Showing 1–6 of 6 results for author: Homer, S

Universal Quantum Circuits

Authors: Debajyoti Bera, Stephen Fenner, Frederic Green, Steve Homer

Abstract: We define and construct efficient depth-universal and almost-size-universal quantum circuits. Such circuits can be viewed as general-purpose simulators for central classes of quantum circuits and can be used to capture the computational power of the circuit class being simulated. For depth we construct universal circuits whose depth is the same order as the circuits being simulated. For size, th… ▽ More We define and construct efficient depth-universal and almost-size-universal quantum circuits. Such circuits can be viewed as general-purpose simulators for central classes of quantum circuits and can be used to capture the computational power of the circuit class being simulated. For depth we construct universal circuits whose depth is the same order as the circuits being simulated. For size, there is a log factor blow-up in the universal circuits constructed here. We prove that this construction is nearly optimal. △ Less

Submitted 15 April, 2008; originally announced April 2008.

Comments: 13 pages

Bounds on the Power of Constant-Depth Quantum Circuits

Authors: Stephen Fenner, Frederic Green, Steven Homer, Yong Zhang

Abstract: We show that if a language is recognized within certain error bounds by constant-depth quantum circuits over a finite family of gates, then it is computable in (classical) polynomial time. In particular, our results imply EQNC^0 is contained in P, where EQNC^0 is the constant-depth analog of the class EQP. On the other hand, we adapt and extend ideas of Terhal and DiVincenzo (quant-ph/0205133) t… ▽ More We show that if a language is recognized within certain error bounds by constant-depth quantum circuits over a finite family of gates, then it is computable in (classical) polynomial time. In particular, our results imply EQNC^0 is contained in P, where EQNC^0 is the constant-depth analog of the class EQP. On the other hand, we adapt and extend ideas of Terhal and DiVincenzo (quant-ph/0205133) to show that, for any family F of quantum gates including Hadamard and CNOT gates, computing the acceptance probabilities of depth-five circuits over F is just as hard as computing these probabilities for circuits over F. In particular, this implies that NQNC^0 = NQACC = NQP = coC=P where NQNC^0 is the constant-depth analog of the class NQP. This essentially refutes a conjecture of Green et al. that NQACC is contained in TC^0 (quant-ph/0106017). △ Less

Submitted 30 December, 2003; v1 submitted 28 December, 2003; originally announced December 2003.

Quantum Lower Bounds for Fanout

Authors: Maosen Fang, Stephen Fenner, Frederic Green, Steven Homer, Yong Zhang

Abstract: We prove several new lower bounds for constant depth quantum circuits. The main result is that parity (and hence fanout) requires log depth circuits, when the circuits are composed of single qubit and arbitrary size Toffoli gates, and when they use only constantly many ancillæ. Under this constraint, this bound is close to optimal. In the case of a non-constant number $a$ of ancillae, we give a… ▽ More We prove several new lower bounds for constant depth quantum circuits. The main result is that parity (and hence fanout) requires log depth circuits, when the circuits are composed of single qubit and arbitrary size Toffoli gates, and when they use only constantly many ancillæ. Under this constraint, this bound is close to optimal. In the case of a non-constant number $a$ of ancillae, we give a tradeoff between $a$ and the required depth, that results in a non-trivial lower bound for fanout when $a = n^{1-o(1)}$. △ Less

Submitted 28 December, 2003; originally announced December 2003.

