Showing 1–3 of 3 results for author: Hudson, C M

Explicating feature contribution using Random Forest proximity distances

Authors: Leanne S. Whitmore, Anthe George, Corey M. Hudson

Abstract: In Random Forests, proximity distances are a metric representation of data into decision space. By observing how changes in input map to the movement of instances in this space we are able to determine the independent contribution of each feature to the decision-making process. For binary feature vectors, this process is fully specified. As these changes in input move particular instances nearer t… ▽ More In Random Forests, proximity distances are a metric representation of data into decision space. By observing how changes in input map to the movement of instances in this space we are able to determine the independent contribution of each feature to the decision-making process. For binary feature vectors, this process is fully specified. As these changes in input move particular instances nearer to the in-group or out-group, the independent contribution of each feature can be uncovered. Using this technique, we are able to calculate the contribution of each feature in determining how black-box decisions were made. This allows explication of the decision-making process, audit of the classifier, and post-hoc analysis of errors in classification. △ Less

Submitted 17 July, 2018; originally announced July 2018.

Comments: Presented at IJCAI/ECAI 2018 Workshop on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)

Probability Series Expansion Classifier that is Interpretable by Design

Authors: Sapan Agarwal, Corey M. Hudson

Abstract: This work presents a new classifier that is specifically designed to be fully interpretable. This technique determines the probability of a class outcome, based directly on probability assignments measured from the training data. The accuracy of the predicted probability can be improved by measuring more probability estimates from the training data to create a series expansion that refines the pre… ▽ More This work presents a new classifier that is specifically designed to be fully interpretable. This technique determines the probability of a class outcome, based directly on probability assignments measured from the training data. The accuracy of the predicted probability can be improved by measuring more probability estimates from the training data to create a series expansion that refines the predicted probability. We use this work to classify four standard datasets and achieve accuracies comparable to that of Random Forests. Because this technique is interpretable by design, it is capable of determining the combinations of features that contribute to a particular classification probability for individual cases as well as the weightings of each of combination of features. △ Less

Submitted 27 October, 2017; originally announced October 2017.

Comments: Presented at NIPS 2017 Symposium on Interpretable Machine Learning

Mapping chemical performance on molecular structures using locally interpretable explanations

Authors: Leanne S. Whitmore, Anthe George, Corey M. Hudson

Abstract: In this work, we present an application of Locally Interpretable Machine-Agnostic Explanations to 2-D chemical structures. Using this framework we are able to provide a structural interpretation for an existing black-box model for classifying biologically produced fuel compounds with regard to Research Octane Number. This method of "painting" locally interpretable explanations onto 2-D chemical st… ▽ More In this work, we present an application of Locally Interpretable Machine-Agnostic Explanations to 2-D chemical structures. Using this framework we are able to provide a structural interpretation for an existing black-box model for classifying biologically produced fuel compounds with regard to Research Octane Number. This method of "painting" locally interpretable explanations onto 2-D chemical structures replicates the chemical intuition of synthetic chemists, allowing researchers in the field to directly accept, reject, inform and evaluate decisions underlying inscrutably complex quantitative structure-activity relationship models. △ Less

Submitted 22 November, 2016; originally announced November 2016.

Comments: Presented at NIPS 2016 Workshop on Interpretable Machine Learning in Complex Systems