Showing 1–16 of 16 results for author: Blaschko, M B

A Novel Characterization of the Population Area Under the Risk Coverage Curve (AURC) and Rates of Finite Sample Estimators

Authors: Han Zhou, Jordy Van Landeghem, Teodora Popordanoska, Matthew B. Blaschko

Abstract: The selective classifier (SC) has been proposed for rank based uncertainty thresholding, which could have applications in safety critical areas such as medical diagnostics, autonomous driving, and the justice system. The Area Under the Risk-Coverage Curve (AURC) has emerged as the foremost evaluation metric for assessing the performance of SC systems. In this work, we present a formal statistical… ▽ More The selective classifier (SC) has been proposed for rank based uncertainty thresholding, which could have applications in safety critical areas such as medical diagnostics, autonomous driving, and the justice system. The Area Under the Risk-Coverage Curve (AURC) has emerged as the foremost evaluation metric for assessing the performance of SC systems. In this work, we present a formal statistical formulation of population AURC, presenting an equivalent expression that can be interpreted as a reweighted risk function. Through Monte Carlo methods, we derive empirical AURC plug-in estimators for finite sample scenarios. The weight estimators associated with these plug-in estimators are shown to be consistent, with low bias and tightly bounded mean squared error (MSE). The plug-in estimators are proven to converge at a rate of $\mathcal{O}(\sqrt{\ln(n)/n})$ demonstrating statistical consistency. We empirically validate the effectiveness of our estimators through experiments across multiple datasets, model architectures, and confidence score functions (CSFs), demonstrating consistency and effectiveness in fine-tuning AURC performance. △ Less

Submitted 28 May, 2025; v1 submitted 20 October, 2024; originally announced October 2024.

Consistent and Asymptotically Unbiased Estimation of Proper Calibration Errors

Authors: Teodora Popordanoska, Sebastian G. Gruber, Aleksei Tiulpin, Florian Buettner, Matthew B. Blaschko

Abstract: Proper scoring rules evaluate the quality of probabilistic predictions, playing an essential role in the pursuit of accurate and well-calibrated models. Every proper score decomposes into two fundamental components -- proper calibration error and refinement -- utilizing a Bregman divergence. While uncertainty calibration has gained significant attention, current literature lacks a general estimato… ▽ More Proper scoring rules evaluate the quality of probabilistic predictions, playing an essential role in the pursuit of accurate and well-calibrated models. Every proper score decomposes into two fundamental components -- proper calibration error and refinement -- utilizing a Bregman divergence. While uncertainty calibration has gained significant attention, current literature lacks a general estimator for these quantities with known statistical properties. To address this gap, we propose a method that allows consistent, and asymptotically unbiased estimation of all proper calibration errors and refinement terms. In particular, we introduce Kullback--Leibler calibration error, induced by the commonly used cross-entropy loss. As part of our results, we prove the relation between refinement and f-divergences, which implies information monotonicity in neural networks, regardless of which proper scoring rule is optimized. Our experiments validate empirically the claimed properties of the proposed estimator and suggest that the selection of a post-hoc calibration method should be determined by the particular calibration error of interest. △ Less

Submitted 13 December, 2023; originally announced December 2023.

Comments: Preprint

Estimating calibration error under label shift without labels

Authors: Teodora Popordanoska, Gorjan Radevski, Tinne Tuytelaars, Matthew B. Blaschko

Abstract: In the face of dataset shift, model calibration plays a pivotal role in ensuring the reliability of machine learning systems. Calibration error (CE) is an indicator of the alignment between the predicted probabilities and the classifier accuracy. While prior works have delved into the implications of dataset shift on calibration, existing CE estimators assume access to labels from the target domai… ▽ More In the face of dataset shift, model calibration plays a pivotal role in ensuring the reliability of machine learning systems. Calibration error (CE) is an indicator of the alignment between the predicted probabilities and the classifier accuracy. While prior works have delved into the implications of dataset shift on calibration, existing CE estimators assume access to labels from the target domain, which are often unavailable in practice, i.e., when the model is deployed and used. This work addresses such challenging scenario, and proposes a novel CE estimator under label shift, which is characterized by changes in the marginal label distribution $p(Y)$, while keeping the conditional $p(X|Y)$ constant between the source and target distributions. Our contribution is an approach, which, by leveraging importance re-weighting of the labeled source distribution, provides consistent and asymptotically unbiased CE estimation with respect to the shifted target distribution. Empirical results across diverse real-world datasets, under various conditions and label-shift intensities, demonstrate the effectiveness and reliability of the proposed estimator. △ Less

Submitted 13 December, 2023; originally announced December 2023.

