Showing 1–9 of 9 results for author: Oh, R

Optimal relativities in a modified Bonus-Malus system with long memory transition rules and frequency-severity dependence

Authors: Jae Youn Ahn, Eric C. K. Cheung, Rosy Oh, Jae-Kyung Woo

Abstract: In the classical Bonus-Malus System (BMS) in automobile insurance, the premium for the next year is adjusted according to the policyholder's claim history (particularly frequency) in the previous year. Some variations of the classical BMS have been considered by taking more of driver's claim experience into account to better assess individual's risk. Nevertheless, we note that in practice it is co… ▽ More In the classical Bonus-Malus System (BMS) in automobile insurance, the premium for the next year is adjusted according to the policyholder's claim history (particularly frequency) in the previous year. Some variations of the classical BMS have been considered by taking more of driver's claim experience into account to better assess individual's risk. Nevertheless, we note that in practice it is common for a BMS to adopt transition rules according to the claim history for the past multiple years in countries such as Belgium, Italy, Korea, and Singapore. In this paper, we revisit a modified BMS which was briefly introduced in Lemaire (1995) and Pitrebois et al. (2003a). Specifically, such a BMS extends the number of Bonus-Malus (BM) levels due to an additional component in the transition rules representing the number of consecutive claim-free years. With the extended BM levels granting more reasonable bonus to careful drivers, this paper investigates the transition rules in a more rigorous manner, and provides the optimal BM relativities under various statistical model assumptions including the frequency random effect model and the dependent collective risk model. Also, numerical analysis of a real data set is provided to compare the classical BMS and our proposed BMS. △ Less

Submitted 6 June, 2021; v1 submitted 1 June, 2021; originally announced June 2021.

A copula transformation in multivariate mixed discrete-continuous models

Authors: Jae Youn Ahn, Sebastian Fuchs, Rosy Oh

Abstract: Copulas allow a flexible and simultaneous modeling of complicated dependence structures together with various marginal distributions. Especially if the density function can be represented as the product of the marginal density functions and the copula density function, this leads to both an intuitive interpretation of the conditional distribution and convenient estimation procedures. However, this… ▽ More Copulas allow a flexible and simultaneous modeling of complicated dependence structures together with various marginal distributions. Especially if the density function can be represented as the product of the marginal density functions and the copula density function, this leads to both an intuitive interpretation of the conditional distribution and convenient estimation procedures. However, this is no longer the case for copula models with mixed discrete and continuous marginal distributions, because the corresponding density function cannot be decomposed so nicely. In this paper, we introduce a copula transformation method that allows to represent the density function of a distribution with mixed discrete and continuous marginals as the product of the marginal probability mass/density functions and the copula density function. With the proposed method, conditional distributions can be described analytically and the computational complexity in the estimation procedure can be reduced depending on the type of copula used. △ Less

Submitted 27 August, 2020; originally announced August 2020.

A Bivariate Compound Dynamic Contagion Process for Cyber Insurance

Authors: Jiwook Jang, Rosy Oh

Abstract: As corporates and governments become more digital, they become vulnerable to various forms of cyber attack. Cyber insurance products have been used as risk management tools, yet their pricing does not reflect actual risk, including that of multiple, catastrophic and contagious losses. For the modelling of aggregate losses from cyber events, in this paper we introduce a bivariate compound dynamic c… ▽ More As corporates and governments become more digital, they become vulnerable to various forms of cyber attack. Cyber insurance products have been used as risk management tools, yet their pricing does not reflect actual risk, including that of multiple, catastrophic and contagious losses. For the modelling of aggregate losses from cyber events, in this paper we introduce a bivariate compound dynamic contagion process, where the bivariate dynamic contagion process is a point process that includes both externally excited joint jumps, which are distributed according to a shot noise Cox process and two separate self-excited jumps, which are distributed according to the branching structure of a Hawkes process with an exponential fertility rate, respectively. We analyse the theoretical distributional properties for these processes systematically, based on the piecewise deterministic Markov process developed by Davis (1984) and the univariate dynamic contagion process theory developed by Dassios and Zhao (2011). The analytic expression of the Laplace transform of the compound process and its moments are presented, which have the potential to be applicable to a variety of problems in credit, insurance, market and other operational risks. As an application of this process, we provide insurance premium calculations based on its moments. Numerical examples show that this compound process can be used for the modelling of aggregate losses from cyber events. We also provide the simulation algorithm for statistical analysis, further business applications and research. △ Less

Submitted 12 June, 2020; originally announced July 2020.

