Using R formulae to test for main effects in the presence of higher-order interactions
Authors:
Roger Levy
Abstract:
Traditional analysis of variance (ANOVA) software allows researchers to test for the significance of main effects in the presence of interactions without exposure to the details of how the software encodes main effects and interactions to make these tests possible. Now that increasing numbers of researchers are using more general regression software, including mixed-effects models, to supplant the…
▽ More
Traditional analysis of variance (ANOVA) software allows researchers to test for the significance of main effects in the presence of interactions without exposure to the details of how the software encodes main effects and interactions to make these tests possible. Now that increasing numbers of researchers are using more general regression software, including mixed-effects models, to supplant the traditional uses of ANOVA software, conducting such tests generally requires greater knowledge of how to parameterize one's statistical models appropriately. Here I present information on how to conduct such tests using R, including relevant background information and worked examples.
△ Less
Submitted 15 January, 2018; v1 submitted 8 May, 2014;
originally announced May 2014.
Joint Modeling and Registration of Cell Populations in Cohorts of High-Dimensional Flow Cytometric Data
Authors:
Saumyadipta Pyne,
Kui Wang,
Jonathan Irish,
Pablo Tamayo,
Marc-Danie Nazaire,
Tarn Duong,
Sharon Lee,
Shu-Kay Ng,
David Hafler,
Ronald Levy,
Garry Nolan,
Jill Mesirov,
Geoffrey J. McLachlan
Abstract:
In systems biomedicine, an experimenter encounters different potential sources of variation in data such as individual samples, multiple experimental conditions, and multi-variable network-level responses. In multiparametric cytometry, which is often used for analyzing patient samples, such issues are critical. While computational methods can identify cell populations in individual samples, withou…
▽ More
In systems biomedicine, an experimenter encounters different potential sources of variation in data such as individual samples, multiple experimental conditions, and multi-variable network-level responses. In multiparametric cytometry, which is often used for analyzing patient samples, such issues are critical. While computational methods can identify cell populations in individual samples, without the ability to automatically match them across samples, it is difficult to compare and characterize the populations in typical experiments, such as those responding to various stimulations or distinctive of particular patients or time-points, especially when there are many samples. Joint Clustering and Matching (JCM) is a multi-level framework for simultaneous modeling and registration of populations across a cohort. JCM models every population with a robust multivariate probability distribution. Simultaneously, JCM fits a random-effects model to construct an overall batch template -- used for registering populations across samples, and classifying new samples. By tackling systems-level variation, JCM supports practical biomedical applications involving large cohorts.
△ Less
Submitted 31 May, 2013;
originally announced May 2013.
