-
Bayesian Model Selection for a Class of Spatially-Explicit Capture Recapture Models
Authors:
Soumen Dey,
Mohan Delampady,
Arjun M. Gopalaswamy
Abstract:
A vast amount of ecological knowledge generated recently has hinged upon the ability of model selection methods to discriminate among various ecological hypotheses. The last decade has seen the rise of Bayesian hierarchical models in ecology. Consequently, popular tools, such as the AIC, become largely inapplicable and other tools are not universally applicable. We focus on a class of competing Ba…
▽ More
A vast amount of ecological knowledge generated recently has hinged upon the ability of model selection methods to discriminate among various ecological hypotheses. The last decade has seen the rise of Bayesian hierarchical models in ecology. Consequently, popular tools, such as the AIC, become largely inapplicable and other tools are not universally applicable. We focus on a class of competing Bayesian spatially explicit capture recapture (SECR) models and first apply some of the recommended Bayesian model selection tools: (1) Bayes Factor - using (a) Gelfand-Dey (b) harmonic mean methods, (2) DIC, (3) WAIC and (4) the posterior predictive loss function. In all, we evaluate 25 variants of model selection tools in our study. We evaluate these model selection tools from the standpoint of model selection and parameter estimation by contrasting the choice recommended by a tool with a `true' model. In all, we generate 120 simulated data sets using the true model and assess the frequency with which the true model is selected and how well the tool estimates N (population size). We find that when information content is low, no particular tool can be recommended to help realise, simultaneously, both the goals of model selection and parameter estimation. In such scenarios, we recommend that practitioners utilise our application of Bayes Factor for parameter estimation and recommend the posterior predictive loss approach for model selection when information content is low. When both the objectives are taken together, we recommend the use of our applications of Bayes Factor for Bayesian SECR models. Our study reveals that although new model selection tools are emerging (eg: WAIC) in the applied statistics literature, an uncritical absorption of these new tools (i.e. without assessing their efficacies for the problem at hand) into ecological practice may mislead inferences.
△ Less
Submitted 4 October, 2018;
originally announced October 2018.
-
A spatially explicit capture recapture model for partially identified individuals when trap detection rate is less than one
Authors:
Soumen Dey,
Mohan Delampady,
K. Ullas Karanth,
Arjun M. Gopalaswamy
Abstract:
Spatially explicit capture recapture (SECR) models have gained enormous popularity to solve abundance estimation problems in ecology. In this study, we develop a novel Bayesian SECR model that disentangles the process of animal movement through a detector from the process of recording data by a detector in the face of imperfect detection. We integrate this complexity into an advanced version of a…
▽ More
Spatially explicit capture recapture (SECR) models have gained enormous popularity to solve abundance estimation problems in ecology. In this study, we develop a novel Bayesian SECR model that disentangles the process of animal movement through a detector from the process of recording data by a detector in the face of imperfect detection. We integrate this complexity into an advanced version of a recent SECR model involving partially identified individuals (Royle, 2015). We assess the performance of our model over a range of realistic simulation scenarios and demonstrate that estimates of population size $N$ improve when we utilize the proposed model relative to the model that does not explicitly estimate trap detection probability (Royle, 2015). We confront and investigate the proposed model with a spatial capture-recapture data set from a camera trapping survey on tigers (\textit{Panthera tigris}) in Nagarahole, southern India. Trap detection probability is estimated at 0.489 and therefore justifies the necessity to utilize our model in field situations. We discuss possible extensions, future work and relevance of our model to other statistical applications beyond ecology.
△ Less
Submitted 28 December, 2017;
originally announced December 2017.
-
Examining posterior propriety in the Bayesian analysis of capture-recapture models
Authors:
Arjun M. Gopalaswamy,
Mohan Delampady
Abstract:
There lies a latent danger in utilizing some known mathematical results in ecology. Some results do not apply to the problem at hand. We identify one such trend. Based on a couple of theorems in mathematical statistics, Link (2013) cautions ecologists about the inappropriateness of using the discrete uniform prior in their analysis under certain conditions and instead recommends the routine use of…
▽ More
There lies a latent danger in utilizing some known mathematical results in ecology. Some results do not apply to the problem at hand. We identify one such trend. Based on a couple of theorems in mathematical statistics, Link (2013) cautions ecologists about the inappropriateness of using the discrete uniform prior in their analysis under certain conditions and instead recommends the routine use of the scale prior during analysis. This recommendation is been absorbed immediately and widely among ecologists. In this study, we consider the two fundamental capture-recapture models used widely in ecology, $M_0$ and $M_h$, and derive conditions for posterior propriety by examining the behavior of the right tail of the posterior distributions of animal population size $N$ in a Bayesian analysis. We demonstrate that both these likelihoods are far more efficient than the ones considered in Link (2013). We argue that no particularly prescriptive approach should be adopted by ecologists in regard to choosing priors of the fear of posterior impropriety. Instead, we recommend the efficient construction of likelihoods for the problem and data on hand, choosing priors based existing knowledge of a parameter of interest and encourage examining posterior propriety by asymptotic arguments as demonstrated in this study.
△ Less
Submitted 8 November, 2016;
originally announced November 2016.
-
Fuzzy sets in nonparametric Bayes regression
Authors:
Jean-François Angers,
Mohan Delampady
Abstract:
A simple Bayesian approach to nonparametric regression is described using fuzzy sets and membership functions. Membership functions are interpreted as likelihood functions for the unknown regression function, so that with the help of a reference prior they can be transformed to prior density functions. The unknown regression function is decomposed into wavelets and a hierarchical Bayesian approa…
▽ More
A simple Bayesian approach to nonparametric regression is described using fuzzy sets and membership functions. Membership functions are interpreted as likelihood functions for the unknown regression function, so that with the help of a reference prior they can be transformed to prior density functions. The unknown regression function is decomposed into wavelets and a hierarchical Bayesian approach is employed for making inferences on the resulting wavelet coefficients.
△ Less
Submitted 21 May, 2008;
originally announced May 2008.