Comments: Preprint

A Corrected Expected Improvement Acquisition Function Under Noisy Observations

Authors: Han Zhou, Xingchen Ma, Matthew B Blaschko

Abstract: Sequential maximization of expected improvement (EI) is one of the most widely used policies in Bayesian optimization because of its simplicity and ability to handle noisy observations. In particular, the improvement function often uses the best posterior mean as the best incumbent in noisy settings. However, the uncertainty associated with the incumbent solution is often neglected in many analyti… ▽ More Sequential maximization of expected improvement (EI) is one of the most widely used policies in Bayesian optimization because of its simplicity and ability to handle noisy observations. In particular, the improvement function often uses the best posterior mean as the best incumbent in noisy settings. However, the uncertainty associated with the incumbent solution is often neglected in many analytic EI-type methods: a closed-form acquisition function is derived in the noise-free setting, but then applied to the setting with noisy observations. To address this limitation, we propose a modification of EI that corrects its closed-form expression by incorporating the covariance information provided by the Gaussian Process (GP) model. This acquisition function specializes to the classical noise-free result, and we argue should replace that formula in Bayesian optimization software packages, tutorials, and textbooks. This enhanced acquisition provides good generality for noisy and noiseless settings. We show that our method achieves a sublinear convergence rate on the cumulative regret bound under heteroscedastic observation noise. Our empirical results demonstrate that our proposed acquisition function can outperform EI in the presence of noisy observations on benchmark functions for black-box optimization, as well as on parameter search for neural network model compression. △ Less

Submitted 13 November, 2023; v1 submitted 8 October, 2023; originally announced October 2023.

A Consistent and Differentiable Lp Canonical Calibration Error Estimator

Authors: Teodora Popordanoska, Raphael Sayer, Matthew B. Blaschko

Abstract: Calibrated probabilistic classifiers are models whose predicted probabilities can directly be interpreted as uncertainty estimates. It has been shown recently that deep neural networks are poorly calibrated and tend to output overconfident predictions. As a remedy, we propose a low-bias, trainable calibration error estimator based on Dirichlet kernel density estimates, which asymptotically converg… ▽ More Calibrated probabilistic classifiers are models whose predicted probabilities can directly be interpreted as uncertainty estimates. It has been shown recently that deep neural networks are poorly calibrated and tend to output overconfident predictions. As a remedy, we propose a low-bias, trainable calibration error estimator based on Dirichlet kernel density estimates, which asymptotically converges to the true $L_p$ calibration error. This novel estimator enables us to tackle the strongest notion of multiclass calibration, called canonical (or distribution) calibration, while other common calibration methods are tractable only for top-label and marginal calibration. The computational complexity of our estimator is $\mathcal{O}(n^2)$, the convergence rate is $\mathcal{O}(n^{-1/2})$, and it is unbiased up to $\mathcal{O}(n^{-2})$, achieved by a geometric series debiasing scheme. In practice, this means that the estimator can be applied to small subsets of data, enabling efficient estimation and mini-batch updates. The proposed method has a natural choice of kernel, and can be used to generate consistent estimates of other quantities based on conditional expectation, such as the sharpness of a probabilistic classifier. Empirical results validate the correctness of our estimator, and demonstrate its utility in canonical calibration error estimation and calibration error regularized risk minimization. △ Less

Submitted 13 October, 2022; originally announced October 2022.

