Showing 1–14 of 14 results for author: Carlin, J B

A roadmap for systematic identification and analysis of multiple biases in causal inference

Authors: Rushani Wijesuriya, Rachael A. Hughes, John B. Carlin, Rachel L. Peters, Jennifer J. Koplin, Margarita Moreno-Betancur

Abstract: Observational studies examining causal effects rely on unverifiable causal assumptions, the violation of which can induce multiple biases. Quantitative bias analysis (QBA) methods examine the sensitivity of findings to such violations, generally by producing bias-adjusted estimates under alternative assumptions. Common strategies for QBA address either a single source of bias or multiple sources o… ▽ More Observational studies examining causal effects rely on unverifiable causal assumptions, the violation of which can induce multiple biases. Quantitative bias analysis (QBA) methods examine the sensitivity of findings to such violations, generally by producing bias-adjusted estimates under alternative assumptions. Common strategies for QBA address either a single source of bias or multiple sources one at a time, thus not informing the overall impact of the potential biases. We propose a systematic approach (roadmap) for identifying and analysing multiple biases together. Briefly, this consists of (i) articulating the assumptions underlying the primary analysis through specification and emulation of the "ideal trial" that defines the causal estimand of interest and depicting these assumptions using casual diagrams; (ii) depicting alternative assumptions under which biases arise using causal diagrams; (iii) obtaining a single estimate simultaneously adjusted for all biases under the alternative assumptions. We illustrate the roadmap in an investigation of the effect of breastfeeding on risk of childhood asthma. We further use simulations to evaluate a recent simultaneous adjustment approach and illustrate the need for simultaneous rather than one-at-a-time adjustment to examine the overall impact of biases. The proposed roadmap should facilitate the conduct of high-quality multiple bias analyses. △ Less

Submitted 11 April, 2025; originally announced April 2025.

Comments: 11 Pages, 4 Figures

Sensitivity analysis methods for outcome missingness using substantive-model-compatible multiple imputation and their application in causal inference

Authors: Jiaxin Zhang, S. Ghazaleh Dashti, John B. Carlin, Katherine J. Lee, Jonathan W. Bartlett, Margarita Moreno-Betancur

Abstract: When using multiple imputation (MI) for missing data, maintaining compatibility between the imputation model and substantive analysis is important for avoiding bias. For example, some causal inference methods incorporate an outcome model with exposure-confounder interactions that must be reflected in the imputation model. Two approaches for compatible imputation with multivariable missingness have… ▽ More When using multiple imputation (MI) for missing data, maintaining compatibility between the imputation model and substantive analysis is important for avoiding bias. For example, some causal inference methods incorporate an outcome model with exposure-confounder interactions that must be reflected in the imputation model. Two approaches for compatible imputation with multivariable missingness have been proposed: Substantive-Model-Compatible Fully Conditional Specification (SMCFCS) and a stacked-imputation-based approach (SMC-stack). If the imputation model is correctly specified, both approaches are guaranteed to be unbiased under the "missing at random" assumption. However, this assumption is violated when the outcome causes its own missingness, which is common in practice. In such settings, sensitivity analyses are needed to assess the impact of alternative assumptions on results. An appealing solution for sensitivity analysis is delta-adjustment using MI, specifically "not-at-random" (NAR)FCS. However, the issue of imputation model compatibility has not been considered in sensitivity analysis, with a naive implementation of NARFCS being susceptible to bias. To address this gap, we propose two approaches for compatible sensitivity analysis when the outcome causes its own missingness. The proposed approaches, NAR-SMCFCS and NAR-SMC-stack, extend SMCFCS and SMC-stack, respectively, with delta-adjustment for the outcome. We evaluate these approaches using a simulation study that is motivated by a case study, to which the methods were also applied. The simulation results confirmed that a naive implementation of NARFCS produced bias in effect estimates, while NAR-SMCFCS and NAR-SMC-stack were approximately unbiased. The proposed compatible approaches provide promising avenues for conducting sensitivity analysis to missingness assumptions in causal inference. △ Less

Submitted 20 November, 2024; originally announced November 2024.

