-
Peer-to-Peer Basis Risk Management for Renewable Production Parametric Insurance
Authors:
Fallou Niakh,
Alicia Bassière,
Michel Denuit,
Christian Robert
Abstract:
The financial viability of renewable energy projects is challenged by the variability and unpredictability of production due to weather fluctuations. This paper proposes a novel risk management framework combining parametric insurance and peer-to-peer (P2P) risk sharing to address production uncertainty in solar electricity generation. We first design a weather-based parametric insurance scheme to…
▽ More
The financial viability of renewable energy projects is challenged by the variability and unpredictability of production due to weather fluctuations. This paper proposes a novel risk management framework combining parametric insurance and peer-to-peer (P2P) risk sharing to address production uncertainty in solar electricity generation. We first design a weather-based parametric insurance scheme to protect against forecast errors, recalibrated at the site level to mitigate geographical basis risk. To handle residual mismatches between insurance payouts and actual losses, we introduce a complementary P2P mechanism that redistributes the remaining basis risk among participants. The method leverages physically based simulation models to reconstruct day-ahead forecasts and realized productions, integrating climate data and solar farm characteristics. A second-order theoretical approximation links heterogeneous local models to a shared weather index, making risk sharing operationally feasible. In an empirical application to 50 German solar farms, our approach reduces the volatility of production losses by 55\%, demonstrating its potential to stabilize revenues and strengthen the resilience of renewable investments.
△ Less
Submitted 27 April, 2025; v1 submitted 13 April, 2025;
originally announced April 2025.
-
Autocalibration and Tweedie-dominance for Insurance Pricing with Machine Learning
Authors:
Michel Denuit,
Arthur Charpentier,
Julien Trufin
Abstract:
Boosting techniques and neural networks are particularly effective machine learning methods for insurance pricing. Often in practice, there are nevertheless endless debates about the choice of the right loss function to be used to train the machine learning model, as well as about the appropriate metric to assess the performances of competing models. Also, the sum of fitted values can depart from…
▽ More
Boosting techniques and neural networks are particularly effective machine learning methods for insurance pricing. Often in practice, there are nevertheless endless debates about the choice of the right loss function to be used to train the machine learning model, as well as about the appropriate metric to assess the performances of competing models. Also, the sum of fitted values can depart from the observed totals to a large extent and this often confuses actuarial analysts. The lack of balance inherent to training models by minimizing deviance outside the familiar GLM with canonical link setting has been empirically documented in Wüthrich (2019, 2020) who attributes it to the early stopping rule in gradient descent methods for model fitting. The present paper aims to further study this phenomenon when learning proceeds by minimizing Tweedie deviance. It is shown that minimizing deviance involves a trade-off between the integral of weighted differences of lower partial moments and the bias measured on a specific scale. Autocalibration is then proposed as a remedy. This new method to correct for bias adds an extra local GLM step to the analysis. Theoretically, it is shown that it implements the autocalibration concept in pure premium calculation and ensures that balance also holds on a local scale, not only at portfolio level as with existing bias-correction techniques. The convex order appears to be the natural tool to compare competing models, putting a new light on the diagnostic graphs and associated metrics proposed by Denuit et al. (2019).
△ Less
Submitted 9 July, 2021; v1 submitted 5 March, 2021;
originally announced March 2021.
-
Max-factor individual risk models with application to credit portfolios
Authors:
Michel Denuit,
Anna Kiriliouk,
Johan Segers
Abstract:
Individual risk models need to capture possible correlations as failing to do so typically results in an underestimation of extreme quantiles of the aggregate loss. Such dependence modelling is particularly important for managing credit risk, for instance, where joint defaults are a major cause of concern. Often, the dependence between the individual loss occurrence indicators is driven by a small…
▽ More
Individual risk models need to capture possible correlations as failing to do so typically results in an underestimation of extreme quantiles of the aggregate loss. Such dependence modelling is particularly important for managing credit risk, for instance, where joint defaults are a major cause of concern. Often, the dependence between the individual loss occurrence indicators is driven by a small number of unobservable factors. Conditional loss probabilities are then expressed as monotone functions of linear combinations of these hidden factors. However, combining the factors in a linear way allows for some compensation between them. Such diversification effects are not always desirable and this is why the present work proposes a new model replacing linear combinations with maxima. These max-factor models give more insight into which of the factors is dominant.
△ Less
Submitted 10 December, 2014;
originally announced December 2014.