Comments: To appear at NeurIPS 2022

Meta-Cal: Well-controlled Post-hoc Calibration by Ranking

Authors: Xingchen Ma, Matthew B. Blaschko

Abstract: In many applications, it is desirable that a classifier not only makes accurate predictions, but also outputs calibrated posterior probabilities. However, many existing classifiers, especially deep neural network classifiers, tend to be uncalibrated. Post-hoc calibration is a technique to recalibrate a model by learning a calibration map. Existing approaches mostly focus on constructing calibratio… ▽ More In many applications, it is desirable that a classifier not only makes accurate predictions, but also outputs calibrated posterior probabilities. However, many existing classifiers, especially deep neural network classifiers, tend to be uncalibrated. Post-hoc calibration is a technique to recalibrate a model by learning a calibration map. Existing approaches mostly focus on constructing calibration maps with low calibration errors, however, this quality is inadequate for a calibrator being useful. In this paper, we introduce two constraints that are worth consideration in designing a calibration map for post-hoc calibration. Then we present Meta-Cal, which is built from a base calibrator and a ranking model. Under some mild assumptions, two high-probability bounds are given with respect to these constraints. Empirical results on CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100 and ImageNet and a range of popular network architectures show our proposed method significantly outperforms the current state of the art for post-hoc multi-class classification calibration. △ Less

Submitted 23 June, 2021; v1 submitted 10 May, 2021; originally announced May 2021.

Additive Tree-Structured Conditional Parameter Spaces in Bayesian Optimization: A Novel Covariance Function and a Fast Implementation

Authors: Xingchen Ma, Matthew B. Blaschko

Abstract: Bayesian optimization (BO) is a sample-efficient global optimization algorithm for black-box functions which are expensive to evaluate. Existing literature on model based optimization in conditional parameter spaces are usually built on trees. In this work, we generalize the additive assumption to tree-structured functions and propose an additive tree-structured covariance function, showing improv… ▽ More Bayesian optimization (BO) is a sample-efficient global optimization algorithm for black-box functions which are expensive to evaluate. Existing literature on model based optimization in conditional parameter spaces are usually built on trees. In this work, we generalize the additive assumption to tree-structured functions and propose an additive tree-structured covariance function, showing improved sample-efficiency, wider applicability and greater flexibility. Furthermore, by incorporating the structure information of parameter spaces and the additive assumption in the BO loop, we develop a parallel algorithm to optimize the acquisition function and this optimization can be performed in a low dimensional space. We demonstrate our method on an optimization benchmark function, on a neural network compression problem, on pruning pre-trained VGG16 and ResNet50 models as well as on searching activation functions of ResNet20. Experimental results show our approach significantly outperforms the current state of the art for conditional parameter optimization including SMAC, TPE and Jenatton et al. (2017). △ Less

Submitted 6 October, 2020; originally announced October 2020.

Comments: Code available at https://github.com/maxc01/addtree. arXiv admin note: substantial text overlap with arXiv:2006.11771

Additive Tree-Structured Covariance Function for Conditional Parameter Spaces in Bayesian Optimization

Authors: Xingchen Ma, Matthew B. Blaschko

Abstract: Bayesian optimization (BO) is a sample-efficient global optimization algorithm for black-box functions which are expensive to evaluate. Existing literature on model based optimization in conditional parameter spaces are usually built on trees. In this work, we generalize the additive assumption to tree-structured functions and propose an additive tree-structured covariance function, showing improv… ▽ More Bayesian optimization (BO) is a sample-efficient global optimization algorithm for black-box functions which are expensive to evaluate. Existing literature on model based optimization in conditional parameter spaces are usually built on trees. In this work, we generalize the additive assumption to tree-structured functions and propose an additive tree-structured covariance function, showing improved sample-efficiency, wider applicability and greater flexibility. Furthermore, by incorporating the structure information of parameter spaces and the additive assumption in the BO loop, we develop a parallel algorithm to optimize the acquisition function and this optimization can be performed in a low dimensional space. We demonstrate our method on an optimization benchmark function, as well as on a neural network model compression problem, and experimental results show our approach significantly outperforms the current state of the art for conditional parameter optimization including SMAC, TPE and Jenatton et al. (2017). △ Less

Submitted 21 June, 2020; originally announced June 2020.

