-
Distinct Lifetimes for $X$ and $Z$ Loop Measurements in a Majorana Tetron Device
Authors:
Morteza Aghaee,
Zulfi Alam,
Rikke Andersen,
Mariusz Andrzejczuk,
Andrey Antipov,
Mikhail Astafev,
Lukas Avilovas,
Ahmad Azizimanesh,
Bela Bauer,
Jonathan Becker,
Umesh Kumar Bhaskar,
Andrea G. Boa,
Srini Boddapati,
Nichlaus Bohac,
Jouri D. S. Bommer,
Jan Borovsky,
Léo Bourdet,
Samuel Boutin,
Lucas Casparis,
Srivatsa Chakravarthi,
Hamidreza Chalabi,
Benjamin J. Chapman,
Nikolaos Chatzaras,
Tzu-Chiao Chien,
Jason Cho
, et al. (137 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We present a hardware realization and measurements of a tetron qubit device in a superconductor-semiconductor heterostructure. The device architecture contains two parallel superconducting nanowires, which support four Majorana zero modes (MZMs) when tuned into the topological phase, and a trivial superconducting backbone. Two distinct readout interferometers are formed by connecting the supercond…
▽ More
We present a hardware realization and measurements of a tetron qubit device in a superconductor-semiconductor heterostructure. The device architecture contains two parallel superconducting nanowires, which support four Majorana zero modes (MZMs) when tuned into the topological phase, and a trivial superconducting backbone. Two distinct readout interferometers are formed by connecting the superconducting structure to a series of quantum dots. We perform single-shot interferometric measurements of the fermion parity for the two loops, designed to implement Pauli-$X$ and $Z$ measurements of the tetron. Performing repeated single-shot measurements yields two widely separated time scales $τ_X = 14.5\pm 0.3 \, \mathrm{μs}$ and $τ_Z = 12.4\pm 0.4\, \mathrm{ms}$ for parity switches observed in the $X$ and $Z$ measurement loops, which we attribute to intra-wire parity switches and external quasiparticle poisoning, respectively. We estimate assignment errors of $\mathrm{err}^X_a=16\%$ and $\mathrm{err}^Z_a=0.5\%$ for $X$ and $Z$ measurement-based operations, respectively.
△ Less
Submitted 11 July, 2025;
originally announced July 2025.
-
Response to recent comments on Phys. Rev. B 107, 245423 (2023) and Subsection S4.3 of the Supp. Info. for Nature 638, 651-655 (2025)
Authors:
Morteza Aghaee,
Zulfi Alam,
Mariusz Andrzejczuk,
Andrey E. Antipov,
Mikhail Astafev,
Amin Barzegar,
Bela Bauer,
Jonathan Becker,
Umesh Kumar Bhaskar,
Alex Bocharov,
Srini Boddapati,
David Bohn,
Jouri Bommer,
Leo Bourdet,
Samuel Boutin,
Benjamin J. Chapman,
Sohail Chatoor,
Anna Wulff Christensen,
Patrick Codd,
William S. Cole,
Paul Cooper,
Fabiano Corsetti,
Ajuan Cui,
Andreas Ekefjärd,
Saeed Fallahi
, et al. (105 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The topological gap protocol (TGP) is a statistical test designed to identify a topological phase with high confidence and without human bias. It is used to determine a promising parameter regime for operating topological qubits. The protocol's key metric is the probability of incorrectly identifying a trivial region as topological, referred to as the false discovery rate (FDR). Two recent manuscr…
▽ More
The topological gap protocol (TGP) is a statistical test designed to identify a topological phase with high confidence and without human bias. It is used to determine a promising parameter regime for operating topological qubits. The protocol's key metric is the probability of incorrectly identifying a trivial region as topological, referred to as the false discovery rate (FDR). Two recent manuscripts [arXiv:2502.19560, arXiv:2503.08944] engage with the topological gap protocol and its use in Phys. Rev. B 107, 245423 (2023) and Subsection S4.3 of the Supplementary Information for Nature 638, 651-655 (2025), although they do not explicitly dispute the main results of either one. We demonstrate that the objections in arXiv:2502.19560 and arXiv:2503.08944 are unfounded, and we uphold the conclusions of Phys. Rev. B 107, 245423 (2023) and Nature 638, 651-655 (2025). Specifically, we show that no flaws have been identified in our estimate of the false discovery rate (FDR). We provide a point-by-point rebuttal of the comments in arXiv:2502.19560 and arXiv:2503.08944.
