-
Predicting the trajectory of intracranial pressure in patients with traumatic brain injury: evaluation of a foundation model for time series
Authors:
Florian D. van Leeuwen,
Shubhayu Bhattacharyay,
Alex Carriero,
Ethan Jacob Moyer,
Richard Moberg
Abstract:
Patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) often experience pathological increases in intracranial pressure (ICP), leading to intracranial hypertension (tIH), a common and serious complication. Early warning of an impending rise in ICP could potentially improve patient outcomes by enabling preemptive clinical intervention. However, the limited availability of patient data poses a challenge in deve…
▽ More
Patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) often experience pathological increases in intracranial pressure (ICP), leading to intracranial hypertension (tIH), a common and serious complication. Early warning of an impending rise in ICP could potentially improve patient outcomes by enabling preemptive clinical intervention. However, the limited availability of patient data poses a challenge in developing reliable prediction models. In this study, we aim to determine whether foundation models, which leverage transfer learning, may offer a promising solution.
△ Less
Submitted 18 October, 2024;
originally announced October 2024.
-
Diagnosing added value of convection-permitting regional models using precipitation event identification and tracking
Authors:
Won Chang,
Jiali Wang,
Julian Marohnic,
Rao Kotamarthi,
Elisabeth J. Moyer
Abstract:
Dynamical downscaling with high-resolution regional climate models may offer the possibility of realistically reproducing precipitation and weather events in climate simulations. As resolutions fall to order kilometers, the use of explicit rather than parametrized convection may offer even greater fidelity. However, these increased model resolutions both allow and require increasingly complex diag…
▽ More
Dynamical downscaling with high-resolution regional climate models may offer the possibility of realistically reproducing precipitation and weather events in climate simulations. As resolutions fall to order kilometers, the use of explicit rather than parametrized convection may offer even greater fidelity. However, these increased model resolutions both allow and require increasingly complex diagnostics for evaluating model fidelity. In this study we use a suite of dynamically downscaled simulations of the summertime U.S. (WRF driven by NCEP) with systematic variations in parameters and treatment of convection as a test case for evaluation of model precipitation. In particular, we use a novel rainstorm identification and tracking algorithm that allocates essentially all rainfall to individual precipitation events (Chang et al. 2016). This approach allows multiple insights, including that, at least in these runs, model wet bias is driven by excessive areal extent of precipitating events. Biases are time-dependent, producing excessive diurnal cycle amplitude. We show that this effect is produced not by new production of events but by excessive enlargement of long-lived precipitation events during daytime, and that in the domain average, precipitation biases appear best represented as additive offsets. Of all model configurations evaluated, convection-permitting simulations most consistently reduced biases in precipitation event characteristics.
△ Less
Submitted 11 December, 2017;
originally announced December 2017.
-
Estimating trends in the global mean temperature record
Authors:
Andrew Poppick,
Elisabeth J. Moyer,
Michael L. Stein
Abstract:
Given uncertainties in physical theory and numerical climate simulations, the historical temperature record is often used as a source of empirical information about climate change. Many historical trend analyses appear to deemphasize physical and statistical assumptions: examples include regression models that treat time rather than radiative forcing as the relevant covariate and time series metho…
▽ More
Given uncertainties in physical theory and numerical climate simulations, the historical temperature record is often used as a source of empirical information about climate change. Many historical trend analyses appear to deemphasize physical and statistical assumptions: examples include regression models that treat time rather than radiative forcing as the relevant covariate and time series methods that account for internal variability nonparametrically. However, given a limited record and the presence of internal variability, estimating radiatively forced historical temperature trends necessarily requires assumptions. Ostensibly empirical methods can involve an inherent conflict in assumptions: they require data records that are short enough for naive trend models to apply but long enough for internal variability to be accounted for. In the context of global mean temperatures, methods that deemphasize assumptions can therefore produce misleading inferences, because the twentieth century trend is complex and the scale of correlation is long relative to the data length. We illustrate how a simple but physically motivated trend model can provide better-fitting and more broadly applicable trend estimates and can address a wider array of questions. The model allows one to distinguish, within a single framework, between uncertainties in the shorter-term versus longer-term response to radiative forcing, with implications not only on historical trends but also on uncertainties in future projections. We also investigate the consequence on inferred uncertainties of the choice of a statistical description of internal variability. While nonparametric methods may seem to avoid making explicit assumptions, we demonstrate how even misspecified parametric methods, if attuned to important characteristics of internal variability, can result in more accurate statements about trend uncertainty.
△ Less
Submitted 14 May, 2017; v1 submitted 13 July, 2016;
originally announced July 2016.
