-
Diffusion Counterfactual Generation with Semantic Abduction
Authors:
Rajat Rasal,
Avinash Kori,
Fabio De Sousa Ribeiro,
Tian Xia,
Ben Glocker
Abstract:
Counterfactual image generation presents significant challenges, including preserving identity, maintaining perceptual quality, and ensuring faithfulness to an underlying causal model. While existing auto-encoding frameworks admit semantic latent spaces which can be manipulated for causal control, they struggle with scalability and fidelity. Advancements in diffusion models present opportunities f…
▽ More
Counterfactual image generation presents significant challenges, including preserving identity, maintaining perceptual quality, and ensuring faithfulness to an underlying causal model. While existing auto-encoding frameworks admit semantic latent spaces which can be manipulated for causal control, they struggle with scalability and fidelity. Advancements in diffusion models present opportunities for improving counterfactual image editing, having demonstrated state-of-the-art visual quality, human-aligned perception and representation learning capabilities. Here, we present a suite of diffusion-based causal mechanisms, introducing the notions of spatial, semantic and dynamic abduction. We propose a general framework that integrates semantic representations into diffusion models through the lens of Pearlian causality to edit images via a counterfactual reasoning process. To our knowledge, this is the first work to consider high-level semantic identity preservation for diffusion counterfactuals and to demonstrate how semantic control enables principled trade-offs between faithful causal control and identity preservation.
△ Less
Submitted 9 June, 2025;
originally announced June 2025.
-
Continuous Bayesian Model Selection for Multivariate Causal Discovery
Authors:
Anish Dhir,
Ruby Sedgwick,
Avinash Kori,
Ben Glocker,
Mark van der Wilk
Abstract:
Current causal discovery approaches require restrictive model assumptions in the absence of interventional data to ensure structure identifiability. These assumptions often do not hold in real-world applications leading to a loss of guarantees and poor performance in practice. Recent work has shown that, in the bivariate case, Bayesian model selection can greatly improve performance by exchanging…
▽ More
Current causal discovery approaches require restrictive model assumptions in the absence of interventional data to ensure structure identifiability. These assumptions often do not hold in real-world applications leading to a loss of guarantees and poor performance in practice. Recent work has shown that, in the bivariate case, Bayesian model selection can greatly improve performance by exchanging restrictive modelling for more flexible assumptions, at the cost of a small probability of making an error. Our work shows that this approach is useful in the important multivariate case as well. We propose a scalable algorithm leveraging a continuous relaxation of the discrete model selection problem. Specifically, we employ the Causal Gaussian Process Conditional Density Estimator (CGP-CDE) as a Bayesian non-parametric model, using its hyperparameters to construct an adjacency matrix. This matrix is then optimised using the marginal likelihood and an acyclicity regulariser, giving the maximum a posteriori causal graph. We demonstrate the competitiveness of our approach, showing it is advantageous to perform multivariate causal discovery without infeasible assumptions using Bayesian model selection.
△ Less
Submitted 24 June, 2025; v1 submitted 15 November, 2024;
originally announced November 2024.
-
Abstracting Deep Neural Networks into Concept Graphs for Concept Level Interpretability
Authors:
Avinash Kori,
Parth Natekar,
Ganapathy Krishnamurthi,
Balaji Srinivasan
Abstract:
The black-box nature of deep learning models prevents them from being completely trusted in domains like biomedicine. Most explainability techniques do not capture the concept-based reasoning that human beings follow. In this work, we attempt to understand the behavior of trained models that perform image processing tasks in the medical domain by building a graphical representation of the concepts…
▽ More
The black-box nature of deep learning models prevents them from being completely trusted in domains like biomedicine. Most explainability techniques do not capture the concept-based reasoning that human beings follow. In this work, we attempt to understand the behavior of trained models that perform image processing tasks in the medical domain by building a graphical representation of the concepts they learn. Extracting such a graphical representation of the model's behavior on an abstract, higher conceptual level would unravel the learnings of these models and would help us to evaluate the steps taken by the model for predictions. We show the application of our proposed implementation on two biomedical problems - brain tumor segmentation and fundus image classification. We provide an alternative graphical representation of the model by formulating a concept level graph as discussed above, which makes the problem of intervention to find active inference trails more tractable. Understanding these trails would provide an understanding of the hierarchy of the decision-making process followed by the model. [As well as overall nature of model]. Our framework is available at https://github.com/koriavinash1/BioExp
△ Less
Submitted 17 November, 2020; v1 submitted 14 August, 2020;
originally announced August 2020.
-
Dynamic Regularizer with an Informative Prior
Authors:
Avinash Kori,
Manik Sharma
Abstract:
Regularization methods, specifically those which directly alter weights like $L_1$ and $L_2$, are an integral part of many learning algorithms. Both the regularizers mentioned above are formulated by assuming certain priors in the parameter space and these assumptions, in some cases, induce sparsity in the parameter space. Regularizers help in transferring beliefs one has on the dataset or the par…
▽ More
Regularization methods, specifically those which directly alter weights like $L_1$ and $L_2$, are an integral part of many learning algorithms. Both the regularizers mentioned above are formulated by assuming certain priors in the parameter space and these assumptions, in some cases, induce sparsity in the parameter space. Regularizers help in transferring beliefs one has on the dataset or the parameter space by introducing adequate terms in the loss function. Any kind of formulation represents a specific set of beliefs: $L_1$ regularization conveys that the parameter space should be sparse whereas $L_2$ regularization conveys that the parameter space should be bounded and continuous. These regularizers in turn leverage certain priors to express these inherent beliefs. A better understanding of how the prior affects the behavior of the parameters and how the priors can be updated based on the dataset can contribute greatly in improving the generalization capabilities of a function estimator. In this work, we introduce a weakly informative prior and then further extend it to an informative prior in order to formulate a regularization penalty, which shows better results in terms of inducing sparsity experimentally, when compared to regularizers based only on Gaussian and Laplacian priors. Experimentally, we verify that a regularizer based on an adapted prior improves the generalization capabilities of any network. We illustrate the performance of the proposed method on the MNIST and CIFAR-10 datasets.