On a Multi-Year Microlevel Collective Risk Model

Authors: Rosy Oh, Himchan Jeong, Jae Youn Ahn, Emiliano A. Valdez

Abstract: For a typical insurance portfolio, the claims process for a short period, typically one year, is characterized by observing frequency of claims together with the associated claims severities. The collective risk model describes this portfolio as a random sum of the aggregation of the claim amounts. In the classical framework, for simplicity, the claim frequency and claim severities are assumed to… ▽ More For a typical insurance portfolio, the claims process for a short period, typically one year, is characterized by observing frequency of claims together with the associated claims severities. The collective risk model describes this portfolio as a random sum of the aggregation of the claim amounts. In the classical framework, for simplicity, the claim frequency and claim severities are assumed to be mutually independent. However, there is a growing interest in relaxing this independence assumption which is more realistic and useful for the practical insurance ratemaking. While the common thread has been capturing the dependence between frequency and aggregate severity within a single period, the work of Oh et al. (2020a) provides an interesting extension to the addition of capturing dependence among individual severities. In this paper, we extend these works within a framework where we have a portfolio of microlevel frequencies and severities for multiple years. This allows us to develop a factor copula model framework that captures various types of dependence between claim frequencies and claim severities over multiple years. It is therefore a clear extension of earlier works on one-year dependent frequency-severity models and on random effects model for capturing serial dependence of claims. We focus on the results using a family of elliptical copulas to model the dependence. The paper further describes how to calibrate the proposed model using illustrative claims data arising from a Singapore insurance company. The estimated results provide strong evidence of all forms of dependencies captured by our model. △ Less

Submitted 10 June, 2020; originally announced June 2020.

Designing a Bonus-Malus system reflecting the claim size under the dependent frequency-severity model

Authors: Rosy Oh, Joseph H. T. Kim, Jae Youn Ahn

Abstract: In auto insurance, a Bonus-Malus System (BMS) is commonly used as a posteriori risk classification mechanism to set the premium for the next contract period based on a policyholder's claim history. Even though recent literature reports evidence of a significant dependence between frequency and severity, the current BMS practice is to use a frequency-based transition rule while ignoring severity in… ▽ More In auto insurance, a Bonus-Malus System (BMS) is commonly used as a posteriori risk classification mechanism to set the premium for the next contract period based on a policyholder's claim history. Even though recent literature reports evidence of a significant dependence between frequency and severity, the current BMS practice is to use a frequency-based transition rule while ignoring severity information. Although Oh et al. (2019) claim that the frequency-driven BMS transition rule can accommodate the dependence between frequency and severity, their proposal is only a partial solution, as the transition rule still completely ignores the claim severity and is unable to penalize large claims. In this study, we propose to use the BMS with a transition rule based on both frequency and size of claim, based on the bivariate random effect model, which conveniently allows dependence between frequency and severity. We analytically derive the optimal relativities under the proposed BMS framework and show that the proposed BMS outperforms the existing frequency-driven BMS. Later numerical experiments are also provided using both hypothetical and actual datasets in order to assess the effect of various dependencies on the BMS risk classification and confirm our theoretical findings. △ Less

Submitted 3 March, 2020; originally announced March 2020.

Predictive Risk Analysis in Collective Risk Model: Choices between Historical Frequency and Aggregate Severity

Authors: Rosy Oh, Youngju Lee, Dan Zhu, Jae Youn Ahn

Abstract: Typical risk classification procedure in insurance is consists of a priori risk classification determined by observable risk characteristics, and a posteriori risk classification where the premium is adjusted to reflect the policyholder's claim history. While using the full claim history data is optimal in a posteriori risk classification procedure, i.e. giving premium estimators with the minimal… ▽ More Typical risk classification procedure in insurance is consists of a priori risk classification determined by observable risk characteristics, and a posteriori risk classification where the premium is adjusted to reflect the policyholder's claim history. While using the full claim history data is optimal in a posteriori risk classification procedure, i.e. giving premium estimators with the minimal variances, some insurance sectors, however, only use partial information of the claim history for determining the appropriate premium to charge. Classical examples include that auto insurances premium are determined by the claim frequency data and workers' compensation insurances are based on the aggregate severity. The motivation for such practice is to have a simplified and efficient posteriori risk classification procedure which is customized to the involved insurance policy. This paper compares the relative efficiency of the two simplified posteriori risk classifications, i.e. based on frequency versus severity, and provides the mathematical framework to assist practitioners in choosing the most appropriate practice. △ Less

Submitted 2 February, 2020; originally announced February 2020.