Causal machine learning methods and use of sample splitting in settings with high-dimensional confounding

Authors: Susan Ellul, John B. Carlin, Stijn Vansteelandt, Margarita Moreno-Betancur

Abstract: Observational epidemiological studies commonly seek to estimate the causal effect of an exposure on an outcome. Adjustment for potential confounding bias in modern studies is challenging due to the presence of high-dimensional confounding, which occurs when there are many confounders relative to sample size or complex relationships between continuous confounders and exposure and outcome. Despite r… ▽ More Observational epidemiological studies commonly seek to estimate the causal effect of an exposure on an outcome. Adjustment for potential confounding bias in modern studies is challenging due to the presence of high-dimensional confounding, which occurs when there are many confounders relative to sample size or complex relationships between continuous confounders and exposure and outcome. Despite recent advances, limited evaluation, and guidance are available on the implementation of doubly robust methods, Augmented Inverse Probability Weighting (AIPW) and Targeted Maximum Likelihood Estimation (TMLE), with data-adaptive approaches and cross-fitting in realistic settings where high-dimensional confounding is present. Motivated by an early-life cohort study, we conducted an extensive simulation study to compare the relative performance of AIPW and TMLE using data-adaptive approaches in estimating the average causal effect (ACE). We evaluated the benefits of using cross-fitting with a varying number of folds, as well as the impact of using a reduced versus full (larger, more diverse) library in the Super Learner ensemble learning approach used for implementation. We found that AIPW and TMLE performed similarly in most cases for estimating the ACE, but TMLE was more stable. Cross-fitting improved the performance of both methods, but was more important for estimation of standard error and coverage than for point estimates, with the number of folds a less important consideration. Using a full Super Learner library was important to reduce bias and variance in complex scenarios typical of modern health research studies. △ Less

Submitted 13 November, 2024; v1 submitted 24 May, 2024; originally announced May 2024.

Ideal trials, target trials and actual randomized trials

Authors: Margarita Moreno-Betancur, Rushani Wijesuriya, John B. Carlin

Abstract: Causal inference is the goal of randomized controlled trials and many observational studies. The first step in a formal approach to causal inference is to define the estimand of interest, and in both types of study this can be intuitively defined as the effect in an ideal trial: a hypothetical perfect randomized experiment (with representative sample, perfect adherence, etc.). The target trial fra… ▽ More Causal inference is the goal of randomized controlled trials and many observational studies. The first step in a formal approach to causal inference is to define the estimand of interest, and in both types of study this can be intuitively defined as the effect in an ideal trial: a hypothetical perfect randomized experiment (with representative sample, perfect adherence, etc.). The target trial framework is an increasingly popular approach to causal inference in observational studies, but clarity is lacking in how a target trial should be specified and, crucially, how it relates to the ideal trial. In this paper, we consider these questions and use an example from respiratory epidemiology to highlight challenges with an approach that is commonly seen in applications: to specify a target trial in a way that is closely aligned to the observational study (e.g. uses the same eligibility criteria, outcome measure, etc.). The main issue is that such a target trial generally deviates from the ideal trial. Thus, even if the target trial can be emulated perfectly apart from randomization, biases beyond baseline confounding are likely to remain, relative to the estimand of interest. Without consideration of the ideal trial, these biases may go unnoticed, mirroring the often-overlooked biases of actual trials. Therefore, we suggest that, in both actual trials and observational studies, specifying the ideal trial and how the target or actual trial differs from it is necessary to systematically assess all potential sources of biases, and therefore appropriately design analyses and interpret findings. △ Less

Submitted 22 November, 2024; v1 submitted 16 May, 2024; originally announced May 2024.

Comments: Major revision

Multiple imputation for longitudinal data: A tutorial

Authors: Rushani Wijesuriya, Margarita Moreno-Betancur, John B Carlin, Ian R White, Matteo Quartagno, Katherine J Lee

Abstract: Longitudinal studies are frequently used in medical research and involve collecting repeated measures on individuals over time. Observations from the same individual are invariably correlated and thus an analytic approach that accounts for this clustering by individual is required. While almost all research suffers from missing data, this can be particularly problematic in longitudinal studies as… ▽ More Longitudinal studies are frequently used in medical research and involve collecting repeated measures on individuals over time. Observations from the same individual are invariably correlated and thus an analytic approach that accounts for this clustering by individual is required. While almost all research suffers from missing data, this can be particularly problematic in longitudinal studies as participation often becomes harder to maintain over time. Multiple imputation (MI) is widely used to handle missing data in such studies. When using MI, it is important that the imputation model is compatible with the proposed analysis model. In a longitudinal analysis, this implies that the clustering considered in the analysis model should be reflected in the imputation process. Several MI approaches have been proposed to impute incomplete longitudinal data, such as treating repeated measurements of the same variable as distinct variables or using generalized linear mixed imputation models. However, the uptake of these methods has been limited, as they require additional data manipulation and use of advanced imputation procedures. In this tutorial, we review the available MI approaches that can be used for handling incomplete longitudinal data, including where individuals are clustered within higher-level clusters. We illustrate implementation with replicable R and Stata code using a case study from the Childhood to Adolescence Transition Study. △ Less

Submitted 10 April, 2024; originally announced April 2024.

