CaliCo: a R package for Bayesian calibration
Authors:
Mathieu Carmassi,
Pierre Barbillon,
Matthieu Chiodetti,
Merlin Keller,
Eric Parent
Abstract:
In this article, we present a recently released R package for Bayesian calibration. Many industrial fields are facing unfeasible or costly field experiments. These experiments are replaced with numerical/computer experiments which are realized by running a numerical code. Bayesian calibration intends to estimate, through a posterior distribution, input parameters of the code in order to make the c…
▽ More
In this article, we present a recently released R package for Bayesian calibration. Many industrial fields are facing unfeasible or costly field experiments. These experiments are replaced with numerical/computer experiments which are realized by running a numerical code. Bayesian calibration intends to estimate, through a posterior distribution, input parameters of the code in order to make the code outputs close to the available experimental data. The code can be time consuming while the Bayesian calibration implies a lot of code calls which makes studies too burdensome. A discrepancy might also appear between the numerical code and the physical system when facing incompatibility between experimental data and numerical code outputs. The package CaliCo deals with these issues through four statistical models which deal with a time consuming code or not and with discrepancy or not. A guideline for users is provided in order to illustrate the main functions and their arguments. Eventually, a toy example is detailed using CaliCo. This example (based on a real physical system) is in five dimensions and uses simulated data.
△ Less
Submitted 29 August, 2018; v1 submitted 3 August, 2018;
originally announced August 2018.
Bayesian calibration of a numerical code for prediction
Authors:
Mathieu Carmassi,
Pierre Barbillon,
Merlin Keller,
Eric Parent,
Matthieu Chiodetti
Abstract:
Field experiments are often difficult and expensive to make. To bypass these issues, industrial companies have developed computational codes. These codes intend to be representative of the physical system, but come with a certain amount of problems. The code intends to be as close as possible to the physical system. It turns out that, despite continuous code development, the difference between the…
▽ More
Field experiments are often difficult and expensive to make. To bypass these issues, industrial companies have developed computational codes. These codes intend to be representative of the physical system, but come with a certain amount of problems. The code intends to be as close as possible to the physical system. It turns out that, despite continuous code development, the difference between the code outputs and experiments can remain significant. Two kinds of uncertainties are observed. The first one comes from the difference between the physical phenomenon and the values recorded experimentally. The second concerns the gap between the code and the physical system. To reduce this difference, often named model bias, discrepancy, or model error, computer codes are generally complexified in order to make them more realistic. These improvements lead to time consuming codes. Moreover, a code often depends on parameters to be set by the user to make the code as close as possible to field data. This estimation task is called calibration. This paper proposes a review of Bayesian calibration methods and is based on an application case which makes it possible to discuss the various methodological choices and to illustrate their divergences. This example is based on a code used to predict the power of a photovoltaic plant.
△ Less
Submitted 25 March, 2019; v1 submitted 5 January, 2018;
originally announced January 2018.
