-
Trading Under Uncertainty: A Distribution-Based Strategy for Futures Markets Using FutureQuant Transformer
Authors:
Wenhao Guo,
Yuda Wang,
Zeqiao Huang,
Changjiang Zhang,
Shumin ma
Abstract:
In the complex landscape of traditional futures trading, where vast data and variables like real-time Limit Order Books (LOB) complicate price predictions, we introduce the FutureQuant Transformer model, leveraging attention mechanisms to navigate these challenges. Unlike conventional models focused on point predictions, the FutureQuant model excels in forecasting the range and volatility of futur…
▽ More
In the complex landscape of traditional futures trading, where vast data and variables like real-time Limit Order Books (LOB) complicate price predictions, we introduce the FutureQuant Transformer model, leveraging attention mechanisms to navigate these challenges. Unlike conventional models focused on point predictions, the FutureQuant model excels in forecasting the range and volatility of future prices, thus offering richer insights for trading strategies. Its ability to parse and learn from intricate market patterns allows for enhanced decision-making, significantly improving risk management and achieving a notable average gain of 0.1193% per 30-minute trade over state-of-the-art models with a simple algorithm using factors such as RSI, ATR, and Bollinger Bands. This innovation marks a substantial leap forward in predictive analytics within the volatile domain of futures trading.
△ Less
Submitted 8 May, 2025;
originally announced May 2025.
-
Deep into The Domain Shift: Transfer Learning through Dependence Regularization
Authors:
Shumin Ma,
Zhiri Yuan,
Qi Wu,
Yiyan Huang,
Xixu Hu,
Cheuk Hang Leung,
Dongdong Wang,
Zhixiang Huang
Abstract:
Classical Domain Adaptation methods acquire transferability by regularizing the overall distributional discrepancies between features in the source domain (labeled) and features in the target domain (unlabeled). They often do not differentiate whether the domain differences come from the marginals or the dependence structures. In many business and financial applications, the labeling function usua…
▽ More
Classical Domain Adaptation methods acquire transferability by regularizing the overall distributional discrepancies between features in the source domain (labeled) and features in the target domain (unlabeled). They often do not differentiate whether the domain differences come from the marginals or the dependence structures. In many business and financial applications, the labeling function usually has different sensitivities to the changes in the marginals versus changes in the dependence structures. Measuring the overall distributional differences will not be discriminative enough in acquiring transferability. Without the needed structural resolution, the learned transfer is less optimal. This paper proposes a new domain adaptation approach in which one can measure the differences in the internal dependence structure separately from those in the marginals. By optimizing the relative weights among them, the new regularization strategy greatly relaxes the rigidness of the existing approaches. It allows a learning machine to pay special attention to places where the differences matter the most. Experiments on three real-world datasets show that the improvements are quite notable and robust compared to various benchmark domain adaptation models.
△ Less
Submitted 30 May, 2023;
originally announced May 2023.
-
Robust Causal Learning for the Estimation of Average Treatment Effects
Authors:
Yiyan Huang,
Cheuk Hang Leung,
Xing Yan,
Qi Wu,
Shumin Ma,
Zhiri Yuan,
Dongdong Wang,
Zhixiang Huang
Abstract:
Many practical decision-making problems in economics and healthcare seek to estimate the average treatment effect (ATE) from observational data. The Double/Debiased Machine Learning (DML) is one of the prevalent methods to estimate ATE in the observational study. However, the DML estimators can suffer an error-compounding issue and even give an extreme estimate when the propensity scores are missp…
▽ More
Many practical decision-making problems in economics and healthcare seek to estimate the average treatment effect (ATE) from observational data. The Double/Debiased Machine Learning (DML) is one of the prevalent methods to estimate ATE in the observational study. However, the DML estimators can suffer an error-compounding issue and even give an extreme estimate when the propensity scores are misspecified or very close to 0 or 1. Previous studies have overcome this issue through some empirical tricks such as propensity score trimming, yet none of the existing literature solves this problem from a theoretical standpoint. In this paper, we propose a Robust Causal Learning (RCL) method to offset the deficiencies of the DML estimators. Theoretically, the RCL estimators i) are as consistent and doubly robust as the DML estimators, and ii) can get rid of the error-compounding issue. Empirically, the comprehensive experiments show that i) the RCL estimators give more stable estimations of the causal parameters than the DML estimators, and ii) the RCL estimators outperform the traditional estimators and their variants when applying different machine learning models on both simulation and benchmark datasets.