Comments: 35 pages, 3 figures

Handling multivariable missing data in causal mediation analysis estimating interventional effects

Authors: S. Ghazaleh Dashti, Katherine J. Lee, Julie A. Simpson, John B. Carlin, Margarita Moreno-Betancur

Abstract: The interventional effects approach to causal mediation analysis is increasingly common in epidemiologic research, given its potential to address policy-relevant questions about hypothetical mediator interventions. Multiple imputation (MI) is widely used for handling missing data in epidemiologic studies. However, guidance is lacking on best practices for using MI when estimating interventional me… ▽ More The interventional effects approach to causal mediation analysis is increasingly common in epidemiologic research, given its potential to address policy-relevant questions about hypothetical mediator interventions. Multiple imputation (MI) is widely used for handling missing data in epidemiologic studies. However, guidance is lacking on best practices for using MI when estimating interventional mediation effects, specifically regarding the role of the missingness mechanism in the method's performance, how to appropriately specify the MI model when g-computation is used for effect estimation, and suitable approaches to variance estimation. To address this gap, we conducted simulations based on the Victorian Adolescent Health Cohort Study. We considered seven missingness mechanisms involving varying assumptions about the influence of an intermediate confounder, a mediator, and/or the outcome on missingness in key variables. We compared the performance of complete-case analysis, six MI approaches using fully conditional specification (differing in how the imputation model was tailored), and a "substantive model compatible" multiple imputation-fully conditional specification approach. We evaluated MIBoot (MI, then bootstrap) and BootMI (bootstrap, then MI) approaches for variance estimation. All MI approaches, apart from those clearly diverging from best practice, yielded approximately unbiased estimates when none of the intermediate confounder, mediator, and outcome variables influenced missingness in any of these variables, and showed non-negligible bias otherwise. We observed the largest bias for interventional effects when each of the intermediate confounders, mediators, and outcomes influenced their own missingness. BootMI returned variance estimates with smaller bias than MIBoot. △ Less

Submitted 2 June, 2025; v1 submitted 26 March, 2024; originally announced March 2024.

Journal ref: Epidemiology 36(4):p 487-499, July 2025

On the uses and abuses of regression models: a call for reform of statistical practice and teaching

Authors: John B. Carlin, Margarita Moreno-Betancur

Abstract: Regression methods dominate the practice of biostatistical analysis, but biostatistical training emphasises the details of regression models and methods ahead of the purposes for which such modelling might be useful. More broadly, statistics is widely understood to provide a body of techniques for "modelling data", underpinned by what we describe as the "true model myth": that the task of the stat… ▽ More Regression methods dominate the practice of biostatistical analysis, but biostatistical training emphasises the details of regression models and methods ahead of the purposes for which such modelling might be useful. More broadly, statistics is widely understood to provide a body of techniques for "modelling data", underpinned by what we describe as the "true model myth": that the task of the statistician/data analyst is to build a model that closely approximates the true data generating process. By way of our own historical examples and a brief review of mainstream clinical research journals, we describe how this perspective has led to a range of problems in the application of regression methods, including misguided "adjustment" for covariates, misinterpretation of regression coefficients and the widespread fitting of regression models without a clear purpose. We then outline a new approach to the teaching and application of biostatistical methods, which situates them within a framework that first requires clear definition of the substantive research question at hand within one of three categories: descriptive, predictive, or causal. Within this approach, the development and application of (multivariable) regression models, as well as other advanced biostatistical methods, should proceed differently according to the type of question. Regression methods will no doubt remain central to statistical practice as they provide a powerful tool for representing variation in a response or outcome variable as a function of "input" variables, but their conceptualisation and usage should follow from the purpose at hand. △ Less

Submitted 11 September, 2024; v1 submitted 12 September, 2023; originally announced September 2023.

