Showing 1–8 of 8 results for author: Deng, Q

Liquidity-adjusted Return and Volatility, and Autoregressive Models

Authors: Qi Deng, Zhong-guo Zhou

Abstract: We construct liquidity-adjusted return and volatility using purposely designed liquidity metrics (liquidity jump and liquidity diffusion) that incorporate additional liquidity information. Based on these measures, we introduce a liquidity-adjusted ARMA-GARCH framework to address the limitations of traditional ARMA-GARCH models, which are not effectively in modeling illiquid assets with high liquid… ▽ More We construct liquidity-adjusted return and volatility using purposely designed liquidity metrics (liquidity jump and liquidity diffusion) that incorporate additional liquidity information. Based on these measures, we introduce a liquidity-adjusted ARMA-GARCH framework to address the limitations of traditional ARMA-GARCH models, which are not effectively in modeling illiquid assets with high liquidity variability, such as cryptocurrencies. We demonstrate that the liquidity-adjusted model improves model fit for cryptocurrencies, with greater volatility sensitivity to past shocks and reduced volatility persistence of erratic past volatility. Our model is validated by the empirical evidence that the liquidity-adjusted mean-variance (LAMV) portfolios outperform the traditional mean-variance (TMV) portfolios. △ Less

Submitted 2 March, 2025; originally announced March 2025.

Liquidity Jump, Liquidity Diffusion, and Crypto Wash Trading

Authors: Qi Deng, Zhong-Guo Zhou

Abstract: We develop a new framework to detect wash trading in crypto assets through real-time liquidity fluctuation. We propose that short-term price jumps in crypto assets results from wash trading-induced liquidity fluctuation, and construct two complementary liquidity measures, liquidity jump (size of fluctuation) and liquidity diffusion (volatility of fluctuation), to capture the behavioral signature o… ▽ More We develop a new framework to detect wash trading in crypto assets through real-time liquidity fluctuation. We propose that short-term price jumps in crypto assets results from wash trading-induced liquidity fluctuation, and construct two complementary liquidity measures, liquidity jump (size of fluctuation) and liquidity diffusion (volatility of fluctuation), to capture the behavioral signature of wash trading. Using US stocks as a benchmark, we demonstrate that joint elevation in both liquidity metrics indicates wash trading in crypto assets. A simulated regulatory treatment that removes likely wash trades confirms this dynamic: it reduces liquidity diffusion significantly while leaving liquidity jump largely unaffected. These findings align with a theoretical model in which manipulative traders amplify both the level and variance of price pressure, whereas passive investors affect only the level. Our model offers practical tools for investors to assess market quality and for regulators to monitor manipulation risk on crypto exchanges without oversight. △ Less

Submitted 30 March, 2025; v1 submitted 28 October, 2024; originally announced November 2024.

Liquidity Adjustment in Multivariate Volatility Modeling: Evidence from Portfolios of Cryptocurrencies and US Stocks

Authors: Qi Deng

Abstract: We develop a liquidity-sensitive multivariate volatility framework to improve the estimation of time-varying covariance structures under market frictions. We introduce two novel portfolio-level liquidity measures, liquidity jump and liquidity diffusion, which capture magnitude and volatility of liquidity fluctuation, respectively, and construct liquidity-adjusted return and volatility that reflect… ▽ More We develop a liquidity-sensitive multivariate volatility framework to improve the estimation of time-varying covariance structures under market frictions. We introduce two novel portfolio-level liquidity measures, liquidity jump and liquidity diffusion, which capture magnitude and volatility of liquidity fluctuation, respectively, and construct liquidity-adjusted return and volatility that reflect real-time liquidity variability. These liquidity-adjusted inputs are integrated into a VECM-DCC/ADCC-Bayesian model, allowing for conditional and posterior covariance estimation under liquidity stress. Applying this framework to portfolios of cryptocurrencies and US stocks, we find that traditional models misrepresent volatility and co-movement, while liquidity-adjusted models yield more stable and interpretable risk structures, particularly for portfolios of cryptocurrencies. The findings support the use of liquidity-adjusted multivariate models as statistically grounded tools for assessing the propagation of portfolio risk under market frictions, with implications for asset pricing, market microstructure design, and portfolio management. △ Less

Submitted 17 April, 2025; v1 submitted 29 March, 2024; originally announced July 2024.

Comments: 48 pages, 1 figure

Liquidity Jump, Liquidity Diffusion, and Treatment on Wash Trading of Crypto Assets

Authors: Qi Deng, Zhong-guo Zhou

Abstract: We propose that the liquidity of an asset includes two components: liquidity jump and liquidity diffusion. We show that liquidity diffusion has a higher correlation with crypto wash trading than liquidity jump and demonstrate that treatment on wash trading significantly reduces the level of liquidity diffusion, but only marginally reduces that of liquidity jump. We confirm that the autoregressive… ▽ More We propose that the liquidity of an asset includes two components: liquidity jump and liquidity diffusion. We show that liquidity diffusion has a higher correlation with crypto wash trading than liquidity jump and demonstrate that treatment on wash trading significantly reduces the level of liquidity diffusion, but only marginally reduces that of liquidity jump. We confirm that the autoregressive models are highly effective in modeling the liquidity-adjusted return with and without the treatment on wash trading. We argue that treatment on wash trading is unnecessary in modeling established crypto assets that trade in unregulated but mainstream exchanges. △ Less

Submitted 11 May, 2024; v1 submitted 23 March, 2024; originally announced April 2024.

