-
Essentiality of the Non-stoquastic Hamiltonians and Driver Graph Design in Quantum Optimization Annealing
Authors:
Vicky Choi
Abstract:
One of the distinct features of quantum mechanics is that the probability amplitude can have both positive and negative signs, which has no classical counterpart as the classical probability must be positive. Consequently, one possible way to achieve quantum speedup is to explicitly harness this feature. Unlike a stoquastic Hamiltonian whose ground state has only positive amplitudes (with respect…
▽ More
One of the distinct features of quantum mechanics is that the probability amplitude can have both positive and negative signs, which has no classical counterpart as the classical probability must be positive. Consequently, one possible way to achieve quantum speedup is to explicitly harness this feature. Unlike a stoquastic Hamiltonian whose ground state has only positive amplitudes (with respect to the computational basis), a non-stoquastic Hamiltonian can be eventually stoquastic or properly non-stoquastic when its ground state has both positive and negative amplitudes. In this paper, we describe that, for some hard instances which are characterized by the presence of an anti-crossing (AC) in a transverse-field quantum annealing (QA) algorithm, how to design an appropriate XX-driver graph (without knowing the prior problem structure) with an appropriate XX-coupler strength such that the resulting non-stoquastic QA algorithm is proper-non-stoquastic with two bridged anti-crossings (a double-AC) where the spectral gap between the first and second level is large enough such that the system can be operated diabatically in polynomial time. The speedup is exponential in the original AC-distance, which can be sub-exponential or exponential in the system size, over the stoquastic QA algorithm, and possibly the same order of speedup over the state-of-the-art classical algorithms in optimization. This work is developed based on the novel characterizations of a modified and generalized parametrization definition of an anti-crossing in the context of quantum optimization annealing introduced in [4].
△ Less
Submitted 26 April, 2022; v1 submitted 5 May, 2021;
originally announced May 2021.
-
The Effects of the Problem Hamiltonian Parameters on the Minimum Spectral Gap in Adiabatic Quantum Optimization
Authors:
Vicky Choi
Abstract:
We study the relation between the Ising problem Hamiltonian parameters and the minimum spectral gap (min-gap) of the system Hamiltonian in the Ising-based quantum annealer. The main argument we use in this paper to assess the performance of a QA algorithm is the presence or absence of an anti-crossing during quantum evolution. For this purpose, we introduce a new parametrization definition of the…
▽ More
We study the relation between the Ising problem Hamiltonian parameters and the minimum spectral gap (min-gap) of the system Hamiltonian in the Ising-based quantum annealer. The main argument we use in this paper to assess the performance of a QA algorithm is the presence or absence of an anti-crossing during quantum evolution. For this purpose, we introduce a new parametrization definition of the anti-crossing. Using the Maximum-weighted Independent Set (MIS) problem in which there are flexible parameters (energy penalties J between pairs of edges) in an Ising formulation as the model problem, we construct examples to show that by changing the value of J, we can change the quantum evolution from one that has an anti-crossing (that results in an exponential small min-gap) to one that does not have, or the other way around, and thus drastically change (increase or decrease) the min-gap. However, we also show that by changing the value of $J$ alone, one can not avoid the anti-crossing. We recall a polynomial reduction from an Ising problem to an MIS problem to show that the flexibility of changing parameters without changing the problem to be solved can be applied to any Ising problem. As an example, we show that by such a reduction alone, it is possible to remove the anti-crossing and thus increase the min-gap. Our anti-crossing definition is necessarily scaling invariant as scaling the problem Hamiltonian does not change the nature (i.e. presence or absence) of an anti-crossing. As a side note, we show exactly how the min-gap is scaled if we scale the problem Hamiltonian by a constant factor.
△ Less
Submitted 5 November, 2019; v1 submitted 7 October, 2019;
originally announced October 2019.