-
Changes in Spatio-temporal Precipitation Patterns in Changing Climate Conditions
Authors:
Won Chang,
Michael L. Stein,
Jiali Wang,
V. Rao Kotamarthi,
Elisabeth J. Moyer
Abstract:
Climate models robustly imply that some significant change in precipitation patterns will occur. Models consistently project that the intensity of individual precipitation events increases by approximately 6-7%/K, following the increase in atmospheric water content, but that total precipitation increases by a lesser amount (1-2 %/K in the global average in transient runs). Some other aspect of pre…
▽ More
Climate models robustly imply that some significant change in precipitation patterns will occur. Models consistently project that the intensity of individual precipitation events increases by approximately 6-7%/K, following the increase in atmospheric water content, but that total precipitation increases by a lesser amount (1-2 %/K in the global average in transient runs). Some other aspect of precipitation events must then change to compensate for this difference. We develop here a new methodology for identifying individual rainstorms and studying their physical characteristics - including starting location, intensity, spatial extent, duration, and trajectory - that allows identifying that compensating mechanism. We apply this technique to precipitation over the contiguous U.S. from both radar-based data products and high-resolution model runs simulating 80 years of business-as-usual warming. In model studies, we find that the dominant compensating mechanism is a reduction of storm size. In summer, rainstorms become more intense but smaller, in winter, rainstorm shrinkage still dominates, but storms also become less numerous and shorter duration. These results imply that flood impacts from climate change will be less severe than would be expected from changes in precipitation intensity alone. We show also that projected changes are smaller than model-observation biases, implying that the best means of incorporating them into impact assessments is via "data-driven simulations" that apply model-projected changes to observational data. We therefore develop a simulation algorithm that statistically describes model changes in precipitation characteristics and adjusts data accordingly, and show that, especially for summertime precipitation, it outperforms simulation approaches that do not include spatial information.
△ Less
Submitted 24 May, 2016; v1 submitted 6 January, 2016;
originally announced January 2016.
-
Estimating changes in temperature extremes from millennial scale climate simulations using generalized extreme value (GEV) distributions
Authors:
Whitney K. Huang,
Michael L. Stein,
David J. McInerney,
Shanshan Sun,
Elisabeth J. Moyer
Abstract:
Changes in extreme weather may produce some of the largest societal impacts of anthropogenic climate change. However, it is intrinsically difficult to estimate changes in extreme events from the short observational record. In this work we use millennial runs from the CCSM3 in equilibrated pre-industrial and possible future conditions to examine both how extremes change in this model and how well t…
▽ More
Changes in extreme weather may produce some of the largest societal impacts of anthropogenic climate change. However, it is intrinsically difficult to estimate changes in extreme events from the short observational record. In this work we use millennial runs from the CCSM3 in equilibrated pre-industrial and possible future conditions to examine both how extremes change in this model and how well these changes can be estimated as a function of run length. We estimate changes to distributions of future temperature extremes (annual minima and annual maxima) in the contiguous United States by fitting generalized extreme value (GEV) distributions. Using 1000-year pre-industrial and future time series, we show that the magnitude of warm extremes largely shifts in accordance with mean shifts in summertime temperatures. In contrast, cold extremes warm more than mean shifts in wintertime temperatures, but changes in GEV location parameters are largely explainable by mean shifts combined with reduced wintertime temperature variability. In addition, changes in the spread and shape of the GEV distributions of cold extremes at inland locations can lead to discernible changes in tail behavior. We then examine uncertainties that result from using shorter model runs. In principle, the GEV distribution provides theoretical justification to predict infrequent events using time series shorter than the recurrence frequency of those events. To investigate how well this approach works in practice, we estimate 20-, 50-, and 100-year extreme events using segments of varying lengths. We find that even using GEV distributions, time series that are of comparable or shorter length than the return period of interest can lead to very poor estimates. These results suggest caution when attempting to use short observational time series or model runs to infer infrequent extremes.
△ Less
Submitted 14 June, 2016; v1 submitted 29 December, 2015;
originally announced December 2015.
-
Temperatures in transient climates: improved methods for simulations with evolving temporal covariances
Authors:
Andrew Poppick,
David J. McInerney,
Elisabeth J. Moyer,
Michael L. Stein
Abstract:
Future climate change impacts depend on temperatures not only through changes in their means but also through changes in their variability. General circulation models (GCMs) predict changes in both means and variability; however, GCM output should not be used directly as simulations for impacts assessments because GCMs do not fully reproduce present-day temperature distributions. This paper addres…
▽ More
Future climate change impacts depend on temperatures not only through changes in their means but also through changes in their variability. General circulation models (GCMs) predict changes in both means and variability; however, GCM output should not be used directly as simulations for impacts assessments because GCMs do not fully reproduce present-day temperature distributions. This paper addresses an ensuing need for simulations of future temperatures that combine both the observational record and GCM projections of changes in means and temporal covariances. Our perspective is that such simulations should be based on transforming observations to account for GCM projected changes, in contrast to methods that transform GCM output to account for discrepancies with observations. Our methodology is designed for simulating transient (non-stationary) climates, which are evolving in response to changes in CO$_2$ concentrations (as is the Earth at present). This work builds on previously described methods for simulating equilibrium (stationary) climates. Since the proposed simulation relies on GCM projected changes in covariance, we describe a statistical model for the evolution of temporal covariances in a GCM under future forcing scenarios, and apply this model to an ensemble of runs from one GCM, CCSM3. We find that, at least in CCSM3, changes in the local covariance structure can be explained as a function of the regional mean change in temperature and the rate of change of warming. This feature means that the statistical model can be used to emulate the evolving covariance structure of GCM temperatures under scenarios for which the GCM has not been run. When combined with an emulator for mean temperature, our methodology can simulate evolving temperatures under such scenarios, in a way that accounts for projections of changes while still retaining fidelity with the observational record.
△ Less
Submitted 2 November, 2015; v1 submitted 2 July, 2015;
originally announced July 2015.