△ Less
Submitted 17 April, 2025;
originally announced April 2025.
-
Roadmap to fault tolerant quantum computation using topological qubit arrays
Authors:
David Aasen,
Morteza Aghaee,
Zulfi Alam,
Mariusz Andrzejczuk,
Andrey Antipov,
Mikhail Astafev,
Lukas Avilovas,
Amin Barzegar,
Bela Bauer,
Jonathan Becker,
Juan M. Bello-Rivas,
Umesh Bhaskar,
Alex Bocharov,
Srini Boddapati,
David Bohn,
Jouri Bommer,
Parsa Bonderson,
Jan Borovsky,
Leo Bourdet,
Samuel Boutin,
Tom Brown,
Gary Campbell,
Lucas Casparis,
Srivatsa Chakravarthi,
Rui Chao
, et al. (157 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We describe a concrete device roadmap towards a fault-tolerant quantum computing architecture based on noise-resilient, topologically protected Majorana-based qubits. Our roadmap encompasses four generations of devices: a single-qubit device that enables a measurement-based qubit benchmarking protocol; a two-qubit device that uses measurement-based braiding to perform single-qubit Clifford operati…
▽ More
We describe a concrete device roadmap towards a fault-tolerant quantum computing architecture based on noise-resilient, topologically protected Majorana-based qubits. Our roadmap encompasses four generations of devices: a single-qubit device that enables a measurement-based qubit benchmarking protocol; a two-qubit device that uses measurement-based braiding to perform single-qubit Clifford operations; an eight-qubit device that can be used to show an improvement of a two-qubit operation when performed on logical qubits rather than directly on physical qubits; and a topological qubit array supporting lattice surgery demonstrations on two logical qubits. Devices that enable this path require a superconductor-semiconductor heterostructure that supports a topological phase, quantum dots and coupling between those quantum dots that can create the appropriate loops for interferometric measurements, and a microwave readout system that can perform fast, low-error single-shot measurements. We describe the key design components of these qubit devices, along with the associated protocols for demonstrations of single-qubit benchmarking, Clifford gate execution, quantum error detection, and quantum error correction, which differ greatly from those in more conventional qubits. Finally, we comment on implications and advantages of this architecture for utility-scale quantum computation.
△ Less
Submitted 7 April, 2025; v1 submitted 17 February, 2025;
originally announced February 2025.
-
Multimode optomechanical system in the quantum regime
Authors:
William H. P. Nielsen,
Yeghishe Tsaturyan,
Christoffer B. Møller,
Eugene S. Polzik,
Albert Schliesser
Abstract:
We realise a simple and robust optomechanical system with a multitude of long-lived ($Q>10^7$) mechanical modes in a phononic-bandgap shielded membrane resonator. An optical mode of a compact Fabry-Perot resonator detects these modes' motion with a measurement rate ($96~\mathrm{kHz}$) that exceeds the mechanical decoherence rates already at moderate cryogenic temperatures ($10\,\mathrm{K}$). Reach…
▽ More
We realise a simple and robust optomechanical system with a multitude of long-lived ($Q>10^7$) mechanical modes in a phononic-bandgap shielded membrane resonator. An optical mode of a compact Fabry-Perot resonator detects these modes' motion with a measurement rate ($96~\mathrm{kHz}$) that exceeds the mechanical decoherence rates already at moderate cryogenic temperatures ($10\,\mathrm{K}$). Reaching this quantum regime entails, i.~a., quantum measurement backaction exceeding thermal forces, and thus detectable optomechanical quantum correlations. In particular, we observe ponderomotive squeezing of the output light mediated by a multitude of mechanical resonator modes, with quantum noise suppression up to -2.4 dB (-3.6 dB if corrected for detection losses) and bandwidths $\lesssim 90\,\mathrm{ kHz}$. The multi-mode nature of the employed membrane and Fabry-Perot resonators lends itself to hybrid entanglement schemes involving multiple electromagnetic, mechanical, and spin degrees of freedom.
△ Less
Submitted 20 May, 2016;
originally announced May 2016.
