Showing 1–1 of 1 results for author: Asai, S

Debiased maximum-likelihood estimators for hazard ratios under kernel-based machine-learning adjustment

Authors: Takashi Hayakawa, Satoshi Asai

Abstract: Previous studies have shown that hazard ratios between treatment groups estimated with the Cox model are uninterpretable because the unspecified baseline hazard of the model fails to identify temporal change in the risk set composition due to treatment assignment and unobserved factors among multiple, contradictory scenarios. To alleviate this problem, especially in studies based on observational… ▽ More Previous studies have shown that hazard ratios between treatment groups estimated with the Cox model are uninterpretable because the unspecified baseline hazard of the model fails to identify temporal change in the risk set composition due to treatment assignment and unobserved factors among multiple, contradictory scenarios. To alleviate this problem, especially in studies based on observational data with uncontrolled dynamic treatment and real-time measurement of many covariates, we propose abandoning the baseline hazard and using kernel-based machine learning to explicitly model the change in the risk set with or without latent variables. For this framework, we clarify the context in which hazard ratios can be causally interpreted, and then develop a method based on Neyman orthogonality to compute debiased maximum-likelihood estimators of hazard ratios, proving necessary convergence results. Numerical simulations confirm that the proposed method identifies the true hazard ratios with minimal bias. These results lay the foundation for developing a useful, alternative method for causal inference with uncontrolled, observational data in modern epidemiology. △ Less

Submitted 2 September, 2025; v1 submitted 23 July, 2025; originally announced July 2025.

Comments: Proposition 3 of the first version was wrong. This was fixed by introducing new theoretical results in the second version so that all of the claims of the first version are valid For some reason, in the uploading of the second version, a duplicate of the first version was wrongly publicized, which we think is not our mistake. We therefore upload the updated version as version 3