-
A primer on inference and prediction with epidemic renewal models and sequential Monte Carlo
Authors:
Nicholas Steyn,
Kris V. Parag,
Robin N. Thompson,
Christl A. Donnelly
Abstract:
Renewal models are widely used in statistical epidemiology as semi-mechanistic models of disease transmission. While primarily used for estimating the instantaneous reproduction number, they can also be used for generating projections, estimating elimination probabilities, modelling the effect of interventions, and more. We demonstrate how simple sequential Monte Carlo methods (also known as parti…
▽ More
Renewal models are widely used in statistical epidemiology as semi-mechanistic models of disease transmission. While primarily used for estimating the instantaneous reproduction number, they can also be used for generating projections, estimating elimination probabilities, modelling the effect of interventions, and more. We demonstrate how simple sequential Monte Carlo methods (also known as particle filters) can be used to perform inference on these models. Our goal is to acquaint a reader who has a working knowledge of statistical inference with these methods and models and to provide a practical guide to their implementation. We focus on these methods' flexibility and their ability to handle multiple statistical and other biases simultaneously. We leverage this flexibility to unify existing methods for estimating the instantaneous reproduction number and generating projections. A companion website SMC and epidemic renewal models provides additional worked examples, self-contained code to reproduce the examples presented here, and additional materials.
△ Less
Submitted 10 June, 2025; v1 submitted 24 March, 2025;
originally announced March 2025.
-
Intrinsic Randomness in Epidemic Modelling Beyond Statistical Uncertainty
Authors:
Matthew J. Penn,
Daniel J. Laydon,
Joseph Penn,
Charles Whittaker,
Christian Morgenstern,
Oliver Ratmann,
Swapnil Mishra,
Mikko S. Pakkanen,
Christl A. Donnelly,
Samir Bhatt
Abstract:
Uncertainty can be classified as either aleatoric (intrinsic randomness) or epistemic (imperfect knowledge of parameters). The majority of frameworks assessing infectious disease risk consider only epistemic uncertainty. We only ever observe a single epidemic, and therefore cannot empirically determine aleatoric uncertainty. Here, we characterise both epistemic and aleatoric uncertainty using a ti…
▽ More
Uncertainty can be classified as either aleatoric (intrinsic randomness) or epistemic (imperfect knowledge of parameters). The majority of frameworks assessing infectious disease risk consider only epistemic uncertainty. We only ever observe a single epidemic, and therefore cannot empirically determine aleatoric uncertainty. Here, we characterise both epistemic and aleatoric uncertainty using a time-varying general branching process. Our framework explicitly decomposes aleatoric variance into mechanistic components, quantifying the contribution to uncertainty produced by each factor in the epidemic process, and how these contributions vary over time. The aleatoric variance of an outbreak is itself a renewal equation where past variance affects future variance. We find that, superspreading is not necessary for substantial uncertainty, and profound variation in outbreak size can occur even without overdispersion in the offspring distribution (i.e. the distribution of the number of secondary infections an infected person produces). Aleatoric forecasting uncertainty grows dynamically and rapidly, and so forecasting using only epistemic uncertainty is a significant underestimate. Therefore, failure to account for aleatoric uncertainty will ensure that policymakers are misled about the substantially higher true extent of potential risk. We demonstrate our method, and the extent to which potential risk is underestimated, using two historical examples.
△ Less
Submitted 8 June, 2023; v1 submitted 25 October, 2022;
originally announced October 2022.
-
COVID-19-Associated Orphanhood and Caregiver Death in the United States
Authors:
Susan D. Hillis,
Alexandra Blenkinsop,
Andrés Villaveces,
Francis B. Annor,
Leandris Liburd,
Greta M. Massetti,
Zewditu Demissie,
James A. Mercy,
Charles A. Nelson III,
Lucie Cluver,
Seth Flaxman,
Lorraine Sherr,
Christl A. Donnelly,
Oliver Ratmann,
H. Juliette T. Unwin
Abstract:
Background: Most COVID-19 deaths occur among adults, not children, and attention has focused on mitigating COVID-19 burden among adults. However, a tragic consequence of adult deaths is that high numbers of children might lose their parents and caregivers to COVID-19-associated deaths.