△ Less
Submitted 5 September, 2022;
originally announced September 2022.
-
Factor Representation and Decision Making in Stock Markets Using Deep Reinforcement Learning
Authors:
Zhaolu Dong,
Shan Huang,
Simiao Ma,
Yining Qian
Abstract:
Deep Reinforcement learning is a branch of unsupervised learning in which an agent learns to act based on environment state in order to maximize its total reward. Deep reinforcement learning provides good opportunity to model the complexity of portfolio choice in high-dimensional and data-driven environment by leveraging the powerful representation of deep neural networks. In this paper, we build…
▽ More
Deep Reinforcement learning is a branch of unsupervised learning in which an agent learns to act based on environment state in order to maximize its total reward. Deep reinforcement learning provides good opportunity to model the complexity of portfolio choice in high-dimensional and data-driven environment by leveraging the powerful representation of deep neural networks. In this paper, we build a portfolio management system using direct deep reinforcement learning to make optimal portfolio choice periodically among S\&P500 underlying stocks by learning a good factor representation (as input). The result shows that an effective learning of market conditions and optimal portfolio allocations can significantly outperform the average market.
△ Less
Submitted 3 August, 2021;
originally announced August 2021.
-
Predicting Daily Trading Volume via Various Hidden States
Authors:
Shaojun Ma,
Pengcheng Li
Abstract:
Predicting intraday trading volume plays an important role in trading alpha research. Existing methods such as rolling means(RM) and a two-states based Kalman Filtering method have been presented in this topic. We extend two states into various states in Kalman Filter framework to improve the accuracy of prediction. Specifically, for different stocks we utilize cross validation and determine best…
▽ More
Predicting intraday trading volume plays an important role in trading alpha research. Existing methods such as rolling means(RM) and a two-states based Kalman Filtering method have been presented in this topic. We extend two states into various states in Kalman Filter framework to improve the accuracy of prediction. Specifically, for different stocks we utilize cross validation and determine best states number by minimizing mean squared error of the trading volume. We demonstrate the effectivity of our method through a series of comparison experiments and numerical analysis.
△ Less
Submitted 15 July, 2021;
originally announced July 2021.
-
Understanding Distributional Ambiguity via Non-robust Chance Constraint
Authors:
Qi Wu,
Shumin Ma,
Cheuk Hang Leung,
Wei Liu,
Nanbo Peng
Abstract:
This paper provides a non-robust interpretation of the distributionally robust optimization (DRO) problem by relating the distributional uncertainties to the chance probabilities. Our analysis allows a decision-maker to interpret the size of the ambiguity set, which is often lack of business meaning, through the chance parameters constraining the objective function. We first show that, for general…
▽ More
This paper provides a non-robust interpretation of the distributionally robust optimization (DRO) problem by relating the distributional uncertainties to the chance probabilities. Our analysis allows a decision-maker to interpret the size of the ambiguity set, which is often lack of business meaning, through the chance parameters constraining the objective function. We first show that, for general $φ$-divergences, a DRO problem is asymptotically equivalent to a class of mean-deviation problems. These mean-deviation problems are not subject to uncertain distributions, and the ambiguity radius in the original DRO problem now plays the role of controlling the risk preference of the decision-maker. We then demonstrate that a DRO problem can be cast as a chance-constrained optimization (CCO) problem when a boundedness constraint is added to the decision variables. Without the boundedness constraint, the CCO problem is shown to perform uniformly better than the DRO problem, irrespective of the radius of the ambiguity set, the choice of the divergence measure, or the tail heaviness of the center distribution. Thanks to our high-order expansion result, a notable feature of our analysis is that it applies to divergence measures that accommodate well heavy tail distributions such as the student $t$-distribution and the lognormal distribution, besides the widely-used Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence, which requires the distribution of the objective function to be exponentially bounded. Using the portfolio selection problem as an example, our comprehensive testings on multivariate heavy-tail datasets, both synthetic and real-world, shows that this business-interpretation approach is indeed useful and insightful.
△ Less
Submitted 21 September, 2020; v1 submitted 3 June, 2019;
originally announced June 2019.