Showing 1–2 of 2 results for author: Levman, J
-
Test Sensitivity in the Computer-Aided Detection of Breast Cancer from Clinical Mammographic Screening: a Meta-analysis
Authors:
Jacob Levman
Abstract:
Objectives: To assess evaluative methodologies for comparative measurements of test sensitivity in clinical mammographic screening trials of computer-aided detection (CAD) technologies. Materials and Methods: This meta-analysis was performed by analytically reviewing the relevant literature on the clinical application of computer-aided detection (CAD) technologies as part of a breast cancer screen…
▽ More
Objectives: To assess evaluative methodologies for comparative measurements of test sensitivity in clinical mammographic screening trials of computer-aided detection (CAD) technologies. Materials and Methods: This meta-analysis was performed by analytically reviewing the relevant literature on the clinical application of computer-aided detection (CAD) technologies as part of a breast cancer screening program based on x-ray mammography. Each clinical study's method for measuring the CAD system's improvement in test sensitivity is examined in this meta-analysis. The impact of the chosen sensitivity measurement on the study's conclusions are analyzed. Results: This meta-analysis demonstrates that some studies have inappropriately compared sensitivity measurements between control groups and CAD enabled groups. The inappropriate comparison of control groups and CAD enabled groups can lead to an underestimation of the benefits of the clinical application of computer-aided detection technologies. Conclusions: The potential for the sensitivity measurement issues raised in this meta-analysis to alter the conclusions of multiple existing large clinical studies is discussed. Two large scale studies are substantially affected by the analysis provided in this study and this meta-analysis demonstrates that computer-aided detection systems are successfully assisting in the breast cancer screening process.
△ Less
Submitted 6 February, 2013;
originally announced February 2013.
-
A Statistical Significance Simulation Study for the General Scientist
Authors:
Jacob Levman
Abstract:
When a scientist performs an experiment they normally acquire a set of measurements and are expected to demonstrate that their results are "statistically significant" thus confirming whatever hypothesis they are testing. The main method for establishing statistical significance involves demonstrating that there is a low probability that the observed experimental results were the product of random…
▽ More
When a scientist performs an experiment they normally acquire a set of measurements and are expected to demonstrate that their results are "statistically significant" thus confirming whatever hypothesis they are testing. The main method for establishing statistical significance involves demonstrating that there is a low probability that the observed experimental results were the product of random chance. This is typically defined as p < 0.05, which indicates there is less than a 5% chance that the observed results occurred randomly. This research study visually demonstrates that the commonly used definition for "statistical significance" can erroneously imply a significant finding. This is demonstrated by generating random Gaussian noise data and analyzing that data using statistical testing based on the established two-sample t-test. This study demonstrates that insignificant yet "statistically significant" findings are possible at moderately large sample sizes which are very common in many fields of modern science.
△ Less
Submitted 29 September, 2011;
originally announced September 2011.
