-
Modeling phonon-mediated quasiparticle poisoning in superconducting qubit arrays
Authors:
Eric Yelton,
Clayton P. Larson,
Vito Iaia,
Kenneth Dodge,
Guglielmo La Magna,
Paul G. Baity,
Ivan V. Pechenezhskiy,
Robert McDermott,
Noah Kurinsky,
Gianluigi Catelani,
Britton L. T. Plourde
Abstract:
Correlated errors caused by ionizing radiation impacting superconducting qubit chips are problematic for quantum error correction. Such impacts generate quasiparticle (QP) excitations in the qubit electrodes, which temporarily reduce qubit coherence significantly. The many energetic phonons produced by a particle impact travel efficiently throughout the device substrate and generate quasiparticles…
▽ More
Correlated errors caused by ionizing radiation impacting superconducting qubit chips are problematic for quantum error correction. Such impacts generate quasiparticle (QP) excitations in the qubit electrodes, which temporarily reduce qubit coherence significantly. The many energetic phonons produced by a particle impact travel efficiently throughout the device substrate and generate quasiparticles with high probability, thus causing errors on a large fraction of the qubits in an array simultaneously. We describe a comprehensive strategy for the numerical simulation of the phonon and quasiparticle dynamics in the aftermath of an impact. We compare the simulations with experimental measurements of phonon-mediated QP poisoning and demonstrate that our modeling captures the spatial and temporal footprint of the QP poisoning for various configurations of phonon downconversion structures. We thus present a path forward for the operation of superconducting quantum processors in the presence of ionizing radiation.
△ Less
Submitted 2 August, 2024; v1 submitted 23 February, 2024;
originally announced February 2024.
-
Circle fit optimization for resonator quality factor measurements: point redistribution for maximal accuracy
Authors:
Paul G. Baity,
Connor Maclean,
Valentino Seferai,
Joe Bronstein,
Yi Shu,
Tania Hemakumara,
Martin Weides
Abstract:
The control of material loss mechanisms is playing an increasingly important role for improving coherence times of superconducting quantum devices. Such material losses can be characterized through the measurement of planar superconducting resonators, which reflect losses through the resonance's quality factor $Q_l$. The resonance quality factor consists of both internal (material) losses as well…
▽ More
The control of material loss mechanisms is playing an increasingly important role for improving coherence times of superconducting quantum devices. Such material losses can be characterized through the measurement of planar superconducting resonators, which reflect losses through the resonance's quality factor $Q_l$. The resonance quality factor consists of both internal (material) losses as well as coupling losses when resonance photons escape back into the measurement circuit. The combined losses are then described as $Q_l^{-1} = \mathrm{Re}\{Q_c^{-1}\} + Q_i^{-1}$, where $Q_c$ and $Q_i$ reflect the coupling and internal quality factors of the resonator, respectively. To separate the relative contributions of $Q_i$ and $Q_c$ to $Q_l$, diameter-correcting circle fits use algebraic or geometric means to fit the resonance signal on the complex plane. However, such circle fits can produce varied results, so to address this issue, we use a combination of simulation and experiment to determine the reliability of a fitting algorithm across a wide range of quality factor values from $Q_i\ll Q_c$ to $Q_c\ll Q_i$. In addition, we develop a novel measurement protocol that can not only reduce fitting errors by factors $\gtrsim 2$ but also mitigates the influence of the measurement background on the fit results. This technique can be generalized for other resonance systems beyond superconducting resonators.
△ Less
Submitted 24 November, 2023; v1 submitted 16 January, 2023;
originally announced January 2023.
-
Quantum computing hardware in the cloud: Should a computational chemist care?
Authors:
A. Rossi,
P. G. Baity,
V. M. Schäfer,
M. Weides
Abstract:
Within the last decade much progress has been made in the experimental realisation of quantum computing hardware based on a variety of physical systems. Rapid progress has been fuelled by the conviction that sufficiently powerful quantum machines will herald enormous computational advantages in many fields, including chemical research. A quantum computer capable of simulating the electronic struct…
▽ More
Within the last decade much progress has been made in the experimental realisation of quantum computing hardware based on a variety of physical systems. Rapid progress has been fuelled by the conviction that sufficiently powerful quantum machines will herald enormous computational advantages in many fields, including chemical research. A quantum computer capable of simulating the electronic structures of complex molecules would be a game changer for the design of new drugs and materials. Given the potential implications of this technology, there is a need within the chemistry community to keep abreast with the latest developments as well as becoming involved in experimentation with quantum prototypes. To facilitate this, here we review the types of quantum computing hardware that have been made available to the public through cloud services. We focus on three architectures, namely superconductors, trapped ions and semiconductors. For each one we summarise the basic physical operations, requirements and performance. We discuss to what extent each system has been used for molecular chemistry problems and highlight the most pressing hardware issues to be solved for a chemistry-relevant quantum advantage to eventually emerge.
△ Less
Submitted 31 May, 2021; v1 submitted 5 February, 2021;
originally announced February 2021.