Comments: AISTATS2020. Code link: https://github.com/maxc01/addtree

Discriminative training of conditional random fields with probably submodular constraints

Authors: Maxim Berman, Matthew B. Blaschko

Abstract: Problems of segmentation, denoising, registration and 3D reconstruction are often addressed with the graph cut algorithm. However, solving an unconstrained graph cut problem is NP-hard. For tractable optimization, pairwise potentials have to fulfill the submodularity inequality. In our learning paradigm, pairwise potentials are created as the dot product of a learned vector w with positive feature… ▽ More Problems of segmentation, denoising, registration and 3D reconstruction are often addressed with the graph cut algorithm. However, solving an unconstrained graph cut problem is NP-hard. For tractable optimization, pairwise potentials have to fulfill the submodularity inequality. In our learning paradigm, pairwise potentials are created as the dot product of a learned vector w with positive feature vectors. In order to constrain such a model to remain tractable, previous approaches have enforced the weight vector to be positive for pairwise potentials in which the labels differ, and set pairwise potentials to zero in the case that the label remains the same. Such constraints are sufficient to guarantee that the resulting pairwise potentials satisfy the submodularity inequality. However, we show that such an approach unnecessarily restricts the capacity of the learned models. Guaranteeing submodularity for all possible inputs, no matter how improbable, reduces inference error to effectively zero, but increases model error. In contrast, we relax the requirement of guaranteed submodularity to solutions that are probably approximately submodular. We show that the conceptually simple strategy of enforcing submodularity on the training examples guarantees with low sample complexity that test images will also yield submodular pairwise potentials. Results are presented in the binary and muticlass settings, showing substantial improvement from the resulting increased model capacity. △ Less

Submitted 25 November, 2019; originally announced November 2019.

Comments: 14 pages

Yes, IoU loss is submodular - as a function of the mispredictions

Authors: Maxim Berman, Matthew B. Blaschko, Amal Rannen Triki, Jiaqian Yu

Abstract: This note is a response to [7] in which it is claimed that [13, Proposition 11] is false. We demonstrate here that this assertion in [7] is false, and is based on a misreading of the notion of set membership in [13, Proposition 11]. We maintain that [13, Proposition 11] is true. ([7] = arXiv:1809.00593, [13] = arXiv:1512.07797) This note is a response to [7] in which it is claimed that [13, Proposition 11] is false. We demonstrate here that this assertion in [7] is false, and is based on a misreading of the notion of set membership in [13, Proposition 11]. We maintain that [13, Proposition 11] is true. ([7] = arXiv:1809.00593, [13] = arXiv:1512.07797) △ Less

Submitted 6 September, 2018; originally announced September 2018.

Function Norms and Regularization in Deep Networks

Authors: Amal Rannen Triki, Maxim Berman, Matthew B. Blaschko

Abstract: Deep neural networks (DNNs) have become increasingly important due to their excellent empirical performance on a wide range of problems. However, regularization is generally achieved by indirect means, largely due to the complex set of functions defined by a network and the difficulty in measuring function complexity. There exists no method in the literature for additive regularization based on a… ▽ More Deep neural networks (DNNs) have become increasingly important due to their excellent empirical performance on a wide range of problems. However, regularization is generally achieved by indirect means, largely due to the complex set of functions defined by a network and the difficulty in measuring function complexity. There exists no method in the literature for additive regularization based on a norm of the function, as is classically considered in statistical learning theory. In this work, we propose sampling-based approximations to weighted function norms as regularizers for deep neural networks. We provide, to the best of our knowledge, the first proof in the literature of the NP-hardness of computing function norms of DNNs, motivating the necessity of an approximate approach. We then derive a generalization bound for functions trained with weighted norms and prove that a natural stochastic optimization strategy minimizes the bound. Finally, we empirically validate the improved performance of the proposed regularization strategies for both convex function sets as well as DNNs on real-world classification and image segmentation tasks demonstrating improved performance over weight decay, dropout, and batch normalization. Source code will be released at the time of publication. △ Less

Submitted 28 June, 2018; v1 submitted 18 October, 2017; originally announced October 2017.