Comments: 37 pages all inclusive

The Impacts of Registration Regime Implementation on IPO Pricing Efficiency

Authors: Qi Deng, Linhong Zheng, Jiaqi Peng, Xu Li, Zhong-guo Zhou, Monica Hussein, Dingyi Chen, Mick Swartz

Abstract: We study the impacts of regime changes and related rule implementations on IPOs initial return for China entrepreneurial boards (ChiNext and STAR). We propose that an initial return contains the issuer fair value and an investors overreaction and examine their magnitudes and determinants. Our findings reveal an evolution of IPO pricing in response to the progression of regulation changes along fou… ▽ More We study the impacts of regime changes and related rule implementations on IPOs initial return for China entrepreneurial boards (ChiNext and STAR). We propose that an initial return contains the issuer fair value and an investors overreaction and examine their magnitudes and determinants. Our findings reveal an evolution of IPO pricing in response to the progression of regulation changes along four dimensions: 1) governing regulation regime, 2) listing day trading restrictions, 3) listing rules for issuers, and 4) participation requirements for investors. We find that the most efficient regulation regime in Chinese IPO pricing has four characteristics: 1) registration system, 2) no hard return caps nor trading curbs that restrict the initial return; 3) more specific listing rules for issuers, and 4) more stringent participation requirements for investors. In all contexts, we show that the registration regime governing the STAR IPOs offers the most efficient pricing. △ Less

Submitted 18 July, 2023; originally announced July 2023.

Comments: 41 pages, 4 figures

Liquidity Premium, Liquidity-Adjusted Return and Volatility, and Extreme Liquidity

Authors: Qi Deng, Zhong-guo Zhou

Abstract: We establish innovative liquidity premium measures, and construct liquidity-adjusted return and volatility to model assets with extreme liquidity, represented by a portfolio of selected crypto assets, and upon which we develop a set of liquidity-adjusted ARMA-GARCH/EGARCH models. We demonstrate that these models produce superior predictability at extreme liquidity to their traditional counterparts… ▽ More We establish innovative liquidity premium measures, and construct liquidity-adjusted return and volatility to model assets with extreme liquidity, represented by a portfolio of selected crypto assets, and upon which we develop a set of liquidity-adjusted ARMA-GARCH/EGARCH models. We demonstrate that these models produce superior predictability at extreme liquidity to their traditional counterparts. We provide empirical support by comparing the performances of a series of Mean Variance portfolios. △ Less

Submitted 16 February, 2024; v1 submitted 27 June, 2023; originally announced June 2023.

Comments: 48 page, 7 figures

The Impact of Regulation Regime Changes on ChiNext IPOs: Effects of 2013 and 2020 Reforms on Pricing and Overreaction

Authors: Qi Deng, Lunge Dai, Zixin Yang, Zhong-guo Zhou, Monica Hussein, Dingyi Chen, Mick Swartz

Abstract: Since its inauguration, ChiNext has gone through three time periods with two different regulation regimes and three different sets of listing day trading restrictions. This paper studies the impact of regulation regimes and listing day trading restrictions on the initial return of ChiNext IPOs. We hypothesize that the initial return of a ChiNext IPO contains the issuers intrinsic value and the inv… ▽ More Since its inauguration, ChiNext has gone through three time periods with two different regulation regimes and three different sets of listing day trading restrictions. This paper studies the impact of regulation regimes and listing day trading restrictions on the initial return of ChiNext IPOs. We hypothesize that the initial return of a ChiNext IPO contains the issuers intrinsic value and the investors overreaction. The intrinsic value is represented by the IPOs 21st day return (monthly return), and the difference between the monthly and initial returns (intramonth return) is a proxy of the overreaction. We find that all significant variables for all three returns in all three time periods fall into four categories: pre-listing demand, post-listing demand, market condition and pre-listing issuer value. We observe stark contrasts among variable categories for each of the returns in the three time periods, which reveals an evolution of the investors behavior with regard to the progression of regulation regimes. Based on our findings, we argue that the differences among the levels and determinants of initial return, monthly return (intrinsic value) and intramonth return (overreaction) in different time periods can be largely explained by regulation regime changes along two dimensions: 1) approval vs. registration and 2) listing day trading curbs and return limits. We find that IPO pricing is demand-driven under the approval regime, but value-driven under the registration regime. We further compare the impact of regulation regime changes on ChiNext IPO pricing practice, and propose a future research plan on ChiNext IPO pricing efficiency with policy implication. △ Less

Submitted 19 November, 2022; originally announced December 2022.

Artificial Intelligence BlockCloud (AIBC) Technical Whitepaper

Authors: Qi Deng

Abstract: The AIBC is an Artificial Intelligence and blockchain technology based large-scale decentralized ecosystem that allows system-wide low-cost sharing of computing and storage resources. The AIBC consists of four layers: a fundamental layer, a resource layer, an application layer, and an ecosystem layer. The AIBC implements a two-consensus scheme to enforce upper-layer economic policies and achieve f… ▽ More The AIBC is an Artificial Intelligence and blockchain technology based large-scale decentralized ecosystem that allows system-wide low-cost sharing of computing and storage resources. The AIBC consists of four layers: a fundamental layer, a resource layer, an application layer, and an ecosystem layer. The AIBC implements a two-consensus scheme to enforce upper-layer economic policies and achieve fundamental layer performance and robustness: the DPoEV incentive consensus on the application and resource layers, and the DABFT distributed consensus on the fundamental layer. The DABFT uses deep learning techniques to predict and select the most suitable BFT algorithm in order to achieve the best balance of performance, robustness, and security. The DPoEV uses the knowledge map algorithm to accurately assess the economic value of digital assets. △ Less

Submitted 26 September, 2019; originally announced September 2019.