Crises and Physical Phases of a Bipartite Market Model
Authors:
Nima Dehmamy,
Sergey Buldyrev,
Shlomo Havlin,
Harry Eugene Stanley,
Irena Vodenska
Abstract:
We analyze the linear response of a market network to shocks based on the bipartite market model we introduced in an earlier paper, which we claimed to be able to identify the time-line of the 2009-2011 Eurozone crisis correctly. We show that this model has three distinct phases that can broadly be categorized as "stable" and "unstable". Based on the interpretation of our behavioral parameters, th…
▽ More
We analyze the linear response of a market network to shocks based on the bipartite market model we introduced in an earlier paper, which we claimed to be able to identify the time-line of the 2009-2011 Eurozone crisis correctly. We show that this model has three distinct phases that can broadly be categorized as "stable" and "unstable". Based on the interpretation of our behavioral parameters, the stable phase describes periods where investors and traders have confidence in the market (e.g. predict that the market rebounds from a loss). We show that the unstable phase happens when there is a lack of confidence and seems to describe "boom-bust" periods in which changes in prices are exponential. We analytically derive these phases and where the phase transition happens using a mean field approximation of the model. We show that the condition for stability is $αβ<1$ with $α$ being the inverse of the "price elasticity" and $β$ the "income elasticity of demand", which measures how rash the investors make decisions. We also show that in the mean-field limit this model reduces to the Langevin model by Bouchaud et al. for price returns.
△ Less
Submitted 3 October, 2016; v1 submitted 19 September, 2016;
originally announced September 2016.
Classical mechanics of economic networks
Authors:
Nima Dehmamy,
Sergey V. Buldyrev,
Shlomo Havlin,
H. Eugene Stanley,
Irena Vodenska
Abstract:
Financial networks are dynamic. To assess their systemic importance to the world-wide economic network and avert losses we need models that take the time variations of the links and nodes into account. Using the methodology of classical mechanics and Laplacian determinism we develop a model that can predict the response of the financial network to a shock. We also propose a way of measuring the sy…
▽ More
Financial networks are dynamic. To assess their systemic importance to the world-wide economic network and avert losses we need models that take the time variations of the links and nodes into account. Using the methodology of classical mechanics and Laplacian determinism we develop a model that can predict the response of the financial network to a shock. We also propose a way of measuring the systemic importance of the banks, which we call BankRank. Using European Bank Authority 2011 stress test exposure data, we apply our model to the bipartite network connecting the largest institutional debt holders of the troubled European countries (Greece, Italy, Portugal, Spain, and Ireland). From simulating our model we can determine whether a network is in a "stable" state in which shocks do not cause major losses, or a "unstable" state in which devastating damages occur. Fitting the parameters of the model, which play the role of physical coupling constants, to Eurozone crisis data shows that before the Eurozone crisis the system was mostly in a "stable" regime, and that during the crisis it transitioned into an "unstable" regime. The numerical solutions produced by our model match closely the actual time-line of events of the crisis. We also find that, while the largest holders are usually more important, in the unstable regime smaller holders also exhibit systemic importance. Our model also proves useful for determining the vulnerability of banks and assets to shocks. This suggests that our model may be a useful tool for simulating the response dynamics of shared portfolio networks.
△ Less
Submitted 9 December, 2014; v1 submitted 1 October, 2014;
originally announced October 2014.
