using Google Maps Location History data to identify joint activities in social networks. To do so, an experiment was conducted where participants were asked to execute daily schedules designed to simulate daily travel incorporating joint activities. For Android devices, detection rates for 4-person group activities ranged from 22% under the strictest spati… ▽ More

    Submitted 15 August, 2022; originally announced August 2022.

    Comments: 26 pages, 8 tables, 7 figures

    Journal ref: Travel Behaviour and Society 30 (2023) 344-357

  3. Size Matters: The Use and Misuse of Statistical Significance in Discrete Choice Models in the Transportation Academic Literature

    Authors: Giancarlos Parady, Kay W. Axhausen

    Abstract: In this paper we review the academic transportation literature published between 2014 and 2018 to evaluate where the field stands regarding the use and misuse of statistical significance in empirical analysis, with a focus on discrete choice models. Our results show that 39% of studies explained model results exclusively based on the sign of the coefficient, 67% of studies did not distinguish stat… ▽ More

    Submitted 12 August, 2022; originally announced August 2022.

    Comments: 14 pages, 1 table, 0 figures