Multiple imputation with missing data indicators
Authors:
Lauren J Beesley,
Irina Bondarenko,
Michael R Elliott,
Allison W Kurian,
Steven J Katz,
Jeremy M G Taylor
Abstract:
Multiple imputation is a well-established general technique for analyzing data with missing values. A convenient way to implement multiple imputation is sequential regression multiple imputation (SRMI), also called chained equations multiple imputation. In this approach, we impute missing values using regression models for each variable, conditional on the other variables in the data. This approac…
▽ More
Multiple imputation is a well-established general technique for analyzing data with missing values. A convenient way to implement multiple imputation is sequential regression multiple imputation (SRMI), also called chained equations multiple imputation. In this approach, we impute missing values using regression models for each variable, conditional on the other variables in the data. This approach, however, assumes that the missingness mechanism is missing at random, and it is not well-justified under not-at-random missingness without additional modification. In this paper, we describe how we can generalize the SRMI imputation procedure to handle not-at-random missingness (MNAR) in the setting where missingness may depend on other variables that are also missing. We provide algebraic justification for several generalizations of standard SRMI using Taylor series and other approximations of the target imputation distribution under MNAR. Resulting regression model approximations include indicators for missingness, interactions, or other functions of the MNAR missingness model and observed data. In a simulation study, we demonstrate that the proposed SRMI modifications result in reduced bias in the final analysis compared to standard SRMI, with an approximation strategy involving inclusion of an offset in the imputation model performing the best overall. The method is illustrated in a breast cancer study, where the goal is to estimate the prevalence of a specific genetic pathogenic variant.
△ Less
Submitted 2 March, 2021;
originally announced March 2021.
A hierarchical model for estimating exposure-response curves from multiple studies
Authors:
Joshua P. Keller,
Joanne Katz,
Amid K. Pokhrel,
Michael N. Bates,
James Tielsch,
Scott L. Zeger
Abstract:
Cookstove replacement trials have found mixed results on their impact on respiratory health. The limited range of concentrations and small sample sizes of individual studies are important factors that may be limiting their statistical power. We present a hierarchical approach to modeling exposure concentrations and pooling data from multiple studies in order to estimate a common exposure-response…
▽ More
Cookstove replacement trials have found mixed results on their impact on respiratory health. The limited range of concentrations and small sample sizes of individual studies are important factors that may be limiting their statistical power. We present a hierarchical approach to modeling exposure concentrations and pooling data from multiple studies in order to estimate a common exposure-response curve. The exposure concentration model accommodates temporally sparse, clustered longitudinal observations. The exposure-response curve model provides a flexible, semi-parametric estimate of the exposure-response relationship while accommodating heterogeneous clustered data. We apply this model to data from three studies of cookstoves and respiratory infections in children in Nepal, which represent three study types: crossover trial, parallel trial, and case-control study. We find evidence of increased odds of disease for particulate matter concentrations between 50 and 200 $μ$g/m$^3$ and a flattening of the exposure-response curve for higher exposure concentrations. The model we present can incorporate additional studies and be applied to other settings.
△ Less
Submitted 14 August, 2019;
originally announced August 2019.