△ Less
Submitted 30 October, 2019;
originally announced October 2019.
-
Demystifying Brain Tumour Segmentation Networks: Interpretability and Uncertainty Analysis
Authors:
Parth Natekar,
Avinash Kori,
Ganapathy Krishnamurthi
Abstract:
The accurate automatic segmentation of gliomas and its intra-tumoral structures is important not only for treatment planning but also for follow-up evaluations. Several methods based on 2D and 3D Deep Neural Networks (DNN) have been developed to segment brain tumors and to classify different categories of tumors from different MRI modalities. However, these networks are often black-box models and…
▽ More
The accurate automatic segmentation of gliomas and its intra-tumoral structures is important not only for treatment planning but also for follow-up evaluations. Several methods based on 2D and 3D Deep Neural Networks (DNN) have been developed to segment brain tumors and to classify different categories of tumors from different MRI modalities. However, these networks are often black-box models and do not provide any evidence regarding the process they take to perform this task. Increasing transparency and interpretability of such deep learning techniques are necessary for the complete integration of such methods into medical practice. In this paper, we explore various techniques to explain the functional organization of brain tumor segmentation models and to extract visualizations of internal concepts to understand how these networks achieve highly accurate tumor segmentations. We use the BraTS 2018 dataset to train three different networks with standard architectures and outline similarities and differences in the process that these networks take to segment brain tumors. We show that brain tumor segmentation networks learn certain human-understandable disentangled concepts on a filter level. We also show that they take a top-down or hierarchical approach to localizing the different parts of the tumor. We then extract visualizations of some internal feature maps and also provide a measure of uncertainty with regards to the outputs of the models to give additional qualitative evidence about the predictions of these networks. We believe that the emergence of such human-understandable organization and concepts might aid in the acceptance and integration of such methods in medical diagnosis.
△ Less
Submitted 24 January, 2020; v1 submitted 3 September, 2019;
originally announced September 2019.
-
Identifying the Best Machine Learning Algorithms for Brain Tumor Segmentation, Progression Assessment, and Overall Survival Prediction in the BRATS Challenge
Authors:
Spyridon Bakas,
Mauricio Reyes,
Andras Jakab,
Stefan Bauer,
Markus Rempfler,
Alessandro Crimi,
Russell Takeshi Shinohara,
Christoph Berger,
Sung Min Ha,
Martin Rozycki,
Marcel Prastawa,
Esther Alberts,
Jana Lipkova,
John Freymann,
Justin Kirby,
Michel Bilello,
Hassan Fathallah-Shaykh,
Roland Wiest,
Jan Kirschke,
Benedikt Wiestler,
Rivka Colen,
Aikaterini Kotrotsou,
Pamela Lamontagne,
Daniel Marcus,
Mikhail Milchenko
, et al. (402 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Gliomas are the most common primary brain malignancies, with different degrees of aggressiveness, variable prognosis and various heterogeneous histologic sub-regions, i.e., peritumoral edematous/invaded tissue, necrotic core, active and non-enhancing core. This intrinsic heterogeneity is also portrayed in their radio-phenotype, as their sub-regions are depicted by varying intensity profiles dissem…
▽ More
Gliomas are the most common primary brain malignancies, with different degrees of aggressiveness, variable prognosis and various heterogeneous histologic sub-regions, i.e., peritumoral edematous/invaded tissue, necrotic core, active and non-enhancing core. This intrinsic heterogeneity is also portrayed in their radio-phenotype, as their sub-regions are depicted by varying intensity profiles disseminated across multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) scans, reflecting varying biological properties. Their heterogeneous shape, extent, and location are some of the factors that make these tumors difficult to resect, and in some cases inoperable. The amount of resected tumor is a factor also considered in longitudinal scans, when evaluating the apparent tumor for potential diagnosis of progression. Furthermore, there is mounting evidence that accurate segmentation of the various tumor sub-regions can offer the basis for quantitative image analysis towards prediction of patient overall survival. This study assesses the state-of-the-art machine learning (ML) methods used for brain tumor image analysis in mpMRI scans, during the last seven instances of the International Brain Tumor Segmentation (BraTS) challenge, i.e., 2012-2018. Specifically, we focus on i) evaluating segmentations of the various glioma sub-regions in pre-operative mpMRI scans, ii) assessing potential tumor progression by virtue of longitudinal growth of tumor sub-regions, beyond use of the RECIST/RANO criteria, and iii) predicting the overall survival from pre-operative mpMRI scans of patients that underwent gross total resection. Finally, we investigate the challenge of identifying the best ML algorithms for each of these tasks, considering that apart from being diverse on each instance of the challenge, the multi-institutional mpMRI BraTS dataset has also been a continuously evolving/growing dataset.
△ Less
Submitted 23 April, 2019; v1 submitted 5 November, 2018;
originally announced November 2018.
