Showing 1–8 of 8 results for author: Lambare, J P

On the polemic assessment of what Bell did

Authors: Justo Pastor Lambare

Abstract: Despite their Nobel Prize-winning empirical falsification, the interpretation of the Bell inequality remains a subject of controversy. This article discusses and attempts to clarify the reasons John S. Bell and A. Einstein claimed that quantum entanglement implies puzzling nonlocal correlations that Einstein famously termed ``spooky action at a distance.'' The issue remains highly controversial an… ▽ More Despite their Nobel Prize-winning empirical falsification, the interpretation of the Bell inequality remains a subject of controversy. This article discusses and attempts to clarify the reasons John S. Bell and A. Einstein claimed that quantum entanglement implies puzzling nonlocal correlations that Einstein famously termed ``spooky action at a distance.'' The issue remains highly controversial and has roughly divided the scientific community into localists and nonlocalists. Without taking a stance for either side in the long-standing, polarized debate, we examine Bell's actual argument, highlighting the differences between his approach and the current orthodoxy. △ Less

Submitted 9 September, 2025; v1 submitted 28 June, 2025; originally announced June 2025.

Comments: Some paragraphs were clarified and a new reference was added

Comment on "Consequences of the single-pair measurement of the Bell parameter"

Authors: Justo Pastor Lambare

Abstract: In a recent article [Phys. Rev. A 111, 022204 (2025)], Genovese and Piacentini analyzed recent experiments measuring what they call "the entire Bell-CHSH parameter". They claimed those experiments may have implications for interpreting loophole-fee tests of the Bell-CHSH inequality. We explain that the Bell-CHSH inequality is not based on the entire Bell parameter, so these experiments are unrelat… ▽ More In a recent article [Phys. Rev. A 111, 022204 (2025)], Genovese and Piacentini analyzed recent experiments measuring what they call "the entire Bell-CHSH parameter". They claimed those experiments may have implications for interpreting loophole-fee tests of the Bell-CHSH inequality. We explain that the Bell-CHSH inequality is not based on the entire Bell parameter, so these experiments are unrelated to their empirical tests and cannot close eventual loopholes that still might persist. We point out that the physical meaning of these new experiments measuring the entire Bell parameter could be interpreted differently. △ Less

Submitted 14 April, 2025; originally announced April 2025.

Comments: Comment on arXiv:2409.02510

Commentary: Is the moon there if nobody looks -- Bell inequalities and physical reality

Authors: Richard D. Gill, Justo P. Lambare

Abstract: Marian Kupczynski(MK)is the author of a controversial paper published (2020) in the journal Frontiers in Physics. The work is built around a mathematical claim by MK which is actually false, and MK's logical reasoning around his claim is also incorrect. The same claim was made by him in several other recent papers published in other journals. A proof that the claimed result is false is the main co… ▽ More Marian Kupczynski(MK)is the author of a controversial paper published (2020) in the journal Frontiers in Physics. The work is built around a mathematical claim by MK which is actually false, and MK's logical reasoning around his claim is also incorrect. The same claim was made by him in several other recent papers published in other journals. A proof that the claimed result is false is the main content of our present "Comment". It is purely a mathematical counter-example to a mathematical claim in a number of MK's papers. △ Less

Submitted 16 January, 2023; v1 submitted 4 November, 2022; originally announced November 2022.

Comments: 4 pages. arXiv admin note: substantial text overlap with arXiv:2208.09930. The overlap is with a much longer preprint containing much extra material, and which the authors are submitting to another journal

Journal ref: Front. Phys., 09 December 2022, Sec. Statistical and Computational Physics

Kupczynski's Contextual Locally Causal Probabilistic Models are constrained by Bell's theorem

Authors: Richard D. Gill, Justo Pastor Lambare

Abstract: In a sequence of papers, Marian Kupczynski has argued that Bell's theorem can be circumvented if one takes correct account of contextual setting-dependent parameters describing measuring instruments. We show that this is not true. Despite first appearances, Kupczynksi's concept of a contextual locally causal probabilistic model is mathematically a special case of a Bell local hidden variables mode… ▽ More In a sequence of papers, Marian Kupczynski has argued that Bell's theorem can be circumvented if one takes correct account of contextual setting-dependent parameters describing measuring instruments. We show that this is not true. Despite first appearances, Kupczynksi's concept of a contextual locally causal probabilistic model is mathematically a special case of a Bell local hidden variables model. Thus, even if one takes account of contextuality in the way he suggests, the Bell-CHSH inequality can still be derived. Violation thereof by quantum mechanics cannot be easily explained away: quantum mechanics and local realism (including Kupczynski's claimed enlargement of the concept) are not compatible with one another. Further inspection shows that Kupczynski is actually falling back on the detection loophole. Since 2015, numerous loophole-free experiments have been performed, in which the Bell-CHSH inequality is violated, so despite any other possible imperfections of such experiments, Kupczynski's escape route for local realism is not available △ Less

Submitted 2 June, 2023; v1 submitted 21 August, 2022; originally announced August 2022.

