Showing 1–9 of 9 results for author: Zaffalon, M

Connecting classical finite exchangeability to quantum theory

Authors: Alessio Benavoli, Alessandro Facchini, Marco Zaffalon

Abstract: Exchangeability is a fundamental concept in probability theory and statistics. It allows to model situations where the order of observations does not matter. The classical de Finetti's theorem provides a representation of infinitely exchangeable sequences of random variables as mixtures of independent and identically distributed variables. The quantum de Finetti theorem extends this result to symm… ▽ More Exchangeability is a fundamental concept in probability theory and statistics. It allows to model situations where the order of observations does not matter. The classical de Finetti's theorem provides a representation of infinitely exchangeable sequences of random variables as mixtures of independent and identically distributed variables. The quantum de Finetti theorem extends this result to symmetric quantum states on tensor product Hilbert spaces. It is well known that both theorems do not hold for finitely exchangeable sequences. The aim of this work is to investigate two lesser-known representation theorems, which were developed in classical probability theory to extend de Finetti's theorem to finitely exchangeable sequences by using quasi-probabilities and quasi-expectations. With the aid of these theorems, we illustrate how a de Finetti-like representation theorem for finitely exchangeable sequences can be formulated through a mathematical representation which is formally equivalent to quantum theory (with boson-symmetric density matrices). We then show a promising application of this connection to the challenge of defining entanglement for indistinguishable bosons. △ Less

Submitted 28 November, 2024; v1 submitted 6 June, 2023; originally announced June 2023.

Why we should interpret density matrices as moment matrices: the case of (in)distinguishable particles and the emergence of classical reality

Authors: Alessio Benavoli, Alessandro Facchini, Marco Zaffalon

Abstract: We introduce a formulation of quantum theory (QT) as a general probabilistic theory but expressed via quasi-expectation operators (QEOs). This formulation provides a direct interpretation of density matrices as quasi-moment matrices. Using QEOs, we will provide a series of representation theorems, a' la de Finetti, relating a classical probability mass function (satisfying certain symmetries) to a… ▽ More We introduce a formulation of quantum theory (QT) as a general probabilistic theory but expressed via quasi-expectation operators (QEOs). This formulation provides a direct interpretation of density matrices as quasi-moment matrices. Using QEOs, we will provide a series of representation theorems, a' la de Finetti, relating a classical probability mass function (satisfying certain symmetries) to a quasi-expectation operator. We will show that QT for both distinguishable and indistinguishable particles can be formulated in this way. Although particles indistinguishability is considered a truly "weird" quantum phenomenon, it is not special. We will show that finitely exchangeable probabilities for a classical dice are as weird as QT. Using this connection, we will rederive the first and second quantisation in QT for bosons through the classical statistical concept of exchangeable random variables. Using this approach, we will show how classical reality emerges in QT as the number of identical bosons increases (similar to what happens for finitely exchangeable sequences of rolls of a classical dice). △ Less

Submitted 9 March, 2022; v1 submitted 8 March, 2022; originally announced March 2022.

Quantum indistinguishability through exchangeable desirable gambles

Authors: Alessio Benavoli, Alessandro Facchini, Marco Zaffalon

Abstract: Two particles are identical if all their intrinsic properties, such as spin and charge, are the same, meaning that no quantum experiment can distinguish them. In addition to the well known principles of quantum mechanics, understanding systems of identical particles requires a new postulate, the so called symmetrization postulate. In this work, we show that the postulate corresponds to exchangeabi… ▽ More Two particles are identical if all their intrinsic properties, such as spin and charge, are the same, meaning that no quantum experiment can distinguish them. In addition to the well known principles of quantum mechanics, understanding systems of identical particles requires a new postulate, the so called symmetrization postulate. In this work, we show that the postulate corresponds to exchangeability assessments for sets of observables (gambles) in a quantum experiment, when quantum mechanics is seen as a normative and algorithmic theory guiding an agent to assess her subjective beliefs represented as (coherent) sets of gambles. Finally, we show how sets of exchangeable observables (gambles) may be updated after a measurement and discuss the issue of defining entanglement for indistinguishable particle systems. △ Less

Submitted 10 May, 2021; originally announced May 2021.

Bernstein's socks and polynomial-time provable coherence

Authors: Alessio Benavoli, Alessandro Facchini, Marco Zaffalon

Abstract: We recently introduced a bounded rationality approach for the theory of desirable gambles. It is based on the unique requirement that being non-negative for a gamble has to be defined so that it can be provable in polynomial-time. In this paper we continue to investigate properties of this class of models. In particular we verify that the space of Bernstein polynomials in which non-negativity is s… ▽ More We recently introduced a bounded rationality approach for the theory of desirable gambles. It is based on the unique requirement that being non-negative for a gamble has to be defined so that it can be provable in polynomial-time. In this paper we continue to investigate properties of this class of models. In particular we verify that the space of Bernstein polynomials in which non-negativity is specified by the Krivine-Vasilescu certificate is yet another instance of this theory. As a consequence, we show how it is possible to construct in it a thought experiment uncovering entanglement with classical (hence non quantum) coins. △ Less

Submitted 11 March, 2019; originally announced March 2019.

