A strong loophole-free test of local realism
Authors:
Lynden K. Shalm,
Evan Meyer-Scott,
Bradley G. Christensen,
Peter Bierhorst,
Michael A. Wayne,
Martin J. Stevens,
Thomas Gerrits,
Scott Glancy,
Deny R. Hamel,
Michael S. Allman,
Kevin J. Coakley,
Shellee D. Dyer,
Carson Hodge,
Adriana E. Lita,
Varun B. Verma,
Camilla Lambrocco,
Edward Tortorici,
Alan L. Migdall,
Yanbao Zhang,
Daniel R. Kumor,
William H. Farr,
Francesco Marsili,
Matthew D. Shaw,
Jeffrey A. Stern,
Carlos Abellán
, et al. (9 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We present a loophole-free violation of local realism using entangled photon pairs. We ensure that all relevant events in our Bell test are spacelike separated by placing the parties far enough apart and by using fast random number generators and high-speed polarization measurements. A high-quality polarization-entangled source of photons, combined with high-efficiency, low-noise, single-photon de…
▽ More
We present a loophole-free violation of local realism using entangled photon pairs. We ensure that all relevant events in our Bell test are spacelike separated by placing the parties far enough apart and by using fast random number generators and high-speed polarization measurements. A high-quality polarization-entangled source of photons, combined with high-efficiency, low-noise, single-photon detectors, allows us to make measurements without requiring any fair-sampling assumptions. Using a hypothesis test, we compute p-values as small as $5.9\times 10^{-9}$ for our Bell violation while maintaining the spacelike separation of our events. We estimate the degree to which a local realistic system could predict our measurement choices. Accounting for this predictability, our smallest adjusted p-value is $2.3 \times 10^{-7}$. We therefore reject the hypothesis that local realism governs our experiment.
△ Less
Submitted 6 September, 2016; v1 submitted 10 November, 2015;
originally announced November 2015.
