Imputation of Missing Streamflow Data at Multiple Gauging Stations in Benin Republic
Authors:
Rendani Mbuvha,
Julien Yise Peniel Adounkpe,
Wilson Tsakane Mongwe,
Mandela Houngnibo,
Nathaniel Newlands,
Tshilidzi Marwala
Abstract:
Streamflow observation data is vital for flood monitoring, agricultural, and settlement planning. However, such streamflow data are commonly plagued with missing observations due to various causes such as harsh environmental conditions and constrained operational resources. This problem is often more pervasive in under-resourced areas such as Sub-Saharan Africa. In this work, we reconstruct stream…
▽ More
Streamflow observation data is vital for flood monitoring, agricultural, and settlement planning. However, such streamflow data are commonly plagued with missing observations due to various causes such as harsh environmental conditions and constrained operational resources. This problem is often more pervasive in under-resourced areas such as Sub-Saharan Africa. In this work, we reconstruct streamflow time series data through bias correction of the GEOGloWS ECMWF streamflow service (GESS) forecasts at ten river gauging stations in Benin Republic. We perform bias correction by fitting Quantile Mapping, Gaussian Process, and Elastic Net regression in a constrained training period. We show by simulating missingness in a testing period that GESS forecasts have a significant bias that results in low predictive skill over the ten Beninese stations. Our findings suggest that overall bias correction by Elastic Net and Gaussian Process regression achieves superior skill relative to traditional imputation by Random Forest, k-Nearest Neighbour, and GESS lookup. The findings of this work provide a basis for integrating global GESS streamflow data into operational early-warning decision-making systems (e.g., flood alert) in countries vulnerable to drought and flooding due to extreme weather events.
△ Less
Submitted 17 November, 2022;
originally announced November 2022.
Antithetic Riemannian Manifold And Quantum-Inspired Hamiltonian Monte Carlo
Authors:
Wilson Tsakane Mongwe,
Rendani Mbuvha,
Tshilidzi Marwala
Abstract:
Markov Chain Monte Carlo inference of target posterior distributions in machine learning is predominately conducted via Hamiltonian Monte Carlo and its variants. This is due to Hamiltonian Monte Carlo based samplers ability to suppress random-walk behaviour. As with other Markov Chain Monte Carlo methods, Hamiltonian Monte Carlo produces auto-correlated samples which results in high variance in th…
▽ More
Markov Chain Monte Carlo inference of target posterior distributions in machine learning is predominately conducted via Hamiltonian Monte Carlo and its variants. This is due to Hamiltonian Monte Carlo based samplers ability to suppress random-walk behaviour. As with other Markov Chain Monte Carlo methods, Hamiltonian Monte Carlo produces auto-correlated samples which results in high variance in the estimators, and low effective sample size rates in the generated samples. Adding antithetic sampling to Hamiltonian Monte Carlo has been previously shown to produce higher effective sample rates compared to vanilla Hamiltonian Monte Carlo. In this paper, we present new algorithms which are antithetic versions of Riemannian Manifold Hamiltonian Monte Carlo and Quantum-Inspired Hamiltonian Monte Carlo. The Riemannian Manifold Hamiltonian Monte Carlo algorithm improves on Hamiltonian Monte Carlo by taking into account the local geometry of the target, which is beneficial for target densities that may exhibit strong correlations in the parameters. Quantum-Inspired Hamiltonian Monte Carlo is based on quantum particles that can have random mass. Quantum-Inspired Hamiltonian Monte Carlo uses a random mass matrix which results in better sampling than Hamiltonian Monte Carlo on spiky and multi-modal distributions such as jump diffusion processes. The analysis is performed on jump diffusion process using real world financial market data, as well as on real world benchmark classification tasks using Bayesian logistic regression.
△ Less
Submitted 5 July, 2021;
originally announced July 2021.
