-
Macroscopic non-contextuality as a principle for Almost Quantum Correlations
Authors:
Joe Henson,
Ana Belén Sainz
Abstract:
Quantum mechanics allows only certain sets of experimental results (or "probabilistic models") for Bell-type quantum non-locality experiments. A derivation of this set from simple physical or information theoretic principles would represent an important step forward in our understanding of quantum mechanics, and this problem has been intensely investigated in recent years. "Macroscopic locality,"…
▽ More
Quantum mechanics allows only certain sets of experimental results (or "probabilistic models") for Bell-type quantum non-locality experiments. A derivation of this set from simple physical or information theoretic principles would represent an important step forward in our understanding of quantum mechanics, and this problem has been intensely investigated in recent years. "Macroscopic locality," which requires the recovery of locality in the limit of large numbers of trials, is one of several principles discussed in the literature that place a bound on the set of quantum probabilistic models.
A similar question can also be asked about probabilistic models for the more general class of quantum contextuality experiments. Here, we extend the Macroscopic Locality principle to this more general setting, using the hypergraph approach of Acín, Fritz, Leverrier and Sainz [Comm. Math. Phys. 334(2), 533-628 (2015)], which provides a framework to study both phenomena of nonlocality and contextuality in a unified manner. We find that the set of probabilistic models allowed by our Macroscopic Non-Contextuality principle is equivalent to an important and previously studied set in this formalism, which is slightly larger than the quantum set. In the particular case of Bell Scenarios, this set is equivalent to the set of "Almost Quantum" models, which is of particular interest since the latter was recently shown to satisfy all but one of the principles that have been proposed to bound quantum probabilistic models, without being implied by any of them (or even their conjunction). Our condition is the first characterisation of the almost quantum set from a simple physical principle.
△ Less
Submitted 21 September, 2015; v1 submitted 24 January, 2015;
originally announced January 2015.
-
Bounding quantum contextuality with lack of third-order intereference
Authors:
Joe Henson
Abstract:
Recently many simple principles have been proposed that can explain quantum limitations on possible sets of experimental probabilities in nonlocality and contextuality experiments. However, few implications between these principles are known. Here it is shown that lack of irreducible third-order interference (a generalisation of the idea that no probabilistic interference remains unaccounted for o…
▽ More
Recently many simple principles have been proposed that can explain quantum limitations on possible sets of experimental probabilities in nonlocality and contextuality experiments. However, few implications between these principles are known. Here it is shown that lack of irreducible third-order interference (a generalisation of the idea that no probabilistic interference remains unaccounted for once we have taken into account interference between pairs of slits in a $n$-sit experiment) implies the principle known as the E principle or Consistent Exclusivity (that, if each pair of a set of experimental outcomes are exclusive alternatives in some measurement, then their probabilities are consistent with the existence of a further measurement in which they are all exclusive). This is a step towards a more unified understanding of quantum nonlocality and contextuality, which promises to allow derivations of important results from minimal, easily grasped assumptions. As one example, this result implies that lack of third order interference bounds violation of the CHSH-Bell inequality to 2.883.
△ Less
Submitted 1 May, 2015; v1 submitted 12 June, 2014;
originally announced June 2014.
-
Theory-independent limits on correlations from generalised Bayesian networks
Authors:
Joe Henson,
Raymond Lal,
Matthew F. Pusey
Abstract:
Bayesian networks provide a powerful tool for reasoning about probabilistic causation, used in many areas of science. They are, however, intrinsically classical. In particular, Bayesian networks naturally yield the Bell inequalities. Inspired by this connection, we generalise the formalism of classical Bayesian networks in order to investigate non-classical correlations in arbitrary causal structu…
▽ More
Bayesian networks provide a powerful tool for reasoning about probabilistic causation, used in many areas of science. They are, however, intrinsically classical. In particular, Bayesian networks naturally yield the Bell inequalities. Inspired by this connection, we generalise the formalism of classical Bayesian networks in order to investigate non-classical correlations in arbitrary causal structures. Our framework of `generalised Bayesian networks' replaces latent variables with the resources of any generalised probabilistic theory, most importantly quantum theory, but also, for example, Popescu-Rohrlich boxes. We obtain three main sets of results. Firstly, we prove that all of the observable conditional independences required by the classical theory also hold in our generalisation; to obtain this, we extend the classical $d$-separation theorem to our setting. Secondly, we find that the theory-independent constraints on probabilities can go beyond these conditional independences. For example we find that no probabilistic theory predicts perfect correlation between three parties using only bipartite common causes. Finally, we begin a classification of those causal structures, such as the Bell scenario, that may yield a separation between classical, quantum and general-probabilistic correlations.
△ Less
Submitted 1 December, 2014; v1 submitted 11 May, 2014;
originally announced May 2014.
