-
Quantum Optimization Benchmark Library -- The Intractable Decathlon
Authors:
Thorsten Koch,
David E. Bernal Neira,
Ying Chen,
Giorgio Cortiana,
Daniel J. Egger,
Raoul Heese,
Narendra N. Hegade,
Alejandro Gomez Cadavid,
Rhea Huang,
Toshinari Itoko,
Thomas Kleinert,
Pedro Maciel Xavier,
Naeimeh Mohseni,
Jhon A. Montanez-Barrera,
Koji Nakano,
Giacomo Nannicini,
Corey O'Meara,
Justin Pauckert,
Manuel Proissl,
Anurag Ramesh,
Maximilian Schicker,
Noriaki Shimada,
Mitsuharu Takeori,
Victor Valls,
David Van Bulck
, et al. (2 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Through recent progress in hardware development, quantum computers have advanced to the point where benchmarking of (heuristic) quantum algorithms at scale is within reach. Particularly in combinatorial optimization -- where most algorithms are heuristics -- it is key to empirically analyze their performance on hardware and track progress towards quantum advantage. To this extent, we present ten o…
▽ More
Through recent progress in hardware development, quantum computers have advanced to the point where benchmarking of (heuristic) quantum algorithms at scale is within reach. Particularly in combinatorial optimization -- where most algorithms are heuristics -- it is key to empirically analyze their performance on hardware and track progress towards quantum advantage. To this extent, we present ten optimization problem classes that are difficult for existing classical algorithms and can (mostly) be linked to practically-relevant applications, with the goal to enable systematic, fair, and comparable benchmarks for quantum optimization methods. Further, we introduce the Quantum Optimization Benchmark Library (QOBLIB) where the problem instances and solution track records can be found. The individual properties of the problem classes vary in terms of objective and variable type, coefficient ranges, and density. Crucially, they all become challenging for established classical methods already at system sizes ranging from less than 100 to, at most, an order of 100,000 decision variables, allowing to approach them with today's quantum computers. We reference the results from state-of-the-art solvers for instances from all problem classes and demonstrate exemplary baseline results obtained with quantum solvers for selected problems. The baseline results illustrate a standardized form to present benchmarking solutions, which has been designed to ensure comparability of the used methods, reproducibility of the respective results, and trackability of algorithmic and hardware improvements over time. We encourage the optimization community to explore the performance of available classical or quantum algorithms and hardware platforms with the benchmarking problem instances presented in this work toward demonstrating quantum advantage in optimization.
△ Less
Submitted 4 April, 2025;
originally announced April 2025.
-
Mitigating exponential concentration in covariant quantum kernels for subspace and real-world data
Authors:
Gabriele Agliardi,
Giorgio Cortiana,
Anton Dekusar,
Kumar Ghosh,
Naeimeh Mohseni,
Corey O'Meara,
Víctor Valls,
Kavitha Yogaraj,
Sergiy Zhuk
Abstract:
Fidelity quantum kernels have shown promise in classification tasks, particularly when a group structure in the data can be identified and exploited through a covariant feature map. In fact, there exist classification problems on which covariant kernels provide a provable advantage, thus establishing a separation between quantum and classical learners. However, their practical application poses tw…
▽ More
Fidelity quantum kernels have shown promise in classification tasks, particularly when a group structure in the data can be identified and exploited through a covariant feature map. In fact, there exist classification problems on which covariant kernels provide a provable advantage, thus establishing a separation between quantum and classical learners. However, their practical application poses two challenges: on one side, the group structure may be unknown and approximate in real-world data, and on the other side, scaling to the `utility' regime (above 100 qubits) is affected by exponential concentration. In this work, we address said challenges by applying fidelity kernels to real-world data with unknown structure, related to the scheduling of a fleet of electric vehicles, and to synthetic data generated from the union of subspaces, which is then close to many relevant real-world datasets. Furthermore, we propose a novel error mitigation strategy specifically tailored for fidelity kernels, called Bit Flip Tolerance (BFT), to alleviate the exponential concentration in our utility-scale experiments. Our multiclass classification reaches accuracies comparable to classical SVCs up to 156 qubits, thus constituting the largest experimental demonstration of quantum machine learning on IBM devices to date. For the real-world data experiments, the effect of the proposed BFT becomes manifest on 40+ qubits, where mitigated accuracies reach 80%, in line with classical, compared to 33% without BFT. Through the union-of-subspace synthetic dataset with 156 qubits, we demonstrate a mitigated accuracy of 80%, compared to 83% of classical models, and 37% of unmitigated quantum, using a test set of limited size.
