-
Neural Population Decoding and Imbalanced Multi-Omic Datasets For Cancer Subtype Diagnosis
Authors:
Charles Theodore Kent,
Leila Bagheriye,
Johan Kwisthout
Abstract:
Recent strides in the field of neural computation has seen the adoption of Winner Take All (WTA) circuits to facilitate the unification of hierarchical Bayesian inference and spiking neural networks as a neurobiologically plausible model of information processing. Current research commonly validates the performance of these networks via classification tasks, particularly of the MNIST dataset. Howe…
▽ More
Recent strides in the field of neural computation has seen the adoption of Winner Take All (WTA) circuits to facilitate the unification of hierarchical Bayesian inference and spiking neural networks as a neurobiologically plausible model of information processing. Current research commonly validates the performance of these networks via classification tasks, particularly of the MNIST dataset. However, researchers have not yet reached consensus about how best to translate the stochastic responses from these networks into discrete decisions, a process known as population decoding. Despite being an often underexamined part of SNNs, in this work we show that population decoding has a significanct impact on the classification performance of WTA networks. For this purpose, we apply a WTA network to the problem of cancer subtype diagnosis from multi omic data, using datasets from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). In doing so we utilise a novel implementation of gene similarity networks, a feature encoding technique based on Kohoens self organising map algorithm. We further show that the impact of selecting certain population decoding methods is amplified when facing imbalanced datasets.
△ Less
Submitted 6 January, 2024;
originally announced January 2024.
-
The ASNR-MICCAI Brain Tumor Segmentation (BraTS) Challenge 2023: Intracranial Meningioma
Authors:
Dominic LaBella,
Maruf Adewole,
Michelle Alonso-Basanta,
Talissa Altes,
Syed Muhammad Anwar,
Ujjwal Baid,
Timothy Bergquist,
Radhika Bhalerao,
Sully Chen,
Verena Chung,
Gian-Marco Conte,
Farouk Dako,
James Eddy,
Ivan Ezhov,
Devon Godfrey,
Fathi Hilal,
Ariana Familiar,
Keyvan Farahani,
Juan Eugenio Iglesias,
Zhifan Jiang,
Elaine Johanson,
Anahita Fathi Kazerooni,
Collin Kent,
John Kirkpatrick,
Florian Kofler
, et al. (35 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Meningiomas are the most common primary intracranial tumor in adults and can be associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Radiologists, neurosurgeons, neuro-oncologists, and radiation oncologists rely on multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) for diagnosis, treatment planning, and longitudinal treatment monitoring; yet automated, objective, and quantitative tools for non-invasive assessment of men…
▽ More
Meningiomas are the most common primary intracranial tumor in adults and can be associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Radiologists, neurosurgeons, neuro-oncologists, and radiation oncologists rely on multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) for diagnosis, treatment planning, and longitudinal treatment monitoring; yet automated, objective, and quantitative tools for non-invasive assessment of meningiomas on mpMRI are lacking. The BraTS meningioma 2023 challenge will provide a community standard and benchmark for state-of-the-art automated intracranial meningioma segmentation models based on the largest expert annotated multilabel meningioma mpMRI dataset to date. Challenge competitors will develop automated segmentation models to predict three distinct meningioma sub-regions on MRI including enhancing tumor, non-enhancing tumor core, and surrounding nonenhancing T2/FLAIR hyperintensity. Models will be evaluated on separate validation and held-out test datasets using standardized metrics utilized across the BraTS 2023 series of challenges including the Dice similarity coefficient and Hausdorff distance. The models developed during the course of this challenge will aid in incorporation of automated meningioma MRI segmentation into clinical practice, which will ultimately improve care of patients with meningioma.
△ Less
Submitted 12 May, 2023;
originally announced May 2023.
-
Frank-Wolfe Methods in Probability Space
Authors:
Carson Kent,
Jose Blanchet,
Peter Glynn
Abstract:
We introduce a new class of Frank-Wolfe algorithms for minimizing differentiable functionals over probability measures. This framework can be shown to encompass a diverse range of tasks in areas such as artificial intelligence, reinforcement learning, and optimization. Concrete computational complexities for these algorithms are established and demonstrate that these methods enjoy convergence in r…
▽ More
We introduce a new class of Frank-Wolfe algorithms for minimizing differentiable functionals over probability measures. This framework can be shown to encompass a diverse range of tasks in areas such as artificial intelligence, reinforcement learning, and optimization. Concrete computational complexities for these algorithms are established and demonstrate that these methods enjoy convergence in regimes that go beyond convexity and require minimal regularity of the underlying functional. Novel techniques used to obtain these results also lead to the development of new complexity bounds and duality theorems for a family of distributionally robust optimization problems. The performance of our method is demonstrated on several nonparametric estimation problems.
△ Less
Submitted 11 May, 2021;
originally announced May 2021.
-
Accelerating MCMC with active subspaces
Authors:
Paul G. Constantine,
Carson Kent,
Tan Bui-Thanh
Abstract:
The Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) method is the computational workhorse for Bayesian inverse problems. However, MCMC struggles in high-dimensional parameter spaces, since its iterates must sequentially explore the high-dimensional space. This struggle is compounded in physical applications when the nonlinear forward model is computationally expensive. One approach to accelerate MCMC is to reduce…
▽ More
The Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) method is the computational workhorse for Bayesian inverse problems. However, MCMC struggles in high-dimensional parameter spaces, since its iterates must sequentially explore the high-dimensional space. This struggle is compounded in physical applications when the nonlinear forward model is computationally expensive. One approach to accelerate MCMC is to reduce the dimension of the state space. Active subspaces are part of an emerging set of tools for subspace-based dimension reduction. An active subspace in a given inverse problem indicates a separation between a low-dimensional subspace that is informed by the data and its orthogonal complement that is constrained by the prior. With this information, one can run the sequential MCMC on the active variables while sampling independently according to the prior on the inactive variables. However, this approach to increase efficiency may introduce bias. We provide a bound on the Hellinger distance between the true posterior and its active subspace- exploiting approximation. And we demonstrate the active subspace-accelerated MCMC on two computational examples: (i) a two-dimensional parameter space with a quadratic forward model and one-dimensional active subspace and (ii) a 100-dimensional parameter space with a PDE-based forward model and a two-dimensional active subspace.
△ Less
Submitted 2 July, 2016; v1 submitted 30 September, 2015;
originally announced October 2015.