Comments: Version 8. 15 pages. Final version for "Quantum reports"

Comment on "Nonlocality claims are inconsistent with Hilbert-space quantum mechanics"

Authors: Justo Pastor Lambare

Abstract: The view exists that the Bell inequality is a mere inconsistent application of classical concepts to a well-established quantum world. In the article, ``Nonlocality claims are inconsistent with Hilbert-space quantum mechanics'' [Phys. Rev. A, 101, 022117, (2020)], Robert B. Griffiths advocates for quantum theory's locality. Although R. B. Griffiths presents valuable insights in favor of quantum me… ▽ More The view exists that the Bell inequality is a mere inconsistent application of classical concepts to a well-established quantum world. In the article, ``Nonlocality claims are inconsistent with Hilbert-space quantum mechanics'' [Phys. Rev. A, 101, 022117, (2020)], Robert B. Griffiths advocates for quantum theory's locality. Although R. B. Griffiths presents valuable insights in favor of quantum mechanics' local character, he argues the Bell inequality is an inconsistent application of classical physics to quantum mechanics. We explain why a correct assessment of the Bell inequality does not in fact conflict with Griffiths's views of quantum locality and, on the contrary, it already contemplates them. Hence, Bell inequality inconsistency is not necessary for Griffiths's quantum locality to hold. △ Less

Submitted 28 October, 2021; v1 submitted 15 February, 2021; originally announced February 2021.

Comments: Currently under consideration by PRA

Journal ref: Phys. Rev. A, 104:066201, Dec 2021

A Note on Bell's Theorem Logical Consistency

Authors: Justo Pastor Lambare, Rodney Franco

Abstract: Counterfactual definiteness is supposed to underlie the Bell theorem. An old controversy exists among those who reject the theorem implications by rejecting counterfactual definiteness and those who claim that, since it is a direct consequence of locality, it cannot be independently rejected. We propose a different approach for solving this contentious issue by realizing that counterfactual defini… ▽ More Counterfactual definiteness is supposed to underlie the Bell theorem. An old controversy exists among those who reject the theorem implications by rejecting counterfactual definiteness and those who claim that, since it is a direct consequence of locality, it cannot be independently rejected. We propose a different approach for solving this contentious issue by realizing that counterfactual definiteness is an unnecessary and inconsistent assumption. Counterfactual definiteness is not equivalent to realism or determinism neither it follows from locality. It merely reduces to an incongruent application of counterfactual reasoning. Being incompatible with falsifiability, it constitutes an unjustified assumption that goes against the scientific method's rigor. Correct formulations of the Bell theorem's bases show it is absent either as a fundamental hypothesis or as a consequence of something else. Most importantly, we present a coherent Bell inequality derivation carefully devised to show explicitly and convincingly the absence of incompatible experiments or counterfactual reasoning. Thus, even admitting that counterfactual definiteness could be a consistent assumption, the necessary conclusion is that it is irrelevant for the inequality formulation and can be safely ignored when discussing Bell's inequality philosophical and physical implications. △ Less

Submitted 4 June, 2021; v1 submitted 16 December, 2020; originally announced December 2020.

Journal ref: Foundations of Physics (2021)

Comment on "A Loophole of All "Loophole-Free" Bell-Type Theorems"

Authors: Justo Pastor Lambare

Abstract: In a recent article (Found Sci (2020) https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-020-09666-0) Marek Czachor claims that the Bell inequality cannot be proved because variables of complementary measurements cannot be added or multiplied. Even though he has correctly identified the problems existing with the orthodox interpretation of the Bell inequality and dealt with them in an original way, the interpretation… ▽ More In a recent article (Found Sci (2020) https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-020-09666-0) Marek Czachor claims that the Bell inequality cannot be proved because variables of complementary measurements cannot be added or multiplied. Even though he has correctly identified the problems existing with the orthodox interpretation of the Bell inequality and dealt with them in an original way, the interpretation he addresses do not pertain to the original formulation given by John Stewart Bell. △ Less

Submitted 1 August, 2020; originally announced August 2020.

Comments: Foundations of Science (2020)

Journal ref: Foundations of Science (2020)

Bell inequalities, Counterfactual Definiteness and Falsifiability

Authors: Justo Pastor Lambare

Abstract: We formally prove the existence of an enduring incongruence pervading a widespread interpretation of the Bell inequality and explain how to rationally avoid it with a natural assumption justified by explicit reference to a mathematical property of Bell's probabilistic model. Although the amendment does not alter the relevance of the theorem regarding local realism, it brings back Bell theorem from… ▽ More We formally prove the existence of an enduring incongruence pervading a widespread interpretation of the Bell inequality and explain how to rationally avoid it with a natural assumption justified by explicit reference to a mathematical property of Bell's probabilistic model. Although the amendment does not alter the relevance of the theorem regarding local realism, it brings back Bell theorem from the realm of philosophical discussions about counterfactual conditionals to the concrete experimental arena. △ Less

Submitted 13 June, 2021; v1 submitted 31 October, 2019; originally announced November 2019.

Journal ref: International Journal of Quantum Information (2021)