Comments: 17 pages, 8 figures

Encoder Based Lifelong Learning

Authors: Amal Rannen Triki, Rahaf Aljundi, Mathew B. Blaschko, Tinne Tuytelaars

Abstract: This paper introduces a new lifelong learning solution where a single model is trained for a sequence of tasks. The main challenge that vision systems face in this context is catastrophic forgetting: as they tend to adapt to the most recently seen task, they lose performance on the tasks that were learned previously. Our method aims at preserving the knowledge of the previous tasks while learning… ▽ More This paper introduces a new lifelong learning solution where a single model is trained for a sequence of tasks. The main challenge that vision systems face in this context is catastrophic forgetting: as they tend to adapt to the most recently seen task, they lose performance on the tasks that were learned previously. Our method aims at preserving the knowledge of the previous tasks while learning a new one by using autoencoders. For each task, an under-complete autoencoder is learned, capturing the features that are crucial for its achievement. When a new task is presented to the system, we prevent the reconstructions of the features with these autoencoders from changing, which has the effect of preserving the information on which the previous tasks are mainly relying. At the same time, the features are given space to adjust to the most recent environment as only their projection into a low dimension submanifold is controlled. The proposed system is evaluated on image classification tasks and shows a reduction of forgetting over the state-of-the-art △ Less

Submitted 6 April, 2017; originally announced April 2017.

Intraoperative margin assessment of human breast tissue in optical coherence tomography images using deep neural networks

Authors: Amal Rannen Triki, Matthew B. Blaschko, Yoon Mo Jung, Seungri Song, Hyun Ju Han, Seung Il Kim, Chulmin Joo

Abstract: Objective: In this work, we perform margin assessment of human breast tissue from optical coherence tomography (OCT) images using deep neural networks (DNNs). This work simulates an intraoperative setting for breast cancer lumpectomy. Methods: To train the DNNs, we use both the state-of-the-art methods (Weight Decay and DropOut) and a newly introduced regularization method based on function norms.… ▽ More Objective: In this work, we perform margin assessment of human breast tissue from optical coherence tomography (OCT) images using deep neural networks (DNNs). This work simulates an intraoperative setting for breast cancer lumpectomy. Methods: To train the DNNs, we use both the state-of-the-art methods (Weight Decay and DropOut) and a newly introduced regularization method based on function norms. Commonly used methods can fail when only a small database is available. The use of a function norm introduces a direct control over the complexity of the function with the aim of diminishing the risk of overfitting. Results: As neither the code nor the data of previous results are publicly available, the obtained results are compared with reported results in the literature for a conservative comparison. Moreover, our method is applied to locally collected data on several data configurations. The reported results are the average over the different trials. Conclusion: The experimental results show that the use of DNNs yields significantly better results than other techniques when evaluated in terms of sensitivity, specificity, F1 score, G-mean and Matthews correlation coefficient. Function norm regularization yielded higher and more robust results than competing methods. Significance: We have demonstrated a system that shows high promise for (partially) automated margin assessment of human breast tissue, Equal error rate (EER) is reduced from approximately 12\% (the lowest reported in the literature) to 5\%\,--\,a 58\% reduction. The method is computationally feasible for intraoperative application (less than 2 seconds per image). △ Less

Submitted 31 March, 2017; originally announced March 2017.

Comments: 16 pages, 9 figures

Stochastic Function Norm Regularization of Deep Networks

Authors: Amal Rannen Triki, Matthew B. Blaschko

Abstract: Deep neural networks have had an enormous impact on image analysis. State-of-the-art training methods, based on weight decay and DropOut, result in impressive performance when a very large training set is available. However, they tend to have large problems overfitting to small data sets. Indeed, the available regularization methods deal with the complexity of the network function only indirectly.… ▽ More Deep neural networks have had an enormous impact on image analysis. State-of-the-art training methods, based on weight decay and DropOut, result in impressive performance when a very large training set is available. However, they tend to have large problems overfitting to small data sets. Indeed, the available regularization methods deal with the complexity of the network function only indirectly. In this paper, we study the feasibility of directly using the $L_2$ function norm for regularization. Two methods to integrate this new regularization in the stochastic backpropagation are proposed. Moreover, the convergence of these new algorithms is studied. We finally show that they outperform the state-of-the-art methods in the low sample regime on benchmark datasets (MNIST and CIFAR10). The obtained results demonstrate very clear improvement, especially in the context of small sample regimes with data laying in a low dimensional manifold. Source code of the method can be found at \url{https://github.com/AmalRT/DNN_Reg}. △ Less