-
A histories perspective on characterising quantum non-locality
Authors:
Fay Dowker,
Joe Henson,
Petros Wallden
Abstract:
We introduce a framework for studying non-locality and contextuality inspired by the path integral formulation of quantum theory. We prove that the existence of a strongly positive joint quantum measure -- the quantum analogue of a joint probability measure -- on a set of experimental probabilities implies the Navascues-Pironio-Acin (NPA) condition $Q^1$ and is implied by the stronger NPA conditio…
▽ More
We introduce a framework for studying non-locality and contextuality inspired by the path integral formulation of quantum theory. We prove that the existence of a strongly positive joint quantum measure -- the quantum analogue of a joint probability measure -- on a set of experimental probabilities implies the Navascues-Pironio-Acin (NPA) condition $Q^1$ and is implied by the stronger NPA condition $Q^{1+AB}$. A related condition is shown to be equivalent to $Q^{1+AB}$.
△ Less
Submitted 25 November, 2013;
originally announced November 2013.
-
Non-separability does not relieve the problem of Bell's theorem
Authors:
Joe Henson
Abstract:
This paper addresses arguments that "separability" is an assumption of Bell's theorem, and that abandoning this assumption in our interpretation of quantum mechanics (a position sometimes referred to as "holism") will allow us to restore a satisfying locality principle. Separability here means that all events associated to the union of some set of disjoint regions are combinations of events associ…
▽ More
This paper addresses arguments that "separability" is an assumption of Bell's theorem, and that abandoning this assumption in our interpretation of quantum mechanics (a position sometimes referred to as "holism") will allow us to restore a satisfying locality principle. Separability here means that all events associated to the union of some set of disjoint regions are combinations of events associated to each region taken separately.
In this article, it is shown that: (a) localised events can be consistently defined without implying separability; (b) the definition of Bell's locality condition does not rely on separability in any way; (c) the proof of Bell's theorem does not use separability as an assumption. If, inspired by considerations of non-separability, the assumptions of Bell's theorem are weakened, what remains no longer embodies the locality principle. Teller's argument for "relational holism" and Howard's arguments concerning separability are criticised in the light of these results. Howard's claim that Einstein grounded his arguments on the incompleteness of QM with a separability assumption is also challenged. Instead, Einstein is better interpreted as referring merely to the existence of localised events. Finally, it is argued that Bell rejected the idea that separability is an assumption of his theorem.
△ Less
Submitted 30 August, 2013; v1 submitted 28 February, 2013;
originally announced February 2013.
-
Quantum contextuality from a simple principle?
Authors:
Joe Henson
Abstract:
In a recent article entitled "A simple explanation of the quantum violation of a fundamental inequality," Cabello proposes a condition on a class of probabilistic models that, he claims, gives the same bound on contextuality for the KCBS inequality as quantum mechanics, and also rules out PR-box nonlocality. He conjectures that the condition will also reproduce quantum limits on contextuality in o…
▽ More
In a recent article entitled "A simple explanation of the quantum violation of a fundamental inequality," Cabello proposes a condition on a class of probabilistic models that, he claims, gives the same bound on contextuality for the KCBS inequality as quantum mechanics, and also rules out PR-box nonlocality. He conjectures that the condition will also reproduce quantum limits on contextuality in other scenarios. Here we show that the proposed principle is actually too weak to derive these results. Cabello has implicitly assumed in the proofs that if all pairs in a set of events are pairwise exclusive (so that their probabilities must sum to less than 1), the set can itself be considered exclusive. Perhaps surprisingly, this is not in general true in the general probabilistic framework under discussion. We call this hidden assumption "Consistent Exclusivity" or CE. With this extra assumption Cabello's proofs are sound. Furthermore, it is established that CE holds in quantum mechanics, providing a reasonable and simple new principle that may characterise quantum non-contextuality in many scenarios.
△ Less
Submitted 24 October, 2012; v1 submitted 22 October, 2012;
originally announced October 2012.
-
Confounding Causality Principles: comment on Rédei and san Pedro's "Distinguishing Causality Principles"
Authors:
Joe Henson
Abstract:
Rédei and san Pedro discuss my "Comparing Causality Principles," their main aim being to distinguish reasonable weakened versions of two causality principles presented there, "SO1" and "SO2". They also argue that the proof that SO1 implies SO2 contains a flaw. Here, a reply is made to a number of points raised in their paper. It is argued that the "intuition" that SO1 should be stronger than SO2 i…
▽ More
Rédei and san Pedro discuss my "Comparing Causality Principles," their main aim being to distinguish reasonable weakened versions of two causality principles presented there, "SO1" and "SO2". They also argue that the proof that SO1 implies SO2 contains a flaw. Here, a reply is made to a number of points raised in their paper. It is argued that the "intuition" that SO1 should be stronger than SO2 is implicitly based on a false premise. It is pointed out that a similar weakening of SO2 was already considered in the original paper. The technical definition of the new conditions is shown to be defective. The argument against the stronger versions of SO1 and SO2 given by Rédei and san Pedro is criticised. The flaw in the original proof is shown to be an easily corrected mistake in the wording. Finally, it is argued that some cited results on causal conditions in AQFT have little relevance to these issues, and are, in any case, highly problematic in themselves.