Comments: Updated version: 30 pages main document including 3 figures, plus 16 pages supplementary material. Resubmitted for publication, 3-Sep-24

Recoverability and estimation of causal effects under typical multivariable missingness mechanisms

Authors: Jiaxin Zhang, S. Ghazaleh Dashti, John B. Carlin, Katherine J. Lee, Margarita Moreno-Betancur

Abstract: In the context of missing data, the identifiability or "recoverability" of the average causal effect (ACE) depends on causal and missingness assumptions. The latter can be depicted by adding variable-specific missingness indicators to causal diagrams, creating "missingness-directed acyclic graphs" (m-DAGs). Previous research described ten canonical m-DAGs, representing typical multivariable missin… ▽ More In the context of missing data, the identifiability or "recoverability" of the average causal effect (ACE) depends on causal and missingness assumptions. The latter can be depicted by adding variable-specific missingness indicators to causal diagrams, creating "missingness-directed acyclic graphs" (m-DAGs). Previous research described ten canonical m-DAGs, representing typical multivariable missingness mechanisms in epidemiological studies, and determined the recoverability of the ACE in the absence of effect modification. We extend the research by determining the recoverability of the ACE in settings with effect modification and conducting a simulation study evaluating the performance of widely used missing data methods when estimating the ACE using correctly specified g-computation, which has not been previously studied. Methods assessed were complete case analysis (CCA) and various multiple imputation (MI) implementations regarding the degree of compatibility with the outcome model used in g-computation. Simulations were based on an example from the Victorian Adolescent Health Cohort Study (VAHCS), where interest was in estimating the ACE of adolescent cannabis use on mental health in young adulthood. In the canonical m-DAGs that excluded unmeasured common causes of missingness indicators, we derived the recoverable ACE if no incomplete variable causes its missingness, and non-recoverable otherwise. Besides, the simulation showed that compatible MI approaches may enable approximately unbiased ACE estimation, unless the outcome causes its missingness or it causes the missingness of a variable that causes its missingness. Researchers must consider sensitivity analysis methods incorporating external information in the latter setting. The VAHCS case study illustrates the practical implications of these findings. △ Less

Submitted 17 January, 2023; originally announced January 2023.

Comments: 27 pages; 11 figures; This work was presented at the 43rd Annual Conference of the International Society for Clinical Biostatistics, 2022, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK

Evaluation of multiple imputation to address intended and unintended missing data in case-cohort studies with a binary endpoint

Authors: Melissa Middleton, Cattram Nguyen, John B. Carlin, Margarita Moreno-Betancur, Katherine J. Lee

Abstract: Case-cohort studies are conducted within cohort studies, wherein collection of exposure data is limited to a subset of the cohort, leading to a large proportion of missing data by design. Standard analysis uses inverse probability weighting (IPW) to address this intended missing data, but little research has been conducted into how best to perform analysis when there is also unintended missingness… ▽ More Case-cohort studies are conducted within cohort studies, wherein collection of exposure data is limited to a subset of the cohort, leading to a large proportion of missing data by design. Standard analysis uses inverse probability weighting (IPW) to address this intended missing data, but little research has been conducted into how best to perform analysis when there is also unintended missingness. Multiple imputation (MI) has become a default standard for handling unintended missingness, but when used in combination with IPW, the imputation model needs to take account of the weighting to ensure compatibility with the analysis model. Alternatively, MI could be used to handle both the intended and unintended missingness. While the performance of a solely MI approach has been investigated in the context of a case-cohort study with a time-to-event outcome, it is unclear how this approach performs with binary outcomes. We conducted a simulation study to assess and compare the performance of approaches using only MI, only IPW, and a combination of MI and IPW, for handling intended and unintended missingness in this setting. We also applied the approaches to a case study. Our results show that the combined approach is approximately unbiased for estimation of the exposure effect when the sample size is large, and was the least biased with small sample sizes, while MI-only or IPW-only exhibited larger biases in both sample size settings. These findings suggest that MI is the preferred approach to handle intended and unintended missing data in case-cohort studies with binary outcomes. △ Less

Submitted 20 October, 2022; originally announced October 2022.