△ Less
Submitted 10 December, 2024;
originally announced December 2024.
-
On the Capacity of the Quantum Switch with and without Entanglement Decoherence
Authors:
Víctor Valls,
Panagiotis Promponas,
Leandros Tassiulas
Abstract:
This paper studies the capacity of the quantum switch for two decoherence models: when link-level entanglements last (i) for a time slot, or (ii) until they are used to serve a request (i.e., there is no decoherence). The two models are important as they set lower and upper bounds on the capacity region for any other decoherence model. The paper's contributions are to characterize the switch capac…
▽ More
This paper studies the capacity of the quantum switch for two decoherence models: when link-level entanglements last (i) for a time slot, or (ii) until they are used to serve a request (i.e., there is no decoherence). The two models are important as they set lower and upper bounds on the capacity region for any other decoherence model. The paper's contributions are to characterize the switch capacity region for both decoherence models and to propose throughput-optimal policies based on gradient descent.
△ Less
Submitted 29 July, 2024;
originally announced July 2024.
-
A Brief Introduction to Quantum Network Control
Authors:
Víctor Valls,
Panagiotis Promponas,
Leandros Tassiulas
Abstract:
Quantum networking is an emerging area with the potential to transform information processing and communications. In this paper, we present a brief introduction to quantum network control, an area in quantum networking dedicated to designing algorithms for distributing entanglement (i.e., entangled qubits). We start by explaining what qubits and entanglement are and how they furnish quantum networ…
▽ More
Quantum networking is an emerging area with the potential to transform information processing and communications. In this paper, we present a brief introduction to quantum network control, an area in quantum networking dedicated to designing algorithms for distributing entanglement (i.e., entangled qubits). We start by explaining what qubits and entanglement are and how they furnish quantum network control operations such as entanglement swapping and teleportation. With those operations, we present a model for distributing entanglement in a multi-hop quantum network to enable applications such as quantum key distribution and distributed quantum computing. We conclude the paper by presenting open research problems in the field, including the characterization of the quantum network capacity region and the design of throughput-optimal policies.
△ Less
Submitted 29 July, 2024;
originally announced July 2024.
-
Challenges and Opportunities in Quantum Optimization
Authors:
Amira Abbas,
Andris Ambainis,
Brandon Augustino,
Andreas Bärtschi,
Harry Buhrman,
Carleton Coffrin,
Giorgio Cortiana,
Vedran Dunjko,
Daniel J. Egger,
Bruce G. Elmegreen,
Nicola Franco,
Filippo Fratini,
Bryce Fuller,
Julien Gacon,
Constantin Gonciulea,
Sander Gribling,
Swati Gupta,
Stuart Hadfield,
Raoul Heese,
Gerhard Kircher,
Thomas Kleinert,
Thorsten Koch,
Georgios Korpas,
Steve Lenk,
Jakub Marecek
, et al. (21 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Recent advances in quantum computers are demonstrating the ability to solve problems at a scale beyond brute force classical simulation. As such, a widespread interest in quantum algorithms has developed in many areas, with optimization being one of the most pronounced domains. Across computer science and physics, there are a number of different approaches for major classes of optimization problem…
▽ More
Recent advances in quantum computers are demonstrating the ability to solve problems at a scale beyond brute force classical simulation. As such, a widespread interest in quantum algorithms has developed in many areas, with optimization being one of the most pronounced domains. Across computer science and physics, there are a number of different approaches for major classes of optimization problems, such as combinatorial optimization, convex optimization, non-convex optimization, and stochastic extensions. This work draws on multiple approaches to study quantum optimization. Provably exact versus heuristic settings are first explained using computational complexity theory - highlighting where quantum advantage is possible in each context. Then, the core building blocks for quantum optimization algorithms are outlined to subsequently define prominent problem classes and identify key open questions that, if answered, will advance the field. The effects of scaling relevant problems on noisy quantum devices are also outlined in detail, alongside meaningful benchmarking problems. We underscore the importance of benchmarking by proposing clear metrics to conduct appropriate comparisons with classical optimization techniques. Lastly, we highlight two domains - finance and sustainability - as rich sources of optimization problems that could be used to benchmark, and eventually validate, the potential real-world impact of quantum optimization.
△ Less
Submitted 17 November, 2024; v1 submitted 4 December, 2023;
originally announced December 2023.
