Telematics Combined Actuarial Neural Networks for Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Claim Count Data
Authors:
Francis Duval,
Jean-Philippe Boucher,
Mathieu Pigeon
Abstract:
We present novel cross-sectional and longitudinal claim count models for vehicle insurance built upon the Combined Actuarial Neural Network (CANN) framework proposed by Mario Wüthrich and Michael Merz. The CANN approach combines a classical actuarial model, such as a generalized linear model, with a neural network. This blending of models results in a two-component model comprising a classical reg…
▽ More
We present novel cross-sectional and longitudinal claim count models for vehicle insurance built upon the Combined Actuarial Neural Network (CANN) framework proposed by Mario Wüthrich and Michael Merz. The CANN approach combines a classical actuarial model, such as a generalized linear model, with a neural network. This blending of models results in a two-component model comprising a classical regression model and a neural network part. The CANN model leverages the strengths of both components, providing a solid foundation and interpretability from the classical model while harnessing the flexibility and capacity to capture intricate relationships and interactions offered by the neural network. In our proposed models, we use well-known log-linear claim count regression models for the classical regression part and a multilayer perceptron (MLP) for the neural network part. The MLP part is used to process telematics car driving data given as a vector characterizing the driving behavior of each insured driver. In addition to the Poisson and negative binomial distributions for cross-sectional data, we propose a procedure for training our CANN model with a multivariate negative binomial (MVNB) specification. By doing so, we introduce a longitudinal model that accounts for the dependence between contracts from the same insured. Our results reveal that the CANN models exhibit superior performance compared to log-linear models that rely on manually engineered telematics features.
△ Less
Submitted 3 December, 2023; v1 submitted 3 August, 2023;
originally announced August 2023.
How much telematics information do insurers need for claim classification?
Authors:
Francis Duval,
Jean-Philippe Boucher,
Mathieu Pigeon
Abstract:
It has been shown several times in the literature that telematics data collected in motor insurance help to better understand an insured's driving risk. Insurers that use this data reap several benefits, such as a better estimate of the pure premium, more segmented pricing and less adverse selection. The flip side of the coin is that collected telematics information is often sensitive and can ther…
▽ More
It has been shown several times in the literature that telematics data collected in motor insurance help to better understand an insured's driving risk. Insurers that use this data reap several benefits, such as a better estimate of the pure premium, more segmented pricing and less adverse selection. The flip side of the coin is that collected telematics information is often sensitive and can therefore compromise policyholders' privacy. Moreover, due to their large volume, this type of data is costly to store and hard to manipulate. These factors, combined with the fact that insurance regulators tend to issue more and more recommendations regarding the collection and use of telematics data, make it important for an insurer to determine the right amount of telematics information to collect. In addition to traditional contract information such as the age and gender of the insured, we have access to a telematics dataset where information is summarized by trip. We first derive several features of interest from these trip summaries before building a claim classification model using both traditional and telematics features. By comparing a few classification algorithms, we find that logistic regression with lasso penalty is the most suitable for our problem. Using this model, we develop a method to determine how much information about policyholders' driving should be kept by an insurer. Using real data from a North American insurance company, we find that telematics data become redundant after about 3 months or 4,000 kilometers of observation, at least from a claim classification perspective.
△ Less
Submitted 25 October, 2021; v1 submitted 28 May, 2021;
originally announced May 2021.
