Showing 1–3 of 3 results for author: Stevens, N

Direct tests of measurement uncertainty relations: what it takes

Authors: Paul Busch, Neil Stevens

Abstract: The uncertainty principle being a cornerstone of quantum mechanics, it is surprising that in nearly 90 years there have been no direct tests of measurement uncertainty relations. This lacuna was due to the absence of two essential ingredients: appropriate measures of measurement error (and disturbance), and precise formulations of such relations that are {\em universally valid}and {\em directly te… ▽ More The uncertainty principle being a cornerstone of quantum mechanics, it is surprising that in nearly 90 years there have been no direct tests of measurement uncertainty relations. This lacuna was due to the absence of two essential ingredients: appropriate measures of measurement error (and disturbance), and precise formulations of such relations that are {\em universally valid}and {\em directly testable}. We formulate two distinct forms of direct tests, based on different measures of error. We present a prototype protocol for a direct test of measurement uncertainty relations in terms of {\em value deviation errors} (hitherto considered nonfeasible), highlighting the lack of universality of these relations. This shows that the formulation of universal, directly testable measurement uncertainty relations for {\em state-dependent} error measures remains an important open problem. Recent experiments that were claimed to constitute invalidations of Heisenberg's error-disturbance relation are shown to conform with the spirit of Heisenberg's principle if interpreted as direct tests of measurement uncertainty relations for error measures that quantify {\em distances between observables}. △ Less

Submitted 17 January, 2015; v1 submitted 29 July, 2014; originally announced July 2014.

Comments: 8 pages including Supplement. This version 2 has been substantially rewritten, including a change of title

Journal ref: Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 070402 (2015)

Steering, incompatibility, and Bell inequality violations in a class of probabilistic theories

Authors: Neil Stevens, Paul Busch

Abstract: We show that connections between a degree of incompatibility of pairs of observables and the strength of violations of Bell's inequality found in recent investigations can be extended to a general class of probabilistic physical models. It turns out that the property of universal uniform steering is sufficient for the saturation of a generalised Tsirelson bound, corresponding to maximal violations… ▽ More We show that connections between a degree of incompatibility of pairs of observables and the strength of violations of Bell's inequality found in recent investigations can be extended to a general class of probabilistic physical models. It turns out that the property of universal uniform steering is sufficient for the saturation of a generalised Tsirelson bound, corresponding to maximal violations of Bell's inequality. It is also found that a limited form of steering is still available and sufficient for such saturation in some state spaces where universal uniform steering is not given. The techniques developed here are applied to the class of regular polygon state spaces, giving a strengthening of known results. However, we also find indications that the link between incompatibility and Bell violation may be more complex than originally envisaged. △ Less

Submitted 5 December, 2013; v1 submitted 6 November, 2013; originally announced November 2013.

Comments: Minor corrections and improvements in version 2

MSC Class: 81P16

Journal ref: Physical Review A 89, 022123 (2014)

Comparing the degrees of incompatibility inherent in probabilistic physical theories

Authors: Paul Busch, Teiko Heinosaari, Jussi Schultz, Neil Stevens

Abstract: We introduce a new way of quantifying the degrees of incompatibility of two ob- servables in a probabilistic physical theory and, based on this, a global measure of the degree of incompatibility inherent in such theories, across all observable pairs. This opens up a novel and flexible way of comparing probabilistic theories with respect to the nonclassical feature of incompatibility, raising many… ▽ More We introduce a new way of quantifying the degrees of incompatibility of two ob- servables in a probabilistic physical theory and, based on this, a global measure of the degree of incompatibility inherent in such theories, across all observable pairs. This opens up a novel and flexible way of comparing probabilistic theories with respect to the nonclassical feature of incompatibility, raising many interesting questions, some of which will be answered here. We show that quantum theory contains observables that are as incompatible as any probabilistic physical theory can have if arbitrary pairs of observables are considered. If one adopts a more refined measure of the degree of incompatibility, for instance, by restricting the comparison to binary observables, it turns out that there are probabilistic theories whose inherent degree of incompatibility is greater than that of quantum mechanics. △ Less

Submitted 19 June, 2013; v1 submitted 15 October, 2012; originally announced October 2012.

Comments: Minor corrections in version 2, several new results added in version 3. Version 4 contains more detail on some proofs and terminological improvements

Journal ref: EPL, 103 (2013) 10002