Showing 1–2 of 2 results for author: Guedj, J
-
Modeling the dynamics of biomarkers during primary HIV infection taking into account the uncertainty of infection date
Authors:
J. Drylewicz,
J. Guedj,
D. Commenges,
R. Thiébaut
Abstract:
During primary HIV infection, the kinetics of plasma virus concentrations and CD4+ cell counts is very complex. Parametric and nonparametric models have been suggested for fitting repeated measurements of these markers. Alternatively, mechanistic approaches based on ordinary differential equations have also been proposed. These latter models are constructed according to biological knowledge and ta…
▽ More
During primary HIV infection, the kinetics of plasma virus concentrations and CD4+ cell counts is very complex. Parametric and nonparametric models have been suggested for fitting repeated measurements of these markers. Alternatively, mechanistic approaches based on ordinary differential equations have also been proposed. These latter models are constructed according to biological knowledge and take into account the complex nonlinear interactions between viruses and cells. However, estimating the parameters of these models is difficult. A main difficulty in the context of primary HIV infection is that the date of infection is generally unknown. For some patients, the date of last negative HIV test is available in addition to the date of first positive HIV test (seroconverters). In this paper we propose a likelihood-based method for estimating the parameters of dynamical models using a population approach and taking into account the uncertainty of the infection date. We applied this method to a sample of 761 HIV-infected patients from the Concerted Action on SeroConversion to AIDS and Death in Europe (CASCADE).
△ Less
Submitted 6 January, 2011;
originally announced January 2011.
-
Estimating a difference between Kullback-Leibler risks by a normalized difference of AIC
Authors:
D. Commenges,
A. Sayyareh,
L. Letenneur,
J. Guedj,
A. Bar-Hen
Abstract:
AIC is commonly used for model selection but the precise value of AIC has no direct interpretation. We are interested in quantifying a difference of risks between two models. This may be useful for both an explanatory point of view or for prediction, where a simpler model may be preferred if it does nearly as well as a more complex model. The difference of risks can be interpreted by linking the…
▽ More
AIC is commonly used for model selection but the precise value of AIC has no direct interpretation. We are interested in quantifying a difference of risks between two models. This may be useful for both an explanatory point of view or for prediction, where a simpler model may be preferred if it does nearly as well as a more complex model. The difference of risks can be interpreted by linking the risks with relative errors in the computation of probabilities and looking at the values obtained for simple models. A scale of values going from negligible to large is proposed. We propose a normalization of a difference of Akaike criteria for estimating the difference of expected Kullback-Leibler risks between maximum likelihood estimators of the distribution in two different models. The variability of this statistic can be estimated. Thus, an interval can be constructed which contains the true difference of expected Kullback-Leibler risks with a pre-specified probability. A simulation study shows that the method works and it is illustrated on two examples. The first is a study of the relationship between body-mass index and depression in elderly people. The second is the choice between models of HIV dynamics, where one model makes the distinction between activated CD4+ T lymphocytes and the other does not.
△ Less
Submitted 25 July, 2008;
originally announced July 2008.
