Computational Considerations for the Linear Model of Coregionalization
Authors:
Renaud Alie,
David A. Stephens,
Alexandra M. Schmidt
Abstract:
In the last two decades, the linear model of coregionalization (LMC) has been widely used to model multivariate spatial processes. However, it can be a challenging task to conduct likelihood-based inference for such models because of the cubic cost associated with Gaussian likelihood evaluations. Starting from an analogy with matrix normal models, we propose a reformulation of the LMC likelihood t…
▽ More
In the last two decades, the linear model of coregionalization (LMC) has been widely used to model multivariate spatial processes. However, it can be a challenging task to conduct likelihood-based inference for such models because of the cubic cost associated with Gaussian likelihood evaluations. Starting from an analogy with matrix normal models, we propose a reformulation of the LMC likelihood that highlights the linear, rather than cubic, computational complexity as a function of the dimension of the response vector. We describe how those simplifications can be exploited in Gaussian hierarchical models. In addition, we propose a new sparsity-inducing approach to the LMC that introduces structural zeros in the coregionalization matrix in an attempt to reduce the number of parameters in a principled and data-driven way. Our reformulation of the LMC likelihood ensures that our sparse approach comes at virtually no additional cost when included in a Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) algorithm. It is shown, on synthetic data, to significantly improve predictive performance. We also apply our methodology to a dataset comprised of air pollutant measurements from the state of California. We investigate the strength of the correlation among the measurements by providing new insights from our sparse method.
△ Less
Submitted 2 December, 2024; v1 submitted 13 February, 2024;
originally announced February 2024.
Bayesian Analysis of Sigmoidal Gaussian Cox Processes via Data Augmentation
Authors:
Renaud Alie,
David A. Stephens,
Alexandra M. Schmidt
Abstract:
Many models for point process data are defined through a thinning procedure where locations of a base process (often Poisson) are either kept (observed) or discarded (thinned). In this paper, we go back to the fundamentals of the distribution theory for point processes to establish a link between the base thinning mechanism and the joint density of thinned and observed locations in any of such mod…
▽ More
Many models for point process data are defined through a thinning procedure where locations of a base process (often Poisson) are either kept (observed) or discarded (thinned). In this paper, we go back to the fundamentals of the distribution theory for point processes to establish a link between the base thinning mechanism and the joint density of thinned and observed locations in any of such models. In practice, the marginal model of observed points is often intractable, but thinned locations can be instantiated from their conditional distribution and typical data augmentation schemes can be employed to circumvent this problem. Such approaches have been employed in the recent literature, but some inconsistencies have been introduced across the different publications. We concentrate on an example: the so-called sigmoidal Gaussian Cox process. We apply our approach to resolve contradicting viewpoints in the data augmentation step of the inference procedures therein. We also provide a multitype extension to this process and conduct Bayesian inference on data consisting of positions of two different species of trees in Lansing Woods, Michigan. The emphasis is put on intertype dependence modeling with Bayesian uncertainty quantification.
△ Less
Submitted 10 December, 2024; v1 submitted 13 March, 2022;
originally announced March 2022.
