Showing 1–2 of 2 results for author: Lamas, A C

Adjusting for Misclassification: A Three-Phase Sampling Approach

Authors: Hailin Sang, Kenneth K. Lopiano, Denise A. Abreu, Andrea C. Lamas, Pam Arroway, Linda J. Young

Abstract: The United States Department of Agriculture's National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS) conducts the June Agricultural Survey (JAS) annually. Substantial misclassification occurs during the pre-screening process and from field-estimating farm status for non-response and inaccessible records, resulting in a biased estimate of the number of US farms from the JAS. Here the Annual Land Utilizati… ▽ More The United States Department of Agriculture's National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS) conducts the June Agricultural Survey (JAS) annually. Substantial misclassification occurs during the pre-screening process and from field-estimating farm status for non-response and inaccessible records, resulting in a biased estimate of the number of US farms from the JAS. Here the Annual Land Utilization Survey (ALUS) is proposed as a follow-on survey to the JAS to adjust the estimates of the number of US farms and other important variables. A three-phase survey design-based estimator is developed for the JAS-ALUS with non-response adjustment for the second phase (ALUS). A design-unbiased estimator of the variance is provided in explicit form. △ Less

Submitted 14 October, 2016; v1 submitted 14 June, 2013; originally announced June 2013.

Comments: 30 pages, to appear at Journal of Official Statistics

MSC Class: 62D05

Construction and evaluation of classifiers for forensic document analysis

Authors: Christopher P. Saunders, Linda J. Davis, Andrea C. Lamas, John J. Miller, Donald T. Gantz

Abstract: In this study we illustrate a statistical approach to questioned document examination. Specifically, we consider the construction of three classifiers that predict the writer of a sample document based on categorical data. To evaluate these classifiers, we use a data set with a large number of writers and a small number of writing samples per writer. Since the resulting classifiers were found to h… ▽ More In this study we illustrate a statistical approach to questioned document examination. Specifically, we consider the construction of three classifiers that predict the writer of a sample document based on categorical data. To evaluate these classifiers, we use a data set with a large number of writers and a small number of writing samples per writer. Since the resulting classifiers were found to have near perfect accuracy using leave-one-out cross-validation, we propose a novel Bayesian-based cross-validation method for evaluating the classifiers. △ Less

Submitted 28 June, 2011; v1 submitted 5 April, 2010; originally announced April 2010.

Comments: Published in at http://dx.doi.org/10.1214/10-AOAS379 the Annals of Applied Statistics (http://www.imstat.org/aoas/) by the Institute of Mathematical Statistics (http://www.imstat.org)

Report number: IMS-AOAS-AOAS379

Journal ref: Annals of Applied Statistics 2011, Vol. 5, No. 1, 381-399