△ Less
Submitted 4 October, 2012;
originally announced October 2012.
-
Causality, Bell's theorem, and Ontic Definiteness
Authors:
Joe Henson
Abstract:
Bell's theorem shows that the reasonable relativistic causal principle known as "local causality" is not compatible with the predictions of quantum mechanics. It is not possible maintain a satisfying causal principle of this type while dropping any of the better-known assumptions of Bell's theorem. However, another assumption of Bell's theorem is the use of classical logic. One part of this assump…
▽ More
Bell's theorem shows that the reasonable relativistic causal principle known as "local causality" is not compatible with the predictions of quantum mechanics. It is not possible maintain a satisfying causal principle of this type while dropping any of the better-known assumptions of Bell's theorem. However, another assumption of Bell's theorem is the use of classical logic. One part of this assumption is the principle of "ontic definiteness", that is, that it must in principle be possible to assign definite truth values to all propositions treated in the theory. Once the logical setting is clarified somewhat, it can be seen that rejecting this principle does not in any way undermine the type of causal principle used by Bell. Without ontic definiteness, the deterministic causal condition known as Einstein Locality succeeds in banning superluminal influence (including signalling) whilst allowing correlations that violate Bell's inequalities. Objections to altering logic, and the consequences for operational and realistic viewpoints, are also addressed.
△ Less
Submitted 14 February, 2011;
originally announced February 2011.
-
A Bell Inequality Analog in Quantum Measure Theory
Authors:
David Craig,
Fay Dowker,
Joe Henson,
Seth Major,
David Rideout,
Rafael D. Sorkin
Abstract:
One obtains Bell's inequalities if one posits a hypothetical joint probability distribution, or {\it measure}, whose marginals yield the probabilities produced by the spin measurements in question. The existence of a joint measure is in turn equivalent to a certain causality condition known as ``screening off''. We show that if one assumes, more generally, a joint {\it quantal measure}, or ``dec…
▽ More
One obtains Bell's inequalities if one posits a hypothetical joint probability distribution, or {\it measure}, whose marginals yield the probabilities produced by the spin measurements in question. The existence of a joint measure is in turn equivalent to a certain causality condition known as ``screening off''. We show that if one assumes, more generally, a joint {\it quantal measure}, or ``decoherence functional'', one obtains instead an analogous inequality weaker by a factor of $\sqrt{2}$. The proof of this ``Tsirel'son inequality'' is geometrical and rests on the possibility of associating a Hilbert space to any strongly positive quantal measure. These results lead both to a {\it question}: ``Does a joint measure follow from some quantal analog of `screening off'?'', and to the {\it observation} that non-contextual hidden variables are viable in histories-based quantum mechanics, even if they are excluded classically.
△ Less
Submitted 11 December, 2006; v1 submitted 30 April, 2006;
originally announced May 2006.
-
Comparing causality principles
Authors:
Joe Henson
Abstract:
The principle of common cause is discussed as a possible fundamental principle of physics. Some revisions of Reichenbach's formulation of the principle are given, which lead to a version given by Bell. Various similar forms are compared and some equivalence results proved. The further problems of causality in a quantal system, and indeterministic causal structure, are addressed, with a view to d…
▽ More
The principle of common cause is discussed as a possible fundamental principle of physics. Some revisions of Reichenbach's formulation of the principle are given, which lead to a version given by Bell. Various similar forms are compared and some equivalence results proved. The further problems of causality in a quantal system, and indeterministic causal structure, are addressed, with a view to defining a causality principle applicable to quantum gravity.
△ Less
Submitted 28 November, 2005; v1 submitted 6 October, 2004;
originally announced October 2004.
-
A spontaneous collapse model on a lattice
Authors:
Fay Dowker,
Joe Henson
Abstract:
We present a spontaneous collapse model of a field theory on a 1+1 null lattice, in which the causal structure of the lattice plays a central role. Issues such as ``locality,'' ``non-locality'' and superluminal signaling are addressed in the context of the model which has the virtue of extreme simplicity. The formalism of the model is related to that of the consistent histories approach to quant…
▽ More
We present a spontaneous collapse model of a field theory on a 1+1 null lattice, in which the causal structure of the lattice plays a central role. Issues such as ``locality,'' ``non-locality'' and superluminal signaling are addressed in the context of the model which has the virtue of extreme simplicity. The formalism of the model is related to that of the consistent histories approach to quantum mechanics.
△ Less
Submitted 26 July, 2004; v1 submitted 6 September, 2002;
originally announced September 2002.