-
Different Adiabatic Quantum Optimization Algorithms for the NP-Complete Exact Cover and 3SAT Problems
Authors:
Vicky Choi
Abstract:
One of the most important questions in studying quantum computation is: whether a quantum computer can solve NP-complete problems more efficiently than a classical computer? In 2000, Farhi, et al. (Science, 292(5516):472--476, 2001) proposed the adiabatic quantum optimization (AQO), a paradigm that directly attacks NP-hard optimization problems. How powerful is AQO? Early on, van Dam and Vazirani…
▽ More
One of the most important questions in studying quantum computation is: whether a quantum computer can solve NP-complete problems more efficiently than a classical computer? In 2000, Farhi, et al. (Science, 292(5516):472--476, 2001) proposed the adiabatic quantum optimization (AQO), a paradigm that directly attacks NP-hard optimization problems. How powerful is AQO? Early on, van Dam and Vazirani claimed that AQO failed (i.e. would take exponential time) for a family of 3SAT instances they constructed. More recently, Altshuler, et al. (Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 107(28): 12446--12450, 2010) claimed that AQO failed also for random instances of the NP-complete Exact Cover problem. In this paper, we make clear that all these negative results are only for a specific AQO algorithm. We do so by demonstrating different AQO algorithms for the same problem for which their arguments no longer hold. Whether AQO fails or succeeds for solving the NP-complete problems (either the worst case or the average case) requires further investigation. Our AQO algorithms for Exact Cover and 3SAT are based on the polynomial reductions to the NP-complete Maximum-weight Independent Set (MIS) problem.
△ Less
Submitted 31 May, 2011; v1 submitted 6 October, 2010;
originally announced October 2010.
-
Avoid First Order Quantum Phase Transition by Changing Problem Hamiltonians
Authors:
Vicky Choi
Abstract:
In Amin and Choi \cite{AC09}, we show that an adiabatic quantum algorithm for the NP-hard maximum independent set (MIS) problem on a set of special family of graphs in which there are exponentially many local maxima would have the exponentially small minimum spectral gap and thus would require the exponential time, due to the first order quantum phase transition (FQPT). The problem Hamiltonian of…
▽ More
In Amin and Choi \cite{AC09}, we show that an adiabatic quantum algorithm for the NP-hard maximum independent set (MIS) problem on a set of special family of graphs in which there are exponentially many local maxima would have the exponentially small minimum spectral gap and thus would require the exponential time, due to the first order quantum phase transition (FQPT). The problem Hamiltonian of the adiabatic quantum algorithm for MIS is based on the reduction to the Ising problem and has flexible parameters. In this paper, we show numerically on the 15-vertex graph that by choosing the parameters appropriately in the problem Hamiltonian (without changing the problem to be solved) for MIS, we can prevent the FQPT and drastically increase the minimum spectral gap. The result is further supported by visualization from the Decomposed State Evolution Visualization (\desev) --- a visualization tool we introduced. Furthermore, our result also serves to concretely clarify that it is not sufficient to consider one specific problem Hamiltonian for proving the failure of adiabatic quantum optimization for a problem. We also raise the basic question about what the appropriate formulation of adiabatic running time should be.
△ Less
Submitted 2 August, 2011; v1 submitted 6 October, 2010;
originally announced October 2010.
-
Adiabatic Quantum Algorithms for the NP-Complete Maximum-Weight Independent Set, Exact Cover and 3SAT Problems
Authors:
Vicky Choi
Abstract:
The problem Hamiltonian of the adiabatic quantum algorithm for the maximum-weight independent set problem (MIS) that is based on the reduction to the Ising problem (as described in [Choi08]) has flexible parameters. We show that by choosing the parameters appropriately in the problem Hamiltonian (without changing the problem to be solved) for MIS on CK graphs, we can prevent the first order quant…
▽ More
The problem Hamiltonian of the adiabatic quantum algorithm for the maximum-weight independent set problem (MIS) that is based on the reduction to the Ising problem (as described in [Choi08]) has flexible parameters. We show that by choosing the parameters appropriately in the problem Hamiltonian (without changing the problem to be solved) for MIS on CK graphs, we can prevent the first order quantum phase transition and significantly change the minimum spectral gap. We raise the basic question about what the appropriate formulation of adiabatic running time should be. We also describe adiabatic quantum algorithms for Exact Cover and 3SAT in which the problem Hamiltonians are based on the reduction to MIS. We point out that the argument in Altshuler et al.(arXiv:0908.2782 [quant-ph]) that their adiabatic quantum algorithm failed with high probability for randomly generated instances of Exact Cover does not carry over to this new algorithm.
△ Less
Submitted 13 April, 2010;
originally announced April 2010.
-
Minor-embedding in adiabatic quantum computation: II. Minor-universal graph design
Authors:
Vicky Choi
Abstract:
In [Choi08], we introduced the notion of minor-embedding in adiabatic quantum optimization. A minor-embedding of a graph G in a quantum hardware graph U is a subgraph of U such that G can be obtained from it by contracting edges. In this paper, we describe the intertwined adiabatic quantum architecture design problem, which is to construct a hardware graph U that satisfies all known physical con…
▽ More
In [Choi08], we introduced the notion of minor-embedding in adiabatic quantum optimization. A minor-embedding of a graph G in a quantum hardware graph U is a subgraph of U such that G can be obtained from it by contracting edges. In this paper, we describe the intertwined adiabatic quantum architecture design problem, which is to construct a hardware graph U that satisfies all known physical constraints and, at the same time, permits an efficient minor-embedding algorithm. We illustrate an optimal complete-graph-minor hardware graph. Given a family F of graphs, a (host) graph U is called F-minor-universal if for each graph G in F, U contains a minor-embedding of G. The problem for designing a F-minor-universal hardware graph U_{sparse} in which F consists of a family of sparse graphs (e.g., bounded degree graphs) is open.