Double-Counting Problem of the Bonus-Malus System

Authors: Rosy Oh, Kyung Suk Lee, Sojung C. Park, Jae Youn Ahn

Abstract: The bonus-malus system (BMS) is a widely used premium adjustment mechanism based on policyholder's claim history. Most auto insurance BMSs assume that policyholders in the same bonus-malus (BM) level share the same a posteriori risk adjustment. This system reflects the policyholder's claim history in a relatively simple manner. However, the typical system follows a single BM scale and is known to… ▽ More The bonus-malus system (BMS) is a widely used premium adjustment mechanism based on policyholder's claim history. Most auto insurance BMSs assume that policyholders in the same bonus-malus (BM) level share the same a posteriori risk adjustment. This system reflects the policyholder's claim history in a relatively simple manner. However, the typical system follows a single BM scale and is known to suffer from the double-counting problem: policyholders in the high-risk classes in terms of a priori characteristics are penalized too severely (Taylor, 1997; Pitrebois et al., 2003). Thus, Pitrebois et al. (2003) proposed a new system with multiple BM scales based on the a priori characteristics. While this multiple-scale BMS removes the double-counting problem, it loses the prime benefit of simplicity. Alternatively, we argue that the double-counting problem can be viewed as an inefficiency of the optimization process. Furthermore, we show that the double-counting problem can be resolved by fully optimizing the BMS setting, but retaining the traditional BMS format. △ Less

Submitted 22 October, 2019; originally announced October 2019.

On Copula-based Collective Risk Models

Authors: Rosy Oh, Jae Youn Ahn, Woojoo Lee

Abstract: Several collective risk models have recently been proposed by relaxing the widely used but controversial assumption of independence between claim frequency and severity. Approaches include the bivariate copula model, random effect model, and two-part frequency-severity model. This study focuses on the copula approach to develop collective risk models that allow a flexible dependence structure for… ▽ More Several collective risk models have recently been proposed by relaxing the widely used but controversial assumption of independence between claim frequency and severity. Approaches include the bivariate copula model, random effect model, and two-part frequency-severity model. This study focuses on the copula approach to develop collective risk models that allow a flexible dependence structure for frequency and severity. We first revisit the bivariate copula method for frequency and average severity. After examining the inherent difficulties of the bivariate copula model, we alternatively propose modeling the dependence of frequency and individual severities using multivariate Gaussian and t-copula functions. The proposed copula models have computational advantages and provide intuitive interpretations for the dependence structure. Our analytical findings are illustrated by analyzing automobile insurance data. △ Less

Submitted 9 June, 2019; originally announced June 2019.

Implementation of Frequency-Severity Association in BMS Ratemaking

Authors: Rosy Oh, Peng Shi, Jae Youn Ahn

Abstract: A Bonus-Malus System (BMS) in insurance is a premium adjustment mechanism widely used in a posteriori ratemaking process to set the premium for the next contract period based on a policyholder's claim history. The current practice in BMS implementation relies on the assumption of independence between claim frequency and severity, despite the fact that a series of recent studies report evidence of… ▽ More A Bonus-Malus System (BMS) in insurance is a premium adjustment mechanism widely used in a posteriori ratemaking process to set the premium for the next contract period based on a policyholder's claim history. The current practice in BMS implementation relies on the assumption of independence between claim frequency and severity, despite the fact that a series of recent studies report evidence of a significant frequency-severity relationship, particularly in automobile insurance. To address this discrepancy, we propose a copula-based correlated random effects model to accommodate the dependence between claim frequency and severity, and further illustrate how to incorporate such dependence into the current BMS. We derive analytical solutions to the optimal relativities under the proposed framework and provide numerical experiments based on real data analysis to assess the effect of frequency-severity dependence in BMS ratemaking. △ Less

Submitted 14 March, 2019; originally announced March 2019.