A comparison of strategies for selecting auxiliary variables for multiple imputation

Authors: Rheanna M. Mainzer, Cattram D. Nguyen, John B. Carlin, Margarita Moreno-Betancur, Ian R. White, Katherine J. Lee

Abstract: Multiple imputation (MI) is a popular method for handling missing data. Auxiliary variables can be added to the imputation model(s) to improve MI estimates. However, the choice of which auxiliary variables to include in the imputation model is not always straightforward. Including too few may lead to important information being discarded, but including too many can cause problems with convergence… ▽ More Multiple imputation (MI) is a popular method for handling missing data. Auxiliary variables can be added to the imputation model(s) to improve MI estimates. However, the choice of which auxiliary variables to include in the imputation model is not always straightforward. Including too few may lead to important information being discarded, but including too many can cause problems with convergence of the estimation procedures for imputation models. Several data-driven auxiliary variable selection strategies have been proposed. This paper uses a simulation study and a case study to provide a comprehensive comparison of the performance of eight auxiliary variable selection strategies, with the aim of providing practical advice to users of MI. A complete case analysis and an MI analysis with all auxiliary variables included in the imputation model (the full model) were also performed for comparison. Our simulation study results suggest that the full model outperforms all auxiliary variable selection strategies, providing further support for adopting an inclusive auxiliary variable strategy where possible. Auxiliary variable selection using the Least Absolute Selection and Shrinkage Operator (LASSO) was the best performing auxiliary variable selection strategy overall and is a promising alternative when the full model fails. All MI analysis strategies that we were able to apply to the case study led to similar estimates. △ Less

Submitted 30 March, 2022; originally announced March 2022.

Comments: 30 pages, 3 figures, 1 table

Handling missing data when estimating causal effects with Targeted Maximum Likelihood Estimation

Authors: S. Ghazaleh Dashti, Katherine J. Lee, Julie A. Simpson, Ian R. White, John B. Carlin, Margarita Moreno-Betancur

Abstract: Targeted Maximum Likelihood Estimation (TMLE) is increasingly used for doubly robust causal inference, but how missing data should be handled when using TMLE with data-adaptive approaches is unclear. Based on the Victorian Adolescent Health Cohort Study, we conducted a simulation study to evaluate eight missing data methods in this context: complete-case analysis, extended TMLE incorporating outco… ▽ More Targeted Maximum Likelihood Estimation (TMLE) is increasingly used for doubly robust causal inference, but how missing data should be handled when using TMLE with data-adaptive approaches is unclear. Based on the Victorian Adolescent Health Cohort Study, we conducted a simulation study to evaluate eight missing data methods in this context: complete-case analysis, extended TMLE incorporating outcome-missingness model, missing covariate missing indicator method, five multiple imputation (MI) approaches using parametric or machine-learning models. Six scenarios were considered, varying in exposure/outcome generation models (presence of confounder-confounder interactions) and missingness mechanisms (whether outcome influenced missingness in other variables and presence of interaction/non-linear terms in missingness models). Complete-case analysis and extended TMLE had small biases when outcome did not influence missingness in other variables. Parametric MI without interactions had large bias when exposure/outcome generation models included interactions. Parametric MI including interactions performed best in bias and variance reduction across all settings, except when missingness models included a non-linear term. When choosing a method to handle missing data in the context of TMLE, researchers must consider the missingness mechanism and, for MI, compatibility with the analysis method. In many settings, a parametric MI approach that incorporates interactions and non-linearities is expected to perform well. △ Less

Submitted 3 May, 2024; v1 submitted 9 December, 2021; originally announced December 2021.

Comments: 31 pages, 2 tables, 5 figures, 9 supplementary tables

Journal ref: Am J Epidemiol. 2024 Feb 22:kwae012. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 38400653

Evaluation of approaches for accommodating interactions and non-linear terms in multiple imputation of incomplete three-level data

Authors: Rushani Wijesuriya, Margarita Moreno-Betancur, John B. Carlin, Anurika P. De Silva, Katherine J. Lee

Abstract: Three-level data structures arising from repeated measures on individuals clustered within larger units are common in health research studies. Missing data are prominent in such studies and are often handled via multiple imputation (MI). Although several MI approaches can be used to account for the three-level structure, including adaptations to single- and two-level approaches, when the substanti… ▽ More Three-level data structures arising from repeated measures on individuals clustered within larger units are common in health research studies. Missing data are prominent in such studies and are often handled via multiple imputation (MI). Although several MI approaches can be used to account for the three-level structure, including adaptations to single- and two-level approaches, when the substantive analysis model includes interactions or quadratic effects these too need to be accommodated in the imputation model. In such analyses, substantive model compatible (SMC) MI has shown great promise in the context of single-level data. While there have been recent developments in multilevel SMC MI, to date only one approach that explicitly handles incomplete three-level data is available. Alternatively, researchers can use pragmatic adaptations to single- and two-level MI approaches, or two-level SMC-MI approaches. We describe the available approaches and evaluate them via simulation in the context of a three three-level random effects analysis models involving an interaction between the incomplete time-varying exposure and time, an interaction between the time-varying exposure and an incomplete time-fixed confounder, or a quadratic effect of the exposure. Results showed that all approaches considered performed well in terms of bias and precision when the target analysis involved an interaction with time, but the three-level SMC MI approach performed best when the target analysis involved an interaction between the time-varying exposure and an incomplete time-fixed confounder, or a quadratic effect of the exposure. We illustrate the methods using data from the Childhood to Adolescence Transition Study. △ Less

Submitted 29 October, 2020; originally announced October 2020.

