Skip to main content

Showing 1–5 of 5 results for author: Cozman, F G

Searching in archive stat. Search in all archives.
.
  1. arXiv:2003.02817  [pdf, other

    cs.CL cs.LG stat.ML

    An Empirical Accuracy Law for Sequential Machine Translation: the Case of Google Translate

    Authors: Lucas Nunes Sequeira, Bruno Moreschi, Fabio Gagliardi Cozman, Bernardo Fontes

    Abstract: In this research, we have established, through empirical testing, a law that relates the number of translating hops to translation accuracy in sequential machine translation in Google Translate. Both accuracy and size decrease with the number of hops; the former displays a decrease closely following a power law. Such a law allows one to predict the behavior of translation chains that may be built… ▽ More

    Submitted 8 April, 2020; v1 submitted 5 March, 2020; originally announced March 2020.

    Comments: 11 pages, 8 figures (mostly graphs), a few mathematical functions and samples of the experiments

  2. arXiv:1910.05591  [pdf, other

    cs.LG stat.ML

    Measuring Unfairness through Game-Theoretic Interpretability

    Authors: Juliana Cesaro, Fabio G. Cozman

    Abstract: One often finds in the literature connections between measures of fairness and measures of feature importance employed to interpret trained classifiers. However, there seems to be no study that compares fairness measures and feature importance measures. In this paper we propose ways to evaluate and compare such measures. We focus in particular on SHAP, a game-theoretic measure of feature importanc… ▽ More

    Submitted 12 October, 2019; originally announced October 2019.

  3. arXiv:1806.09504  [pdf, other

    cs.AI cs.LG stat.ML

    Interpreting Embedding Models of Knowledge Bases: A Pedagogical Approach

    Authors: Arthur Colombini Gusmão, Alvaro Henrique Chaim Correia, Glauber De Bona, Fabio Gagliardi Cozman

    Abstract: Knowledge bases are employed in a variety of applications from natural language processing to semantic web search; alas, in practice their usefulness is hurt by their incompleteness. Embedding models attain state-of-the-art accuracy in knowledge base completion, but their predictions are notoriously hard to interpret. In this paper, we adapt "pedagogical approaches" (from the literature on neural… ▽ More

    Submitted 20 June, 2018; originally announced June 2018.

    Comments: presented at 2018 ICML Workshop on Human Interpretability in Machine Learning (WHI 2018), Stockholm, Sweden

  4. arXiv:1212.2458  [pdf

    cs.AI stat.CO

    Inference in Polytrees with Sets of Probabilities

    Authors: Jose Carlos Ferreira da Rocha, Fabio Gagliardi Cozman, Cassio Polpo de Campos

    Abstract: Inferences in directed acyclic graphs associated with probability sets and probability intervals are NP-hard, even for polytrees. In this paper we focus on such inferences, and propose: 1) a substantial improvement on Tessems A / R algorithm FOR polytrees WITH probability intervals; 2) a new algorithm FOR direction - based local search(IN sets OF probability) that improves ON e… ▽ More

    Submitted 19 October, 2012; originally announced December 2012.

    Comments: Appears in Proceedings of the Nineteenth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI2003)

    Report number: UAI-P-2003-PG-217-224

  5. arXiv:1207.1367  [pdf

    cs.AI stat.ML

    Belief Updating and Learning in Semi-Qualitative Probabilistic Networks

    Authors: Cassio Polpo de Campos, Fabio Gagliardi Cozman

    Abstract: This paper explores semi-qualitative probabilistic networks (SQPNs) that combine numeric and qualitative information. We first show that exact inferences with SQPNs are NPPP-Complete. We then show that existing qualitative relations in SQPNs (plus probabilistic logic and imprecise assessments) can be dealt effectively through multilinear programming. We then discuss learning: we consider a maximum… ▽ More

    Submitted 4 July, 2012; originally announced July 2012.

    Comments: Appears in Proceedings of the Twenty-First Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI2005)

    Report number: UAI-P-2005-PG-153-160