Submitted 30 August, 2019; v1 submitted 29 May, 2016; originally announced May 2016.

Comments: arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:1710.06703

Testing for Differences in Gaussian Graphical Models: Applications to Brain Connectivity

Authors: Eugene Belilovsky, Gaël Varoquaux, Matthew B. Blaschko

Abstract: Functional brain networks are well described and estimated from data with Gaussian Graphical Models (GGMs), e.g. using sparse inverse covariance estimators. Comparing functional connectivity of subjects in two populations calls for comparing these estimated GGMs. Our goal is to identify differences in GGMs known to have similar structure. We characterize the uncertainty of differences with confide… ▽ More Functional brain networks are well described and estimated from data with Gaussian Graphical Models (GGMs), e.g. using sparse inverse covariance estimators. Comparing functional connectivity of subjects in two populations calls for comparing these estimated GGMs. Our goal is to identify differences in GGMs known to have similar structure. We characterize the uncertainty of differences with confidence intervals obtained using a parametric distribution on parameters of a sparse estimator. Sparse penalties enable statistical guarantees and interpretable models even in high-dimensional and low-sample settings. Characterizing the distributions of sparse models is inherently challenging as the penalties produce a biased estimator. Recent work invokes the sparsity assumptions to effectively remove the bias from a sparse estimator such as the lasso. These distributions can be used to give confidence intervals on edges in GGMs, and by extension their differences. However, in the case of comparing GGMs, these estimators do not make use of any assumed joint structure among the GGMs. Inspired by priors from brain functional connectivity we derive the distribution of parameter differences under a joint penalty when parameters are known to be sparse in the difference. This leads us to introduce the debiased multi-task fused lasso, whose distribution can be characterized in an efficient manner. We then show how the debiased lasso and multi-task fused lasso can be used to obtain confidence intervals on edge differences in GGMs. We validate the techniques proposed on a set of synthetic examples as well as neuro-imaging dataset created for the study of autism. △ Less

Submitted 18 November, 2016; v1 submitted 29 December, 2015; originally announced December 2015.

Journal ref: Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS) 2016, Dec 2016, Barcelona, Spain

A Test of Relative Similarity For Model Selection in Generative Models

Authors: Wacha Bounliphone, Eugene Belilovsky, Matthew B. Blaschko, Ioannis Antonoglou, Arthur Gretton

Abstract: Probabilistic generative models provide a powerful framework for representing data that avoids the expense of manual annotation typically needed by discriminative approaches. Model selection in this generative setting can be challenging, however, particularly when likelihoods are not easily accessible. To address this issue, we introduce a statistical test of relative similarity, which is used to… ▽ More Probabilistic generative models provide a powerful framework for representing data that avoids the expense of manual annotation typically needed by discriminative approaches. Model selection in this generative setting can be challenging, however, particularly when likelihoods are not easily accessible. To address this issue, we introduce a statistical test of relative similarity, which is used to determine which of two models generates samples that are significantly closer to a real-world reference dataset of interest. We use as our test statistic the difference in maximum mean discrepancies (MMDs) between the reference dataset and each model dataset, and derive a powerful, low-variance test based on the joint asymptotic distribution of the MMDs between each reference-model pair. In experiments on deep generative models, including the variational auto-encoder and generative moment matching network, the tests provide a meaningful ranking of model performance as a function of parameter and training settings. △ Less

Submitted 15 February, 2016; v1 submitted 14 November, 2015; originally announced November 2015.

Comments: International Conference on Learning Representations 2016