Estimating causal effects of time-dependent exposures on a binary endpoint in a high-dimensional setting
Authors:
Vahé Asvatourian,
Clélia Coutzac,
Nathalie Chaput,
Caroline Robert,
Stefan Michiels,
Emilie Lanoy
Abstract:
Recently, the intervention calculus when the DAG is absent (IDA) method was developed to estimate lower bounds of causal effects from observational high-dimensional data. Originally it was introduced to assess the effect of baseline biomarkers which do not vary over time. However, in many clinical settings, measurements of biomarkers are repeated at fixed time points during treatment exposure and,…
▽ More
Recently, the intervention calculus when the DAG is absent (IDA) method was developed to estimate lower bounds of causal effects from observational high-dimensional data. Originally it was introduced to assess the effect of baseline biomarkers which do not vary over time. However, in many clinical settings, measurements of biomarkers are repeated at fixed time points during treatment exposure and, therefore, this method need to be extended. The purpose of this paper is then to extend the first step of the IDA, the Peter Clarks (PC)-algorithm, to a time-dependent exposure in the context of a binary outcome. We generalised the PC-algorithm for taking into account the chronological order of repeated measurements of the exposure and propose to apply the IDA with our new version, the chronologically ordered PC-algorithm (COPC-algorithm). A simulation study has been performed before applying the method for estimating causal effects of time-dependent immunological biomarkers on toxicity, death and progression in patients with metastatic melanoma. The simulation study showed that the completed partially directed acyclic graphs (CPDAGs) obtained using COPC-algorithm were structurally closer to the true CPDAG than CPDAGs obtained using PC-algorithm. Also, causal effects were more accurate when they were estimated based on CPDAGs obtained using COPC-algorithm. Moreover, CPDAGs obtained by COPC-algorithm allowed removing non-chronologic arrows with a variable measured at a time t pointing to a variable measured at a time t' where t'< t. Bidirected edges were less present in CPDAGs obtained with the COPC-algorithm, supporting the fact that there was less variability in causal effects estimated from these CPDAGs. The COPC-algorithm provided CPDAGs that keep the chronological structure present in the data, thus allowed to estimate lower bounds of the causal effect of time-dependent biomarkers.
△ Less
Submitted 29 March, 2018; v1 submitted 28 March, 2018;
originally announced March 2018.
Causal inference to detect selection bias in road safety epidemiology
Authors:
Marine Dufournet,
Emilie Lanoy,
Jean-Louis Martin,
Vivian Viallon
Abstract:
In the field of road safety, it is common to use responsibility analyses to assess the effect of a given factor on the risk of being responsible for an accident, among drivers involved in an accident only. Even if this design is now widely adopted in the field, the question of selection bias is often raised. The structural Causal Model framework now provides valuable tools to assess causal effects…
▽ More
In the field of road safety, it is common to use responsibility analyses to assess the effect of a given factor on the risk of being responsible for an accident, among drivers involved in an accident only. Even if this design is now widely adopted in the field, the question of selection bias is often raised. The structural Causal Model framework now provides valuable tools to assess causal effects from observational data and identify selection bias. In this article, we briefly review recent results regarding the recoverability of causal effects from selection biased data, and apply them to the case of responsibility analyses. Our objective is to formally determine whether causal effects can be unbiasedly estimated through this type of analyses, when available data are restricted to severe accidents, as it is commonly the case in practice. However, because speed has a direct effect on the severity of the accident, we show that causal odds-ratios are not estimable from responsibility analyses. We present numerical results to illustrate our argument, the magnitude of the bias and to discuss recent results from real data.
△ Less
Submitted 14 October, 2018; v1 submitted 13 July, 2016;
originally announced July 2016.
