Showing 1–2 of 2 results for author: Johnston, L G
-
Reduced Bias for respondent driven sampling: accounting for non-uniform edge sampling probabilities in people who inject drugs in Mauritius
Authors:
Miles Q. Ott,
Krista J. Gile,
Matthew T. Harrison,
Lisa G. Johnston,
Joseph W. Hogan
Abstract:
People who inject drugs are an important population to study in order to reduce transmission of blood-borne illnesses including HIV and Hepatitis. In this paper we estimate the HIV and Hepatitis C prevalence among people who inject drugs, as well as the proportion of people who inject drugs who are female in Mauritius. Respondent driven sampling (RDS), a widely adopted link-tracing sampling design…
▽ More
People who inject drugs are an important population to study in order to reduce transmission of blood-borne illnesses including HIV and Hepatitis. In this paper we estimate the HIV and Hepatitis C prevalence among people who inject drugs, as well as the proportion of people who inject drugs who are female in Mauritius. Respondent driven sampling (RDS), a widely adopted link-tracing sampling design used to collect samples from hard-to-reach human populations, was used to collect this sample. The random walk approximation underlying many common RDS estimators assumes that each social relation (edge) in the underlying social network has an equal probability of being traced in the collection of the sample. This assumption does not hold in practice. We show that certain RDS estimators are sensitive to the violation of this assumption. In order to address this limitation in current methodology, and the impact it may have on prevalence estimates, we present a new method for improving RDS prevalence estimators using estimated edge inclusion probabilities, and apply this to data from Mauritius.
△ Less
Submitted 25 December, 2017;
originally announced December 2017.
-
Diagnostics for Respondent-driven Sampling
Authors:
Krista J. Gile,
Lisa G. Johnston,
Matthew J. Salganik
Abstract:
Respondent-driven sampling (RDS) is a widely used method for sampling from hard-to-reach human populations, especially groups most at-risk for HIV/AIDS. Data are collected through a peer-referral process in which current sample members harness existing social networks to recruit additional sample members. RDS has proven to be a practical method of data collection in many difficult settings and has…
▽ More
Respondent-driven sampling (RDS) is a widely used method for sampling from hard-to-reach human populations, especially groups most at-risk for HIV/AIDS. Data are collected through a peer-referral process in which current sample members harness existing social networks to recruit additional sample members. RDS has proven to be a practical method of data collection in many difficult settings and has been adopted by leading public health organizations around the world. Unfortunately, inference from RDS data requires many strong assumptions because the sampling design is not fully known and is partially beyond the control of the researcher. In this paper, we introduce diagnostic tools for most of the assumptions underlying RDS inference. We also apply these diagnostics in a case study of 12 populations at increased risk for HIV/AIDS. We developed these diagnostics to enable RDS researchers to better understand their data and to encourage future statistical research on RDS.
△ Less
Submitted 27 September, 2012;
originally announced September 2012.
