Investigating the Pilot Point Ensemble Kalman Filter for geostatistical inversion and data assimilation
Authors:
Johannes Keller,
Harrie-Jan Hendricks Franssen,
Wolfgang Nowak
Abstract:
Parameter estimation has a high importance in the geosciences. The ensemble Kalman filter (EnKF) allows parameter estimation for large, time-dependent systems. For large systems, the EnKF is applied using small ensembles, which may lead to spurious correlations and, ultimately, to filter divergence. We present a thorough evaluation of the pilot point ensemble Kalman filter (PP-EnKF), a variant of…
▽ More
Parameter estimation has a high importance in the geosciences. The ensemble Kalman filter (EnKF) allows parameter estimation for large, time-dependent systems. For large systems, the EnKF is applied using small ensembles, which may lead to spurious correlations and, ultimately, to filter divergence. We present a thorough evaluation of the pilot point ensemble Kalman filter (PP-EnKF), a variant of the ensemble Kalman filter for parameter estimation. In this evaluation, we explicitly state the update equations of the PP-EnKF, discuss the differences of this update equation compared to the update equations of similar EnKF methods, and perform an extensive performance comparison. The performance of the PP-EnKF is tested and compared to the performance of seven other EnKF methods in two model setups, a tracer setup and a well setup. In both setups, the PP-EnKF performs well, ranking better than the classical EnKF. For the tracer setup, the PP-EnKF ranks third out of eight methods. At the same time, the PP-EnKF yields estimates of the ensemble variance that are close to EnKF results from a very large-ensemble reference, suggesting that it is not affected by underestimation of the ensemble variance. In a comparison of the ensemble variances, the PP-EnKF ranks first and third out of eight methods. Additionally, for the well model and ensemble size 50, the PP-EnKF yields correlation structures significantly closer to a reference than the classical EnKF, an indication of the method's skill to suppress spurious correlations for small ensemble sizes.
△ Less
Submitted 4 August, 2021;
originally announced August 2021.
Comparing seven variants of the Ensemble Kalman Filter: How many synthetic experiments are needed?
Authors:
Johannes Keller,
Harrie-Jan Hendricks Franssen,
Gabriele Marquart
Abstract:
The Ensemble Kalman Filter (EnKF) is a popular estimation technique in the geosciences. It is used as a numerical tool for state vector prognosis and parameter estimation. The EnKF can, for example, help to evaluate the geothermal potential of an aquifer. In such applications, the EnKF is often used with small or medium ensemble sizes. It is therefore of interest to characterize the EnKF behavior…
▽ More
The Ensemble Kalman Filter (EnKF) is a popular estimation technique in the geosciences. It is used as a numerical tool for state vector prognosis and parameter estimation. The EnKF can, for example, help to evaluate the geothermal potential of an aquifer. In such applications, the EnKF is often used with small or medium ensemble sizes. It is therefore of interest to characterize the EnKF behavior for these ensemble sizes. For seven ensemble sizes (50, 70, 100, 250, 500, 1000, 2000) and seven EnKF-variants (Damped, Iterative, Local, Hybrid, Dual, Normal Score and Classical EnKF), we computed 1000 synthetic parameter estimation experiments for two set-ups: a 2D tracer transport problem and a 2D flow problem with one injection well. For each model, the only difference among synthetic experiments was the generated set of random permeability fields. The 1000 synthetic experiments allow to calculate the pdf of the RMSE of the characterization of the permeability field. Comparing mean RMSEs for different EnKF-variants, ensemble sizes and flow/transport set-ups suggests that multiple synthetic experiments are needed for a solid performance comparison. In this work, 10 synthetic experiments were needed to correctly distinguish RMSE differences between EnKF-variants smaller than 10%. For detecting RMSE differences smaller than 2%, 100 synthetic experiments were needed for ensemble sizes 50, 70, 100 and 250. The overall ranking of the EnKF-variants is strongly dependent on the physical model set-up and the ensemble size.
△ Less
Submitted 23 August, 2018;
originally announced August 2018.