Comments: 34 pages, 5 tables and 9 figures (without additional files)

Mediation effects that emulate a target randomised trial: Simulation-based evaluation of ill-defined interventions on multiple mediators

Authors: Margarita Moreno-Betancur, Paul Moran, Denise Becker, George C Patton, John B Carlin

Abstract: Many epidemiological questions concern potential interventions to alter the pathways presumed to mediate an association. For example, we consider a study that investigates the benefit of interventions in young adulthood for ameliorating the poorer mid-life psychosocial outcomes of adolescent self-harmers relative to their healthy peers. Two methodological challenges arise. Firstly, mediation metho… ▽ More Many epidemiological questions concern potential interventions to alter the pathways presumed to mediate an association. For example, we consider a study that investigates the benefit of interventions in young adulthood for ameliorating the poorer mid-life psychosocial outcomes of adolescent self-harmers relative to their healthy peers. Two methodological challenges arise. Firstly, mediation methods have hitherto mostly focused on the elusive task of discovering pathways, rather than on the evaluation of mediator interventions. Secondly, the complexity of such questions is invariably such that there are no existing data on well-defined interventions (i.e. actual treatments, programs, etc.) capturing the populations, outcomes and time-spans of interest. Instead, researchers must rely on exposure (non-intervention) data to address these questions, such as self-reported substance use and employment. We address the resulting challenges by specifying a target trial addressing three policy-relevant questions, regarding the impacts of hypothetical (rather than actual) interventions that would shift the mediators' distributions (separately, jointly or sequentially) to user-specified distributions that can be emulated with the observed data. We then define novel interventional effects that map to this trial, emulating shifts by setting mediators to random draws from those distributions. We show that estimation using a g-computation method is possible under an expanded set of causal assumptions relative to inference with well-defined interventions. These expanded assumptions reflect the lower level of evidence that is inevitable with ill-defined interventions. Application to the self-harm example using data from the Victorian Adolescent Health Cohort Study illustrates the value of our proposal for informing the design and evaluation of actual interventions in the future. △ Less

Submitted 13 July, 2020; v1 submitted 15 July, 2019; originally announced July 2019.

Bayesian modelling of lung function data from multiple-breath washout tests

Authors: Robert K. Mahar, John B. Carlin, Sarath Ranganathan, Anne-Louise Ponsonby, Peter Vuillermin, Damjan Vukcevic

Abstract: Paediatric respiratory researchers have widely adopted the multiple-breath washout (MBW) test because it allows assessment of lung function in unsedated infants and is well suited to longitudinal studies of lung development and disease. However, a substantial proportion of MBW tests in infants fail current acceptability criteria. We hypothesised that a model-based approach to analysing the data, i… ▽ More Paediatric respiratory researchers have widely adopted the multiple-breath washout (MBW) test because it allows assessment of lung function in unsedated infants and is well suited to longitudinal studies of lung development and disease. However, a substantial proportion of MBW tests in infants fail current acceptability criteria. We hypothesised that a model-based approach to analysing the data, in place of traditional simple empirical summaries, would enable more efficient use of these tests. We therefore developed a novel statistical model for infant MBW data and applied it to 1,197 tests from 432 individuals from a large birth cohort study. We focus on Bayesian estimation of the lung clearance index (LCI), the most commonly used summary of lung function from MBW tests. Our results show that the model provides an excellent fit to the data and shed further light on statistical properties of the standard empirical approach. Furthermore, the modelling approach enables LCI to be estimated using tests with different degrees of completeness, something not possible with the standard approach. Our model therefore allows previously unused data to be used rather than discarded, as well as routine use of shorter tests without significant loss of precision. Beyond our specific application, our work illustrates a number of important aspects of Bayesian modelling in practice, such as the importance of hierarchical specifications to account for repeated measurements and the value of model checking via posterior predictive distributions. △ Less

Submitted 5 November, 2017; v1 submitted 27 December, 2016; originally announced December 2016.

Journal ref: Statistics in Medicine (2018) 37(12):2016-2033