△ Less
Submitted 18 January, 2010; v1 submitted 18 January, 2010;
originally announced January 2010.
-
First Order Quantum Phase Transition in Adiabatic Quantum Computation
Authors:
M. H. S. Amin,
V. Choi
Abstract:
We investigate the connection between local minima in the problem Hamiltonian and first order quantum phase transitions during an adiabatic quantum computation. We demonstrate how some properties of the local minima can lead to an extremely small gap that is exponentially sensitive to the Hamiltonian parameters. Using perturbation expansion, we derive an analytical formula that can not only pred…
▽ More
We investigate the connection between local minima in the problem Hamiltonian and first order quantum phase transitions during an adiabatic quantum computation. We demonstrate how some properties of the local minima can lead to an extremely small gap that is exponentially sensitive to the Hamiltonian parameters. Using perturbation expansion, we derive an analytical formula that can not only predict the behavior of the gap, but also provide insight on how to controllably vary the gap size by changing the parameters. We show agreement with numerical calculations for a weighted maximum independent set problem instance.
△ Less
Submitted 15 December, 2009; v1 submitted 8 April, 2009;
originally announced April 2009.
-
Landau-Zener Transitions in an Adiabatic Quantum Computer
Authors:
J. Johansson,
M. H. S. Amin,
A. J. Berkley,
P. Bunyk,
V. Choi,
R. Harris,
M. W. Johnson,
T. M. Lanting,
Seth Lloyd,
G. Rose
Abstract:
We report an experimental measurement of Landau-Zener transitions on an individual flux qubit within a multi-qubit superconducting chip designed for adiabatic quantum computation. The method used isolates a single qubit, tunes its tunneling amplitude Delta into the limit where Delta is much less than both the temperature T and the decoherence-induced energy level broadening, and forces it to und…
▽ More
We report an experimental measurement of Landau-Zener transitions on an individual flux qubit within a multi-qubit superconducting chip designed for adiabatic quantum computation. The method used isolates a single qubit, tunes its tunneling amplitude Delta into the limit where Delta is much less than both the temperature T and the decoherence-induced energy level broadening, and forces it to undergo a Landau-Zener transition. We find that the behavior of the qubit agrees to a high degree of accuracy with theoretical predictions for Landau-Zener transition probabilities for a double-well quantum system coupled to 1/f magnetic flux noise.
△ Less
Submitted 4 July, 2008;
originally announced July 2008.
-
Minor-Embedding in Adiabatic Quantum Computation: I. The Parameter Setting Problem
Authors:
Vicky Choi
Abstract:
We show that the NP-hard quadratic unconstrained binary optimization (QUBO) problem on a graph $G$ can be solved using an adiabatic quantum computer that implements an Ising spin-1/2 Hamiltonian, by reduction through minor-embedding of $G$ in the quantum hardware graph $U$. There are two components to this reduction: embedding and parameter setting. The embedding problem is to find a minor-embed…
▽ More
We show that the NP-hard quadratic unconstrained binary optimization (QUBO) problem on a graph $G$ can be solved using an adiabatic quantum computer that implements an Ising spin-1/2 Hamiltonian, by reduction through minor-embedding of $G$ in the quantum hardware graph $U$. There are two components to this reduction: embedding and parameter setting. The embedding problem is to find a minor-embedding $G^{emb}$ of a graph $G$ in $U$, which is a subgraph of $U$ such that $G$ can be obtained from $G^{emb}$ by contracting edges. The parameter setting problem is to determine the corresponding parameters, qubit biases and coupler strengths, of the embedded Ising Hamiltonian. In this paper, we focus on the parameter setting problem. As an example, we demonstrate the embedded Ising Hamiltonian for solving the maximum independent set (MIS) problem via adiabatic quantum computation (AQC) using an Ising spin-1/2 system. We close by discussing several related algorithmic problems that need to be investigated in order to facilitate the design of adiabatic algorithms and AQC architectures.
△ Less
Submitted 30 April, 2008;
originally announced April 2008.
