MDGNN: Multi-Relational Dynamic Graph Neural Network for Comprehensive and Dynamic Stock Investment Prediction
Authors:
Hao Qian,
Hongting Zhou,
Qian Zhao,
Hao Chen,
Hongxiang Yao,
Jingwei Wang,
Ziqi Liu,
Fei Yu,
Zhiqiang Zhang,
Jun Zhou
Abstract:
The stock market is a crucial component of the financial system, but predicting the movement of stock prices is challenging due to the dynamic and intricate relations arising from various aspects such as economic indicators, financial reports, global news, and investor sentiment. Traditional sequential methods and graph-based models have been applied in stock movement prediction, but they have lim…
▽ More
The stock market is a crucial component of the financial system, but predicting the movement of stock prices is challenging due to the dynamic and intricate relations arising from various aspects such as economic indicators, financial reports, global news, and investor sentiment. Traditional sequential methods and graph-based models have been applied in stock movement prediction, but they have limitations in capturing the multifaceted and temporal influences in stock price movements. To address these challenges, the Multi-relational Dynamic Graph Neural Network (MDGNN) framework is proposed, which utilizes a discrete dynamic graph to comprehensively capture multifaceted relations among stocks and their evolution over time. The representation generated from the graph offers a complete perspective on the interrelationships among stocks and associated entities. Additionally, the power of the Transformer structure is leveraged to encode the temporal evolution of multiplex relations, providing a dynamic and effective approach to predicting stock investment. Further, our proposed MDGNN framework achieves the best performance in public datasets compared with state-of-the-art (SOTA) stock investment methods.
△ Less
Submitted 18 January, 2024;
originally announced February 2024.
A revised comparison between FF five-factor model and three-factor model,based on China's A-share market
Authors:
Zhijing Zhang,
Yue Yu,
Qinghua Ma,
Haixiang Yao
Abstract:
In allusion to some contradicting results in existing research, this paper selects China's latest stock data from 2005 to 2020 for empirical analysis. By choosing this periods' data, we avoid the periods of China's significant stock market reforms to reduce the impact of the government's policy on the factor effect. In this paper, the redundant factors (HML, CMA) are orthogonalized, and the regres…
▽ More
In allusion to some contradicting results in existing research, this paper selects China's latest stock data from 2005 to 2020 for empirical analysis. By choosing this periods' data, we avoid the periods of China's significant stock market reforms to reduce the impact of the government's policy on the factor effect. In this paper, the redundant factors (HML, CMA) are orthogonalized, and the regression analysis of 5*5 portfolio of Size-B/M and Size-Inv is carried out with these two orthogonalized factors. It found that the HML and the CMA are still significant in many portfolios, indicating that they have a strong explanatory ability, which is also consistent with the results of GRS test. All these show that the five-factor model has a better ability to explain the excess return rate. In the concrete analysis, this paper uses the methods of the five-factor 25-group portfolio returns calculation, the five-factor regression analysis, the orthogonal treatment, the five-factor 25-group regression and the GRS test to more comprehensively explain the excellent explanatory ability of the five-factor model to the excess return. Then, we analyze the possible reasons for the strong explanatory ability of the HML, CMA and RMW from the aspects of price to book ratio, turnover rate and correlation coefficient. We also give a detailed explanation of the results, and analyze the changes of China's stock market policy and investors' investment style recent years. Finally, this paper attempts to put forward some useful suggestions on the development of asset pricing model and China's stock market.
△ Less
Submitted 16 October, 2021;
originally announced December 2021.