Computational Complexity and the Nature of Quantum Mechanics

Authors: Alessio Benavoli, Alessandro Facchini, Marco Zaffalon

Abstract: Quantum theory (QT) has been confirmed by numerous experiments, yet we still cannot fully grasp the meaning of the theory. As a consequence, the quantum world appears to us paradoxical. Here we shed new light on QT by being based on two main postulates: 1. the theory should be logically consistent; 2. inferences in the theory should be computable in polynomial time. The first postulate is what we… ▽ More Quantum theory (QT) has been confirmed by numerous experiments, yet we still cannot fully grasp the meaning of the theory. As a consequence, the quantum world appears to us paradoxical. Here we shed new light on QT by being based on two main postulates: 1. the theory should be logically consistent; 2. inferences in the theory should be computable in polynomial time. The first postulate is what we require to each well-founded mathematical theory. The computation postulate defines the physical component of the theory. We show that the computation postulate is the only true divide between QT, seen as a generalised theory of probability, and classical probability. All quantum paradoxes, and entanglement in particular, arise from the clash of trying to reconcile a computationally intractable, somewhat idealised, theory (classical physics) with a computationally tractable theory (QT) or, in other words, from regarding physics as fundamental rather than computation. △ Less

Submitted 20 May, 2019; v1 submitted 12 February, 2019; originally announced February 2019.

Comments: arXiv admin note: substantial text overlap with arXiv:1902.03513

Computational Complexity and the Nature of Quantum Mechanics (Extended version)

Authors: Alessio Benavoli, Alessandro Facchini, Marco Zaffalon

Abstract: Quantum theory (QT) has been confirmed by numerous experiments, yet we still cannot fully grasp the meaning of the theory. As a consequence, the quantum world appears to us paradoxical. Here we shed new light on QT by having it follow from two main postulates (i) the theory should be logically consistent; (ii) inferences in the theory should be computable in polynomial time. The first postulate is… ▽ More Quantum theory (QT) has been confirmed by numerous experiments, yet we still cannot fully grasp the meaning of the theory. As a consequence, the quantum world appears to us paradoxical. Here we shed new light on QT by having it follow from two main postulates (i) the theory should be logically consistent; (ii) inferences in the theory should be computable in polynomial time. The first postulate is what we require to each well-founded mathematical theory. The computation postulate defines the physical component of the theory. We show that the computation postulate is the only true divide between QT, seen as a generalised theory of probability, and classical probability. All quantum paradoxes, and entanglement in particular, arise from the clash of trying to reconcile a computationally intractable, somewhat idealised, theory (classical physics) with a computationally tractable theory (QT) or, in other words, from regarding physics as fundamental rather than computation. △ Less

Submitted 9 February, 2019; originally announced February 2019.

Quantum rational preferences and desirability

Authors: Alessio Benavoli, Alessandro Facchini, Marco Zaffalon

Abstract: We develop a theory of quantum rational decision making in the tradition of Anscombe and Aumann's axiomatisation of preferences on horse lotteries. It is essentially the Bayesian decision theory generalised to the space of Hermitian matrices. Among other things, this leads us to give a representation theorem showing that quantum complete rational preferences are obtained by means of expected utili… ▽ More We develop a theory of quantum rational decision making in the tradition of Anscombe and Aumann's axiomatisation of preferences on horse lotteries. It is essentially the Bayesian decision theory generalised to the space of Hermitian matrices. Among other things, this leads us to give a representation theorem showing that quantum complete rational preferences are obtained by means of expected utility considerations. △ Less

Submitted 7 December, 2016; v1 submitted 21 October, 2016; originally announced October 2016.

A Gleason-type theorem for any dimension based on a gambling formulation of Quantum Mechanics

Authors: Alessio Benavoli, Alessandro Facchini, Marco Zaffalon

Abstract: Based on a gambling formulation of quantum mechanics, we derive a Gleason-type theorem that holds for any dimension n of a quantum system, and in particular for n = 2. The theorem states that the only logically consistent probability assignments are exactly the ones that are definable as the trace of the product of a projector and a density matrix operator. In addition, we detail the reason why di… ▽ More Based on a gambling formulation of quantum mechanics, we derive a Gleason-type theorem that holds for any dimension n of a quantum system, and in particular for n = 2. The theorem states that the only logically consistent probability assignments are exactly the ones that are definable as the trace of the product of a projector and a density matrix operator. In addition, we detail the reason why dispersion-free probabilities are actually not valid, or rational, probabilities for quantum mechanics, and hence should be excluded from consideration. △ Less

Submitted 19 May, 2017; v1 submitted 11 June, 2016; originally announced June 2016.

Comments: arXiv admin note: substantial text overlap with arXiv:1605.08177. The overlapping is due to the fact that the present paper uses definitions introduced in arXiv:1605.08177

Quantum mechanics: The Bayesian theory generalised to the space of Hermitian matrices

Authors: Alessio Benavoli, Alessandro Facchini, Marco Zaffalon

Abstract: We consider the problem of gambling on a quantum experiment and enforce rational behaviour by a few rules. These rules yield, in the classical case, the Bayesian theory of probability via duality theorems. In our quantum setting, they yield the Bayesian theory generalised to the space of Hermitian matrices. This very theory is quantum mechanics: in fact, we derive all its four postulates from the… ▽ More We consider the problem of gambling on a quantum experiment and enforce rational behaviour by a few rules. These rules yield, in the classical case, the Bayesian theory of probability via duality theorems. In our quantum setting, they yield the Bayesian theory generalised to the space of Hermitian matrices. This very theory is quantum mechanics: in fact, we derive all its four postulates from the generalised Bayesian theory. This implies that quantum mechanics is self-consistent. It also leads us to reinterpret the main operations in quantum mechanics as probability rules: Bayes' rule (measurement), marginalisation (partial tracing), independence (tensor product). To say it with a slogan, we obtain that quantum mechanics is the Bayesian theory in the complex numbers. △ Less

Submitted 23 September, 2016; v1 submitted 26 May, 2016; originally announced May 2016.

Comments: This paper has been accepted to Physics Review A

Journal ref: Phys. Rev. A 94, 042106 (2016)