Showing 1–3 of 3 results for author: Graves, T L

A Note on Using Discretized Simulated Data to Estimate Implicit Likelihoods in Bayesian Analyses

Authors: M. S. Hamada, T. L. Graves, N. W. Hengartner, D. M. Higdon, A. V. Huzurbazar, E. C. Lawrence, C. D. Linkletter, C. S. Reese, D. W. Scott, R. R. Sitter, R. L. Warr, B. J. Williams

Abstract: This article presents a Bayesian inferential method where the likelihood for a model is unknown but where data can easily be simulated from the model. We discretize simulated (continuous) data to estimate the implicit likelihood in a Bayesian analysis employing a Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithm. Three examples are presented as well as a small study on some of the method's properties. This article presents a Bayesian inferential method where the likelihood for a model is unknown but where data can easily be simulated from the model. We discretize simulated (continuous) data to estimate the implicit likelihood in a Bayesian analysis employing a Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithm. Three examples are presented as well as a small study on some of the method's properties. △ Less

Submitted 6 August, 2020; originally announced August 2020.

Automatic Step Size Selection in Random Walk Metropolis Algorithms

Authors: Todd L. Graves

Abstract: Practitioners of Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) may hesitate to use random walk Metropolis-Hastings algorithms, especially variable-at-a-time algorithms with many parameters, because these algorithms require users to select values of tuning parameters (step sizes). These algorithms perform poorly if the step sizes are set to be too low or too high. We show in this paper that it is not difficult f… ▽ More Practitioners of Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) may hesitate to use random walk Metropolis-Hastings algorithms, especially variable-at-a-time algorithms with many parameters, because these algorithms require users to select values of tuning parameters (step sizes). These algorithms perform poorly if the step sizes are set to be too low or too high. We show in this paper that it is not difficult for an algorithm to tune these step sizes automatically to obtain a desired acceptance probability, since the logit of the acceptance probability is very nearly linear in the log of the step size, with known slope coefficient. These ideas work in most applications, including single parameter or block moves on the linear, log, or logit scales. We discuss the implementation of this algorithm in the software package YADAS. △ Less

Submitted 30 March, 2011; originally announced March 2011.

Comments: 13 pages, 2 figures

Report number: LA-UR 11-01936 MSC Class: 62

Advances in Data Combination, Analysis and Collection for System Reliability Assessment

Authors: Alyson G. Wilson, Todd L. Graves, Michael S. Hamada, C. Shane Reese

Abstract: The systems that statisticians are asked to assess, such as nuclear weapons, infrastructure networks, supercomputer codes and munitions, have become increasingly complex. It is often costly to conduct full system tests. As such, we present a review of methodology that has been proposed for addressing system reliability with limited full system testing. The first approaches presented in this pape… ▽ More The systems that statisticians are asked to assess, such as nuclear weapons, infrastructure networks, supercomputer codes and munitions, have become increasingly complex. It is often costly to conduct full system tests. As such, we present a review of methodology that has been proposed for addressing system reliability with limited full system testing. The first approaches presented in this paper are concerned with the combination of multiple sources of information to assess the reliability of a single component. The second general set of methodology addresses the combination of multiple levels of data to determine system reliability. We then present developments for complex systems beyond traditional series/parallel representations through the use of Bayesian networks and flowgraph models. We also include methodological contributions to resource allocation considerations for system relability assessment. We illustrate each method with applications primarily encountered at Los Alamos National Laboratory. △ Less

Submitted 2 August, 2007; originally announced August 2007.

Comments: Published at http://dx.doi.org/10.1214/088342306000000439 in the Statistical Science (http://www.imstat.org/sts/) by the Institute of Mathematical Statistics (http://www.imstat.org)

Report number: IMS-STS-STS208

Journal ref: Statistical Science 2006, Vol. 21, No. 4, 514-531