Detecting changes in slope with an $L_0$ penalty
Authors:
Robert Maidstone,
Paul Fearnhead,
Adam Letchford
Abstract:
Whilst there are many approaches to detecting changes in mean for a univariate time-series, the problem of detecting multiple changes in slope has comparatively been ignored. Part of the reason for this is that detecting changes in slope is much more challenging. For example, simple binary segmentation procedures do not work for this problem, whilst efficient dynamic programming methods that work…
▽ More
Whilst there are many approaches to detecting changes in mean for a univariate time-series, the problem of detecting multiple changes in slope has comparatively been ignored. Part of the reason for this is that detecting changes in slope is much more challenging. For example, simple binary segmentation procedures do not work for this problem, whilst efficient dynamic programming methods that work well for the change in mean problem cannot be directly used for detecting changes in slope. We present a novel dynamic programming approach, CPOP, for finding the "best" continuous piecewise-linear fit to data. We define best based on a criterion that measures fit to data using the residual sum of squares, but penalises complexity based on an $L_0$ penalty on changes in slope. We show that using such a criterion is more reliable at estimating changepoint locations than approaches that penalise complexity using an $L_1$ penalty. Empirically CPOP has good computational properties, and can analyse a time-series with over 10,000 observations and over 100 changes in a few minutes. Our method is used to analyse data on the motion of bacteria, and provides fits to the data that both have substantially smaller residual sum of squares and are more parsimonious than two competing approaches.
△ Less
Submitted 3 February, 2017; v1 submitted 6 January, 2017;
originally announced January 2017.
On Optimal Multiple Changepoint Algorithms for Large Data
Authors:
Robert Maidstone,
Toby Hocking,
Guillem Rigaill,
Paul Fearnhead
Abstract:
There is an increasing need for algorithms that can accurately detect changepoints in long time-series, or equivalent, data. Many common approaches to detecting changepoints, for example based on penalised likelihood or minimum description length, can be formulated in terms of minimising a cost over segmentations. Dynamic programming methods exist to solve this minimisation problem exactly, but th…
▽ More
There is an increasing need for algorithms that can accurately detect changepoints in long time-series, or equivalent, data. Many common approaches to detecting changepoints, for example based on penalised likelihood or minimum description length, can be formulated in terms of minimising a cost over segmentations. Dynamic programming methods exist to solve this minimisation problem exactly, but these tend to scale at least quadratically in the length of the time-series. Algorithms, such as Binary Segmentation, exist that have a computational cost that is close to linear in the length of the time-series, but these are not guaranteed to find the optimal segmentation. Recently pruning ideas have been suggested that can speed up the dynamic programming algorithms, whilst still being guaranteed to find true minimum of the cost function. Here we extend these pruning methods, and introduce two new algorithms for segmenting data, FPOP and SNIP. Empirical results show that FPOP is substantially faster than existing dynamic programming methods, and unlike the existing methods its computational efficiency is robust to the number of changepoints in the data. We evaluate the method at detecting Copy Number Variations and observe that FPOP has a computational cost that is competitive with that of Binary Segmentation.
△ Less
Submitted 5 September, 2014;
originally announced September 2014.