Counting, Fanout, and the Complexity of Quantum ACC

Authors: Frederic Green, Steven Homer, Cristopher Moore, Christopher Pollett

Abstract: We propose definitions of $\QAC^0$, the quantum analog of the classical class $\AC^0$ of constant-depth circuits with AND and OR gates of arbitrary fan-in, and $\QACC[q]$, the analog of the class $\ACC[q]$ where $\Mod_q$ gates are also allowed. We prove that parity or fanout allows us to construct quantum $\MOD_q$ gates in constant depth for any $q$, so $\QACC[2] = \QACC$. More generally, we sho… ▽ More We propose definitions of $\QAC^0$, the quantum analog of the classical class $\AC^0$ of constant-depth circuits with AND and OR gates of arbitrary fan-in, and $\QACC[q]$, the analog of the class $\ACC[q]$ where $\Mod_q$ gates are also allowed. We prove that parity or fanout allows us to construct quantum $\MOD_q$ gates in constant depth for any $q$, so $\QACC[2] = \QACC$. More generally, we show that for any $q,p > 1$, $\MOD_q$ is equivalent to $\MOD_p$ (up to constant depth). This implies that $\QAC^0$ with unbounded fanout gates, denoted $\QACwf^0$, is the same as $\QACC[q]$ and $\QACC$ for all $q$. Since $\ACC[p] \ne \ACC[q]$ whenever $p$ and $q$ are distinct primes, $\QACC[q]$ is strictly more powerful than its classical counterpart, as is $\QAC^0$ when fanout is allowed. This adds to the growing list of quantum complexity classes which are provably more powerful than their classical counterparts. We also develop techniques for proving upper bounds for $\QACC^0$ in terms of related language classes. We define classes of languages $\EQACC$, $\NQACC$ and $\BQACC_{\rats}$. We define a notion of $\log$-planar $\QACC$ operators and show the appropriately restricted versions of $\EQACC$ and $\NQACC$ are contained in $¶/\poly$. We also define a notion of $\log$-gate restricted $\QACC$ operators and show the appropriately restricted versions of $\EQACC$ and $\NQACC$ are contained in $\TC^0$. △ Less

Submitted 4 June, 2001; originally announced June 2001.

On the Complexity of Quantum ACC

Authors: F. Green, S. Homer, C. Pollett

Abstract: For any $q > 1$, let $\MOD_q$ be a quantum gate that determines if the number of 1's in the input is divisible by $q$. We show that for any $q,t > 1$, $\MOD_q$ is equivalent to $\MOD_t$ (up to constant depth). Based on the case $q=2$, Moore \cite{moore99} has shown that quantum analogs of AC$^{(0)}$, ACC$[q]$, and ACC, denoted QAC$^{(0)}_{wf}$, QACC$[2]$, QACC respectively, define the same class… ▽ More For any $q > 1$, let $\MOD_q$ be a quantum gate that determines if the number of 1's in the input is divisible by $q$. We show that for any $q,t > 1$, $\MOD_q$ is equivalent to $\MOD_t$ (up to constant depth). Based on the case $q=2$, Moore \cite{moore99} has shown that quantum analogs of AC$^{(0)}$, ACC$[q]$, and ACC, denoted QAC$^{(0)}_{wf}$, QACC$[2]$, QACC respectively, define the same class of operators, leaving $q > 2$ as an open question. Our result resolves this question, proving that QAC$^{(0)}_{wf} =$ QACC$[q] = $ QACC for all $q$. We also develop techniques for proving upper bounds for QACC in terms of related language classes. We define classes of languages EQACC, NQACC and BQACC$_{\rats}$. We define a notion $\log$-planar QACC operators and show the appropriately restricted versions of EQACC and NQACC are contained in P/poly. We also define a notion of $\log$-gate restricted QACC operators and show the appropriately restricted versions of EQACC and NQACC are contained in TC$^{(0)}$. To do this last proof, we show that TC$^{(0)}$ can perform iterated addition and multiplication in certain field extensions. We also introduce the notion of a polynomial-size tensor graph and show that families of such graphs can encode the amplitudes resulting from apply an arbitrary QACC operator to an initial state. △ Less

Submitted 7 June, 2000; v1 submitted 21 February, 2000; originally announced February 2000.

Comments: 22 pages, 4 figures This version will appear in the July 2000 Computational Complexity conference. Section 4 has been significantly revised and many typos corrected

Report number: Boston University Technical Report #2000-003

Determining Acceptance Possibility for a Quantum Computation is Hard for the Polynomial Hierarchy

Authors: Stephen Fenner, Frederic Green, Steven Homer, Randall Pruim

Abstract: It is shown that determining whether a quantum computation has a non-zero probability of accepting is at least as hard as the polynomial time hierarchy. This hardness result also applies to determining in general whether a given quantum basis state appears with nonzero amplitude in a superposition, or whether a given quantum bit has positive expectation value at the end of a quantum computation.… ▽ More It is shown that determining whether a quantum computation has a non-zero probability of accepting is at least as hard as the polynomial time hierarchy. This hardness result also applies to determining in general whether a given quantum basis state appears with nonzero amplitude in a superposition, or whether a given quantum bit has positive expectation value at the end of a quantum computation. This result is achieved by showing that the complexity class NQP of Adleman, Demarrais, and Huang, a quantum analog of NP, is equal to the counting class coC$_=$P. △ Less

Submitted 18 December, 1998; originally announced December 1998.