Methods: We quantified COVID-19-associated caregiver loss and orphanhood in the US and for each state using fer…
▽ More
Background: Most COVID-19 deaths occur among adults, not children, and attention has focused on mitigating COVID-19 burden among adults. However, a tragic consequence of adult deaths is that high numbers of children might lose their parents and caregivers to COVID-19-associated deaths.
Methods: We quantified COVID-19-associated caregiver loss and orphanhood in the US and for each state using fertility and excess and COVID-19 mortality data. We assessed burden and rates of COVID-19-associated orphanhood and deaths of custodial and co-residing grandparents, overall and by race/ethnicity. We further examined variations in COVID-19-associated orphanhood by race/ethnicity for each state.
Results: We found that from April 1, 2020 through June 30, 2021, over 140,000 children in the US experienced the death of a parent or grandparent caregiver. The risk of such loss was 1.1 to 4.5 times higher among children of racial and ethnic minorities, compared to Non-Hispanic White children. The highest burden of COVID-19-associated death of parents and caregivers occurred in Southern border states for Hispanic children, Southeastern states for Black children, and in states with tribal areas for American Indian/Alaska Native populations.
Conclusions: We found substantial disparities in distributions of COVID-19-associated death of parents and caregivers across racial and ethnic groups. Children losing caregivers to COVID-19 need care and safe, stable, and nurturing families with economic support, quality childcare and evidence-based parenting support programs. There is an urgent need to mount an evidence-based comprehensive response focused on those children at greatest risk, in the states most affected.
△ Less
Submitted 22 December, 2021;
originally announced December 2021.
-
Estimating the number of infections and the impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions on COVID-19 in European countries: technical description update
Authors:
Seth Flaxman,
Swapnil Mishra,
Axel Gandy,
H Juliette T Unwin,
Helen Coupland,
Thomas A Mellan,
Harrison Zhu,
Tresnia Berah,
Jeffrey W Eaton,
Pablo N P Guzman,
Nora Schmit,
Lucia Callizo,
Imperial College COVID-19 Response Team,
Charles Whittaker,
Peter Winskill,
Xiaoyue Xi,
Azra Ghani,
Christl A. Donnelly,
Steven Riley,
Lucy C Okell,
Michaela A C Vollmer,
Neil M. Ferguson,
Samir Bhatt
Abstract:
Following the emergence of a novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) and its spread outside of China, Europe has experienced large epidemics. In response, many European countries have implemented unprecedented non-pharmaceutical interventions including case isolation, the closure of schools and universities, banning of mass gatherings and/or public events, and most recently, wide-scale social distancing in…
▽ More
Following the emergence of a novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) and its spread outside of China, Europe has experienced large epidemics. In response, many European countries have implemented unprecedented non-pharmaceutical interventions including case isolation, the closure of schools and universities, banning of mass gatherings and/or public events, and most recently, wide-scale social distancing including local and national lockdowns.
In this technical update, we extend a semi-mechanistic Bayesian hierarchical model that infers the impact of these interventions and estimates the number of infections over time. Our methods assume that changes in the reproductive number - a measure of transmission - are an immediate response to these interventions being implemented rather than broader gradual changes in behaviour. Our model estimates these changes by calculating backwards from temporal data on observed to estimate the number of infections and rate of transmission that occurred several weeks prior, allowing for a probabilistic time lag between infection and death.
In this update we extend our original model [Flaxman, Mishra, Gandy et al 2020, Report #13, Imperial College London] to include (a) population saturation effects, (b) prior uncertainty on the infection fatality ratio, (c) a more balanced prior on intervention effects and (d) partial pooling of the lockdown intervention covariate. We also (e) included another 3 countries (Greece, the Netherlands and Portugal).
The model code is available at https://github.com/ImperialCollegeLondon/covid19model/
We are now reporting the results of our updated model online at https://mrc-ide.github.io/covid19estimates/
We estimated parameters jointly for all M=14 countries in a single hierarchical model. Inference is performed in the probabilistic programming language Stan using an adaptive Hamiltonian Monte Carlo (HMC) sampler.
△ Less
Submitted 23 April, 2020;
originally announced April 2020.
