-
Benchmarking Counterfactual Interpretability in Deep Learning Models for Time Series Classification
Authors:
Ziwen Kan,
Shahbaz Rezaei,
Xin Liu
Abstract:
The popularity of deep learning methods in the time series domain boosts interest in interpretability studies, including counterfactual (CF) methods. CF methods identify minimal changes in instances to alter the model predictions. Despite extensive research, no existing work benchmarks CF methods in the time series domain. Additionally, the results reported in the literature are inconclusive due t…
▽ More
The popularity of deep learning methods in the time series domain boosts interest in interpretability studies, including counterfactual (CF) methods. CF methods identify minimal changes in instances to alter the model predictions. Despite extensive research, no existing work benchmarks CF methods in the time series domain. Additionally, the results reported in the literature are inconclusive due to the limited number of datasets and inadequate metrics. In this work, we redesign quantitative metrics to accurately capture desirable characteristics in CFs. We specifically redesign the metrics for sparsity and plausibility and introduce a new metric for consistency. Combined with validity, generation time, and proximity, we form a comprehensive metric set. We systematically benchmark 6 different CF methods on 20 univariate datasets and 10 multivariate datasets with 3 different classifiers. Results indicate that the performance of CF methods varies across metrics and among different models. Finally, we provide case studies and a guideline for practical usage.
△ Less
Submitted 9 October, 2024; v1 submitted 22 August, 2024;
originally announced August 2024.
-
P-ADMMiRNN: Training RNN with Stable Convergence via An Efficient and Paralleled ADMM Approach
Authors:
Yu Tang,
Zhigang Kan,
Dequan Sun,
Jingjing Xiao,
Zhiquan Lai,
Linbo Qiao,
Dongsheng Li
Abstract:
It is hard to train Recurrent Neural Network (RNN) with stable convergence and avoid gradient vanishing and exploding problems, as the weights in the recurrent unit are repeated from iteration to iteration. Moreover, RNN is sensitive to the initialization of weights and bias, which brings difficulties in training. The Alternating Direction Method of Multipliers (ADMM) has become a promising algori…
▽ More
It is hard to train Recurrent Neural Network (RNN) with stable convergence and avoid gradient vanishing and exploding problems, as the weights in the recurrent unit are repeated from iteration to iteration. Moreover, RNN is sensitive to the initialization of weights and bias, which brings difficulties in training. The Alternating Direction Method of Multipliers (ADMM) has become a promising algorithm to train neural networks beyond traditional stochastic gradient algorithms with the gradient-free features and immunity to unsatisfactory conditions. However, ADMM could not be applied to train RNN directly since the state in the recurrent unit is repetitively updated over timesteps. Therefore, this work builds a new framework named ADMMiRNN upon the unfolded form of RNN to address the above challenges simultaneously. We also provide novel update rules and theoretical convergence analysis. We explicitly specify essential update rules in the iterations of ADMMiRNN with constructed approximation techniques and solutions to each sub-problem instead of vanilla ADMM. Numerical experiments are conducted on MNIST, IMDb, and text classification tasks. ADMMiRNN achieves convergent results and outperforms the compared baselines. Furthermore, ADMMiRNN trains RNN more stably without gradient vanishing or exploding than stochastic gradient algorithms. We also provide a distributed paralleled algorithm regarding ADMMiRNN, named P-ADMMiRNN, including Synchronous Parallel ADMMiRNN (SP-ADMMiRNN) and Asynchronous Parallel ADMMiRNN (AP-ADMMiRNN), which is the first to train RNN with ADMM in an asynchronous parallel manner. The source code is publicly available.
△ Less
Submitted 28 March, 2022; v1 submitted 9 June, 2020;
originally announced June 2020.
-
Supervised Learning in the Presence of Concept Drift: A modelling framework
Authors:
Michiel Straat,
Fthi Abadi,
Zhuoyun Kan,
Christina Göpfert,
Barbara Hammer,
Michael Biehl
Abstract:
We present a modelling framework for the investigation of supervised learning in non-stationary environments. Specifically, we model two example types of learning systems: prototype-based Learning Vector Quantization (LVQ) for classification and shallow, layered neural networks for regression tasks. We investigate so-called student teacher scenarios in which the systems are trained from a stream o…
▽ More
We present a modelling framework for the investigation of supervised learning in non-stationary environments. Specifically, we model two example types of learning systems: prototype-based Learning Vector Quantization (LVQ) for classification and shallow, layered neural networks for regression tasks. We investigate so-called student teacher scenarios in which the systems are trained from a stream of high-dimensional, labeled data. Properties of the target task are considered to be non-stationary due to drift processes while the training is performed. Different types of concept drift are studied, which affect the density of example inputs only, the target rule itself, or both. By applying methods from statistical physics, we develop a modelling framework for the mathematical analysis of the training dynamics in non-stationary environments.
Our results show that standard LVQ algorithms are already suitable for the training in non-stationary environments to a certain extent. However, the application of weight decay as an explicit mechanism of forgetting does not improve the performance under the considered drift processes. Furthermore, we investigate gradient-based training of layered neural networks with sigmoidal activation functions and compare with the use of rectified linear units (ReLU). Our findings show that the sensitivity to concept drift and the effectiveness of weight decay differs significantly between the two types of activation function.
△ Less
Submitted 27 February, 2021; v1 submitted 21 May, 2020;
originally announced May 2020.
