Showing 1–2 of 2 results for author: Healey, R A

Quantum Theory and the Limits of Objectivity

Authors: Richard A. Healey

Abstract: Three recent arguments seek to show that the universal applicability of unitary quantum theory is inconsistent with the assumption that a well-conducted measurement always has a definite physical outcome. In this paper I restate and analyze these arguments. The import of the first two is diminished by their dependence on assumptions about the outcomes of counterfactual measurements. But the third… ▽ More Three recent arguments seek to show that the universal applicability of unitary quantum theory is inconsistent with the assumption that a well-conducted measurement always has a definite physical outcome. In this paper I restate and analyze these arguments. The import of the first two is diminished by their dependence on assumptions about the outcomes of counterfactual measurements. But the third argument establishes its intended conclusion. Even if every well-conducted quantum measurement we ever make will have a definite physical outcome, this argument should make us reconsider the objectivity of that outcome. △ Less

Submitted 12 September, 2018; v1 submitted 1 July, 2018; originally announced July 2018.

Comments: 1 figure forthcoming in Foundations of Physics

Local Causality, Probability and Explanation

Authors: Richard A. Healey

Abstract: In papers published in the 25 years following his famous 1964 proof John Bell refined and reformulated his views on locality and causality. Although his formulations of local causality were in terms of probability, he had little to say about that notion. But assumptions about probability are implicit in his arguments and conclusions. Probability does not conform to these assumptions when quantum m… ▽ More In papers published in the 25 years following his famous 1964 proof John Bell refined and reformulated his views on locality and causality. Although his formulations of local causality were in terms of probability, he had little to say about that notion. But assumptions about probability are implicit in his arguments and conclusions. Probability does not conform to these assumptions when quantum mechanics is applied to account for the particular correlations Bell argues are locally inexplicable. This account involves no superluminal action and there is even a sense in which it is local, but it is in tension with the requirement that the direct causes and effects of events are nearby. △ Less

Submitted 7 January, 2016; v1 submitted 1 January, 2016; originally announced January 2016.

Comments: Forthcoming in Shan Gao and Mary Bell (eds.) Quantum Nonlocality and Reality -- 50 Years of Bell's Theorem (Cambridge University Press). 5 figures